sequence are difficult to access from alternate catalytic
asymmetric reactions.
of the electron-rich allylic C-B bond with the reacting
π-system. Similar to the “H-inside” preference in the Still5a
and Houk9 models for hydroboration of chiral allylic alco-
hols, the syn diastereomer in Scheme 1 may arise from Model
A. Support for this hypothesis arises from the hydrobora-
tion with borane as the reductant, which proceeds with 2:1
syn/anti stereoselection (data not shown). Arguably, with the
smaller borane, the benzyl group may adopt the inside
position (i.e., Model B) thereby alleviating an A(1,2)
interaction between the Bn and B(pin) groups that is present
in Model A. Also consistent with this model is the observa-
tion that stereoselection is diminished as the size of the allene
substituent is enhanced (vide infra). This outcome likely
arises from an enhanced A(1,2) interaction in Model A that
can be alleviated by adopting Model C.
Effective deployment of the catalytic diboration/hydro-
boration/cross-coupling sequence for stereoselective organic
synthesis requires that hydroboration of the allene diboration
product (2, Scheme 1) proceeds in a stereoselective fashion
and provides a primary organoboron (4) that is able to
participate in cross-coupling reactions. Diastereoselective
hydroboration of R-chiral 1,1-disubstituted olefins5 is well
studied, as is the hydroboration of chiral allylsilanes.6
However, the hydroboration of unsaturated organoboron
compounds is less studied, with only a few investigations
on the reaction of vinylborons7 and allylborons.8 To assess
the stereoselection in hydroboration of allene diboration
products, experiments were conducted on purified racemic
5 (Scheme 2). As can be observed in Scheme 2, when
B-Alkyl Suzuki cross-coupling reactions often employ
9-BBN-derived organoboranes and are catalyzed by pal-
ladium complexes in conjunction with phosphorus-based
ligands.4,10 Accordingly, the sequential diboration/hydro-
boration/cross-coupling reaction was examined. Noting that
the characteristics of the catalyst for the diboration are similar
to those of common cross-coupling catalysts, the reaction
sequence was attempted without introduction of an additional
catalyst for the cross-coupling, beyond that which is present
from the diboration process. In the event, catalytic diboration
of 1,2-tridecadiene was accomplished with 2.5 mol % of
Pd2(dba)3 and 6 mol % of (R,R)-3 in toluene solvent. After
12 h of reaction, 9-BBN was added directly to the reaction
mixture which was stirred for 14 h. Then, simply adding
iodobenzene and 2 equiv of cesium carbonate, without an
additional palladium catalyst or ligand, was sufficient to
bring about cross-coupling in good yield and diastereose-
lection and with excellent control of the absolute configu-
ration. This “recycling” of the original palladium diboration
catalyst for the Suzuki cross-coupling thereby reduces both
reaction cost and generation of palladium waste. The de-
scribed reaction sequence was examined with the allenes
Scheme 2
compound 5 was subjected to hydroboration with 9-BBN,
followed by oxidation and acylation (to ease manipulation
and analysis), the resulting triacetate was obtained in good
yield and diastereoselection. Similar to the stereoelectronic
effect proposed by Fleming6 to explain the stereochemical
favoritism in the hydroboration of allylic silanes, the origin
of diastereoselectivity in Scheme 2 can be rationalized
beginning with a transition structure that involves alignment
Table 1. Single-Pot Diboration/Hydroboration/Suzuki
Coupling/Oxidationa
(2) (a) Woodward, A. R.; Burks, H. E.; Chan, L. M.; Morken, J. P. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 5505. (b) Sieber, J. D.; Morken, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 74.
(3) For a related sequential asymmetric alkene diboration/cross-coupling,
see: Miller, S. P.; Morgan, J. B.; Nepveux, F. J.; Morken, J. P. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 131.
(4) For many examples of fragment couplings based on B-alkyl Suzuki
reactions, see: Chemler, S. R.; Trauner, D.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4544.
(5) (a) Still, W. C.; Barrish, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2487.
(b) McGarvey, G. J.; Bajwa, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 6297. (c)
Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, A.; Godel, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 4577. (d)
Birtwistle, D. H.; Brown, J. M.; Foxton, M. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 4367. (e) Midland, M. M.; Kwon, Y. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
3725.
(6) (a) Fleming, I.; Lawrence, N. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1992,
3309. (b) Fleming, I.; Lawrence, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2077.
(c) Fleming, I.; Lawrence, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 2073.
(7) (a) Pasto, D. J.; Chow, J.; Arora, S. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 723.
(b) Aronovich, P. M.; Bogdanov, V. S.; Mikhailov, B. M. IzV. Akad. Nauk.
SSSR, Ser. Khim. 1969, 362. (c) Matteson, D. S.; Bowie, R. A.; Srivasta, G
J. Organomet. Chem. 1969, 16, 33. (d) Pasto, D. J.; Chow, J.; Arora, S. K.
Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 1557. (e) Wiesauer, C.; Weissensteiner, W.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 5.
a Conditions: 2.5 mol % of Pd2(dba)3, 6 mol % of ligand, 1.2 equiv of
B2(pin)2, PhMe, room temp, 14 h; then 1.2 equiv of 9-BBN, 9 h; then 2.25
equiv of Cs2CO3, 2.25 equiv of PhI, 80 °C, 12 h; then oxidative workup
with H2O2/NaOH, 8 h.
(8) Mikhailov, B. M.; Pozdnev, V. F.; Kiselev Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSR
1963, 151, 577.
4558
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 20, 2006