636 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2010
and synthesised. It displays high selectivity for Fe3+ revealed
by fluorescence quenching.
Experimental
All reagents, obtained from commercial sources, were of AR grade.
Melting points were determined with an XT4A micro-melting point
apparatus and were uncorrected. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a
Mercury Plus-400 spectrometer with TMS as internal reference and
CDCl3 as solvent. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer PE-983
IR spectrometer as KBr pellets. MS were obtained with a Finnigan
Trace MS instrument using the EI method. Elemental analyses were
carried out on a Vario EL III instrument. Fluorescence spectra were
determined on a Hitachi F-4500 instrument.
Compounds 1, 2 and 35–6 were prepared by the literature method.
Preparation of 4: To a solution of compound 3 (1.25g, 0.0050 mol)
in CH2Cl2 (18 mL), 4-chloro-3-ethyl-1- methyl-1H-pyrazole-5-car-
bonyl chloride (3.11 g, 0.015 mol) was added. Subsequently, Et3N
(1.52 g, 0.015 mol) was added dropwise into the solution under
stirring. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux, then stirred for
4 h. Subsequently, it was cooled to room temperature. The reaction
solution was filtered off and some white solid was separated. The
organic phase was washed with water and then dried over Na2SO4.
After removal of the solvent, a brown solid was obtained.After column
chromatography using ethylacetate/light petroleum (1:6) as eluent,
compound 4 (1.1g, 37.16%) was obtained as a white solid. M.p.134.2–
134.9 °C (dec.). TLC (CH3COOCH2CH3/petroleum ether, 3:1), Rf
0.51. IR (KBr, cm−1): 2226, 1740, 1728, 1685, 1630, 1645. 1H NMR
δ: 1.25 (t, 6H, CH3, J = 7.5Hz), 1.37 (t, 3H, CO2CH2CH3, J = 7.0 Hz),
2.66 (q, 4H, CH2CH3, J = 7.5 Hz), 3.9 (s, 6H, NCH3), 4.36 (q, 2H,
CO2CH2CH3, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.26–7.45 (m, 4H, ArH). MS (EI): m/z =
593 [M + H]+. Anal. Calcd for C26H25Cl3N604 (591.87): C, 52.75;
H, 4.27; N, 17.98. Found: C, 52.51; H, 4.15; N, 17.67 %.
Fig. 2 Fluorescence emission changes of 4 (1×10−5 M) in DMF
in the presence of 12×10−5 M of various metal ions (excitation at
358 nm). (1) Fe3+, (2) host, (3) Sn4+, (4) Cu2+, (5) Sr2+, (6) Ag+,
(7)Ni2+, (8)Cr3+, (9) Co2+, (10) Pb2+.
X-ray diffraction
A white crystal of 4 was mounted on a glass fibre in a random orien-
tation at 298(2) K. The determination of the unit cell and the data
collection were performed with MoKa radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) on
a Bruker Smart Apex-CCD diffactometer with a ψ-ω scan mode.
The structure was solved by direct methods with the SHELXS-97 pro-
grams7,8 and expanded by Fourier technique. The non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were placed at
the calculated positions.
Crystal data for 4: C26H25Cl3N604, M = 591.87, Triclinic, space
group P2(1)/c, a = 10.7277(3)Å, b = 16.1476(5)Å, c = 17.3109(5)Å,
α = 90 °, β = 107.671(2)°, γ = 90°, V = 2857.21(14) Å3, Z = 4, Dc =
1.376 Mg m−3, Reflections collected: 18010, independent reflections:
5600 [Rint = 0.0453], Final R indices [I>2ϭ(I)]: R1 = 0.0646, wR2 =
0.1519. R indices (all data): R1 = 0.1050, wR2= 0.1700.
Fig. 3 Fluorescence emission spectra (excitation at 358nm) of
4 (1×10−5 M) in DMF in the presence of different concentration
of Fe3+. Inset: Stern–Volmer plot of the emission data.
We thank the Scientific Research Foundation of Hubei Normal
University (Grant No. 2008D39) for financial support.
The quenching of the electronically excited state of aromatic
hydrocarbons by Fe3+ chelates is a known phenomenon that
has been the subject of extensive investigations. It has been
suggested that two main pathways can account for the efficient
radiationless deactivation of the singlet excited state, electron
transfer from the excited aromatic chromophore to the metal
and/or energy transfer from the excited aromatic chromophore
to low-lying metal centred energy states. Such processes could
be particularly effective in the complex of 4 with Fe3+, due
probably to the fact that the chelated metal cation is held very
close to two excited aromatic chromophores. In addition,
because the molecular clips 4 has different sidewalls but the
same binding properties compared to previously reported
molecular clips, we may draw the conclusion that the 2-ethyl
cyanoacrylate ring plays a crucial role in the recognition of
Fe3+.
Received 29 July 2010; accepted 26 September 2010
Paper 1000271 doi: 10.3184/030823410X12886279660671
Published online: 24 November 2010
References
1
Huayin Liu. Biorational design, American Chemical Society, 2001,
pp. 226-235.
2
3
H. Toshio, H. Isaburo and H. Hideo, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 1965, 30, 695.
J.N.H. Reek, A.H. Priem, H. Engelkamp, A.E. Rowan, J.A.A.W. E1emans
and R.J.M. Nolte, J Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 9956.
J.A.A.W. E1emans, R.R.J. Slangen, A.E. Rowan and R.J.M. Nolte, J Org.
Chem., 2003, 68, 9040.
4
5
6
7
J.N. Phillips and J.L. Huppatz, Z.Naturforsch., 1987, 42C, 684.
J.N. Phillips and J.L. Huppatz, Z.Naturforsch., 1987, 42C, 679.
G.M. Sheldrick. SHEL.XS-97: Program for Crystal Structure Solution.
University of Göttingen: Germany, 1997.
In conclusion, a new clip molecule derived from 2-ethyl
cyanoacrylate as fluorescent chemosensor has been designed
8
G.M. Sheldrick. SHEL.XS-97: Program for Crystal Structure Refinement.
University of Göttingen: Germany, 1997.