Um et al.
TABLE 1. Summary of Second-Order Rate Constants (kN, M-1
catalytic effects in nucleophilic substitution reactions of aryl
diphenylphosphinate and its analogues. Besides, La3+ ion has
been recently shown to be extremely effective on alkaline
methanolysis of phosphate di- and triesters.7
s-1) for the Reactions of 2,4-Dinitrophenyl Diphenylphosphinate (1a)
and 2,4-Dinitrophenyl Benzoate (2a) with Alicyclic Secondary
Amines in 80 mol % H2O/20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ( 0.1 °C
kN/M-1 s-1
Kinetic studies have also been performed intensively to
investigate the mechanism of biological processes.5,8-10 How-
ever, most studies have been focused on hydrolysis in alkaline
conditions. Williams et al. have performed reactions of 4-ni-
trophenyl diphenylphosphinate with aryloxides in aqueous
medium and concluded that the reactions proceed through a
concerted mechanism.8a The evidence suggested for a concerted
mechanism is a linear Brønsted-type plot for the reactions with
a series of aryloxides whose pKa values are greater than and
less than that of the leaving 4-nitrophenoxide.8a On the other
hand, alkaline hydrolysis of aryl diphenylphosphinates has been
suggested to proceed through a pentacoordinate intermediate
with its formation being the rate-determining step (RDS) on
the basis of good Hammett correlations with σo constants.8b,c
A similar conclusion has been drawn for imidazole catalyzed
hydrolysis of aryl diphenylphosphinates8d and alkaline etha-
nolysis of aryl dimethylphosphinates.5a
Only few reports are available on aminolysis of phosphoryl
and related esters.9,10 Accordingly, their mechanism has not been
completely understood. Cook et al. have concluded that ami-
nolysis of 4-nitrophenyl diphenylphosphinate in MeCN proceed
through a stepwise mechanism in which breakdown of a
zwitterionic pentacoordinate intermediate is the RDS.9 In the
reaction with n-butylamine, the breakdown of the zwitterionic
intermediate has been shown to be general base catalyzed since
the reaction follows a two-term rate law, i.e., one first order in
amine and the other second order in amine.9 On the contrary,
a
entry
amine
pKa
1a
2ab
174
167
82.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
piperidine
11.02
10.8
9.85
9.38
8.65
7.98
5.95
4.19
4.29
2.34
0.939
0.573
0.332
0.0709
3-methylpiperidine
piperazine
1-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine
morpholine
1-formylpiperazine
piperazinium ion
19.6
5.43
0.467
a The pKa data in 20 mol % DMSO. Data were taken from ref 11. b The
data for the reactions of 2a were taken from ref 11.
Lee et al. have suggested that reactions of phenyl-substituted
phenyl chlorophosphates with pyridines proceed through a
concerted mechanism in MeCN, since the Brønsted-type plots
obtained are linear with small ânuc values (0.16-0.18).10a
We have performed two series of kinetic studies to investigate
the reaction mechanism, i.e., reactions of 1a with seven different
alicyclic secondary amines and reactions of piperidine with nine
different Y-substituted phenyl diphenylphosphinates (1a-j) in
water containing 20 mol % dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 25.0
( 0.1 °C. The kinetic data obtained in this study have been
compared with those reported for the corresponding reactions
of Y-substituted phenyl benzoates (2a-i) since the reaction
mechanism for aminolysis of these benzoates has been fairly
well understood. We report the effect of modification of the
electrophilic center from CdO to PdO on the reactivity and
reaction mechanism. We also show that deduction of reaction
mechanism based just on Hammett correlations with σ- or σo
constants alone can be misleading.
(3) (a) Balakrishnan, V. K.; Buncel, E.; van Loon, G. W. EnViron. Sci.
Technol. 2005, 39, 5824-5830. (b) Balakrishnan, V. K.; Han, X.; van Loon,
G. W.; Dust, J. M.; Toullec, J.; Buncel, E. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6586-
6593. (c) Bunton, C. A.; Foroudian, H. J. Langmuir 1993, 9, 2832-2835.
