With its low molecular weight, high degree of rigidity,
and association with biological activity, the bis-THF structure
is an interesting scaffold. Any substitution on a nonfused
bond position renders the bicycle chiral. There are two
H-bond acceptors, which, incidentally, play a crucial role in
the interaction of TMC-114 with the protease enzyme.
We were interested in the synthesis of the chiral 4,6-
disubstituted bis-THF 5 (Scheme 1) as a versatile intermedi-
Scheme 2. Cyanide Approach
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
targeted (Scheme 2). To this end, selective protection of
arabitol under kinetic conditions to the 1,2:4,5-diacetal 89
was followed by conversion to the triflate 9 and mesylate
10 in high yield (100% and 93%).10 However, reaction of 9
with NaCN in DMF at room temperature only returned
elimination products 12 and 13 in 80% combined yield. The
formation of the olefin isomers arises from unselective
cyanide attack of the diastereotopic â-protons. Attempting
to favor substitution over elimination by lowering the reaction
temperature (0 °C; -40 °C) only reduced the yield (63%;
59%). When the mesylate 10 was subjected to NaCN, no
reaction occurred at room temperature, and only 27% of
12/13 was obtained after 1 day at 110 °C.
ate for scaffold applications, in particular, toward the syn-
thesis of TMC-114 analogues with substitution at the exo-
6-position, where modeling has suggested that additional
interactions with the HIV-protease might be possible. To the
best of our knowledge, such analogues have not yet been
reported. An essential part of this work entailed the inves-
tigation toward a selective differentiation of the diastereotopic
alcohols. The synthesis and monofunctionalization of 5 is
reported herein.
Next, the synthesis of 6 was investigated via an alkene
hydroboration/oxidation sequence.8a Oxidation of 89a,b and
Wittig reaction led to 159b in excellent yield (Scheme 3).
The retrosynthetic analysis is shown in Scheme 1. Discon-
nections at the acetal center lead to 6. The acid-catalyzed
formation of a bis-THF ring via a central formyl group, or
from a preformed five-membered (hemi)-acetal, is known.8
Further disconnection as indicated leads to L-arabitol 7 as
starting material. Importantly for scaffold applications, both
arabitol enantiomers are commercially available at similar
cost.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the Cyclization Precursor 6
A key feature in this approach is that, starting from
“pseudo-C2-symmetric” arabitol, the central carbon atom
remains nonstereogenic throughout the sequence, thus mini-
mizing diastereoselectivity issues. In addition, the selective
formation of a cis-fused bis-THF system was expected under
thermodynamic control.
The synthesis of the aldehyde 6 was first envisaged via
The subsequent hydroboration reaction proved to be an
eventful step (see below), but by using diethylborane as
reagent, a good yield of the alcohol 16 was obtained after
oxidative workup. Finally, Parikh-Doering oxidation11 of
16 gave 6 in excellent yield.
The hydroboration reaction was initially investigated with
BH3‚DMS as reagent which led to the formation of an acetal
reduction of a cyano group.8b Hence, the nitrile 11 was
(6) (a) Ghosh, A. K.; Shin, D. W.; Swanson, L.; Krishnan, K.; Cho, H.;
Hussain, K. A.; Walters, D. E.; Holland, L.; Buthod, J. Il Farm. 2001, 56,
29. (b) Ghosh, A. K.; Kincaid, J. F.; Cho, W.; Walters, D. E.; Krishnan,
K.; Hussain, K. A.; Koo, Y.; Cho, H.; Rudall, C.; Holland, L.; Buthod, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 687.
(7) Surleraux, D. L. N. G.; Tahri, A.; Verschueren, W. G.; Pille, G. M.
E.; de Kock, H. A.; Jonckers, T. H. M.; Peeters, A.; De Meyer, S.; Azijn,
H.; Pauwels, R.; de Bethune, M.-P.; King, N. M.; Prabu-Jeyabalan, M.;
Schiffer, C. A.; Wigerinck, P. B. T. P. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1813.
(8) Selected examples toward saturated, monoacetal bis-THF via a formyl
group: (a) Alonso, F.; Lorenzo, E.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
2187. (b) Vader, J.; Sengers, H.; De Groot, Ae. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2131.
(c) Roggenbuck, R.; Schmidt, A.; Eilbracht, P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 289.
Via acetal exchange: (d) Schreiber, S. L.; Satake, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 4186. (e) Tadano, K.-I.; Yamada, H.; Idogaki, Y.; Ogawa, S.;
Suami, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 655.
(9) (a) Linclau, B; Boydell, A. J.; Clarke, P. J.; Horan, R.; Jacquet, C.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1821. (b) Maleczka, R. E., Jr.; Terrell, L. R.; Geng,
F.; Ward, J. S., III. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2841. See also: (c) Terauchi, T.;
Terauchi, T.; Sato, I.; Tsukada, T.; Kanoh, N.; Nakata, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 2649.
(10) Boydell, A. J.; Jeffery, M. J.; Bu¨rkstu¨mmer, E.; Linclau, B. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8252.
(11) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. von E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505.
5822
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 25, 2006