as CeCl3 resulted in no change to the reaction results.
Fortunately, we found that the problem could be solved by
the use of CuCN;9 the desired product was obtained in 58%
yield without the detection of an R-adduct (entry 9, Table
1). The addition of the anion generated from diallylsilane
1b by using Schlosser’s base in THF at -78 °C to
benzaldehyde was found to afford the desired vinylsilane in
33% yield (entry 10, Table 1), but the yield was improved
to 63% when the anion was generated in ether (entry 11,
Table 1).
conditions the desired coupling product 4a was obtained in
74% yield (entry 1, Table 3). The yield was relatively lower
Table 3. Optimization of Cross-Coupling
entry
1
conditions
yield % 4a
We then used 3a to investigate the activation of the allyl
group by TBAF in THF and found that when 3a was treated
with 2 equiv of TBAF in THF for 6 h at room temperature
95% of 3a was recovered (entry 1, Table 2). The presence
PhI/TBAF (2 equiv)/EtOH (6 equiv)
Pd2(dba)3 (5%)/THF/rt/4 h
1. TBAF (2 equiv)/EtOH (6 equiv)
Pd2(dba)3 (5%)/THF/rt/0.5 h
2. PhI/4 h
74
2
91
Table 2. Allyl Group Activation
than the coupling of the 2-propoxy-substituted vinylsilane
in a previous study.4 We suspected the lower yield in this
case was caused by the coupling of the allyl group with
iodobenzene. We found that the yield was improved to 91%
by running the activation for 30 min as described above
(entry 3, Table 2) and then adding iodobenzene to accomplish
the cross-coupling.
Being satisfied with the results obtained in entry 2 of Table
3, we moved on to test the variation of aryl iodide in this
Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling by using 3a and 3e as repre-
sentative vinylsilanes under these conditions. When para-
substituted aryl iodides were employed, the coupling reaction
consistently afforded the coupling product in good yields
(70-91%, entries 1-4 and 6-9, Table 4). The reaction was
entry
1
conditions
time (h)
6
results
TBAF (2 equiv)/THF/rt
95% 3a
recovereda
96% 3a
2
3
4
TBAF (2 equiv)/THF/rt
EtOH (6 equiv)
TBAF (2 equiv)/EtOH (6 equiv)
Pd2(dba)3 (5%)/THF/rt
EtOH (6 equiv)
6
recovereda
100% 3a
consumedb
98% 3a
0.5
6
Pd2(dba)3 (5%)/THF/rt
recovereda
a Isolated by flash chromatography. b TLC and crude H NMR.
1
Table 4. Variation of ArI in the Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
of 6 equiv of ethanol in the above reaction resulted in no
change of the reaction result; 96% of 3a could be recovered
after 6 h of reaction (entry 2, Table 2). However, when 2
equiv of TBAF, 6 equiv of EtOH, and 5% of Pd2(dba)3 were
employed together, TLC showed that 3a was consumed in
isolated
yield (%)
1
entry
ArIa
vinylsilane
product (Ar, R)
Ph
4-EtO2CC6H4, H
4-AcC6H4, H
4-MeOC6H4, H
2-MeOC6H4, H
Ph, Me
less than 30 min. After workup, H NMR characterization
of the crude product indicated that the distinctive signals
associated with the allyl group had completely disappeared
whereas those of the vinyl functionality were intact (entry
3, Table 2). As a comparison, we only recovered the starting
3a from the reaction run with Pd2(dba)3 and 6 equiv of EtOH
(entry 4, Table 2). These results suggest that the TBAF and
the Pd catalyst worked together to activate the allyl group.
A plausible explanation for this is that the interactions of
the Pd species with the double bonds (either with allyl or
with the vinyl or even with both) enhance the affinity of the
fluoride anion with silicon, thus accelerating the reaction.
Having demonstrated that the allyl group could serve as a
preactivation group under the coupling conditions, we
proceeded to test the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of 3a with
iodobenzene. We first performed the coupling reaction
without preactivation of the allyl group, under which
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PhI
3a
3a
3a
3a
3a
3e
3e
3e
3e
3e
4a (91)
4b (85)
4c (84)
4d (78)
4e (63)
4f (74)
4-EtO2CC6H4I
4-AcC6H4I
4-MeOC6H4I
2-MeOC6H4Ib
PhI
4-EtO2CC6H4I
4-AcC6H4I
4-MeOC6H4I
2-MeOC6H4Ib
4-EtO2CC6H4, Me 4g (82)
4-AcC6H4, Me
4-MeOC6H4, Me
2-MeOC6H4, Me
4h (83)
4i (70)
4j (11)
10
a Catalyst: Pd2(dba)3/4 h. b Catalyst: (allylPdCl)2/24 h.
compatible with functional groups such as ketone and ester.
When 2-iodoanisole was employed and the coupling was
done by using (allylPdCl)2 as the catalyst, we found that 3a
acted as an efficient coupling partner (entry 5, Table 4), but
3e did not (entry 10, Table 4). The difference might be due
to the increased steric hindrance from the methyl group in
3e.
(9) For a previous application of CuCN in modifying the reactivity of
silylallylmetal, see: Corriu, R. J. P.; Guerin, C.; M’Boula, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1981, 22, 2985.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 17, 2006
3735