(d) Yang, Y. C.; Berg, F. J.; Szafraniec, L. L.; Beaudry, W. T.; Bunton, C.
A.; Kumar, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 607-613. (e) Toullec,
J.; Moukawin, M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 221-222. (f) Bhattacharya, S.;
Vemula, P. K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9677-9685.
(4) (a) Terrier, F.; Le Guevel, E.; Chartrousse, A. P.; Moutiers, G.;
Buncel, E. Chem. Commun. 2003, 600-601. (b) Bunton, C. A.; Nelson, S.
E.; Quan, C. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1157-1160. (c) Couderc, S.; Toullec,
J. Langmuir 2001, 17, 3819-3828.
(5) (a) Buncel, E.; Albright, K. G.; Onyido, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004,
2, 601-610. (b) Nagelkerke, R.; Thatcher, G. R. J.; Buncel, E. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2003, 1, 163-167. (c) Buncel, E.; Nagelkerke, R.; Thatcher, G. R.
J. Can. J. Chem. 2003, 81, 53-63. (d) Um, I. H.; Jeon, S. E.; Baek, M. H.;
Park, H. R. Chem. Commun. 2003, 3016-3017. (e) Pregel. M. J.; Buncel,
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10-14.
(6) (a) Zalatan, J.; Herschlag, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1293-
1303. (b) O’Brien, P. J.; Herschlag, D. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 5691-5699.
(c) Catrina, I. E.; Hennge, A. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2156-
2163. (d) Herschlag, D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4665-
4674.
(7) (a) Gibson, G. T. T.; Neverov, A. A.; Teng, A. C. T.; Brown, R. S.
Can. J. Chem. 2005, 83, 1268-1276. (b) Tsang, J. S.; Neverov, A. A.;
Brown, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1559-1566. (c) Tsang, A. A.;
Neverov, A. A.; Brown, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7602-7607.
(8) (a) Bourne, N.; Chrystiuk, E.; Davis, A. M.; Williams, A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1890-1895. (b) Cook, R. D.; Rahhal-Arabi, L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3147-3150. (c) Haake, P.; McCoy, D. R.;
Okamura, W.; Alpha, S. R.; Wong, S. W.; Tyssee, D. A.; McNeal, J. P.;
Cook, R. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 5243-5246. (d) Williams, A.; Naylor,
J. J. Chem. Soc. B 1971, 1967-1972.
(9) Cook, R. D.; Daouk, W. A.; Hajj, A. N.; Kabbani, A.; Kurku, A.;
Samaha, M.; Shayban, F.; Tanielian, O. V. Can. J. Chem. 1986, 64, 213-
219.
(10) (a) Guha, A. K.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 12-
15. (b) Guha, A. K.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2
1999, 765-770.
Results and Discussion
All reactions in this study obeyed pseudo-first-order kinetics
in the presence of a large excess of amine. From product studies,
it is clear that the one molecule of amine involved is the
attacking nucleophile, and it is not acting as a general base
toward solvent attack. Pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobsd
)
were determined from the equation ln(A∞ - At) ) -kobsdt + c.
The correlation coefficient for the linear regression was usually
higher than 0.999. The plots of kobsd vs amine concentration
were linear passing through the origin, indicating that general
base catalysis by the second amine molecule is absent and the
contribution of H2O and/or OH- ion from amine equilibration
with water present to kobsd is negligible. The second-order rate
constants (kN) were determined from the slope of the linear plots
of kobsd vs amine concentration. The uncertainty in the kN values
is estimated to be less than 3% from replicate runs. The kN
values determined are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Effect of Amine Basicity on Reactivity and Mechanism.
As shown in Table 1, the kN value for the reactions of 1a
decreases as the amine basicity decreases, i.e., it decreases from
4.19 M-1 s-1 to 0.939 and 0.0709 M-1 s-1 as the pKa of the
conjugate acid of the amine decreases from 11.02 to 9.38 and
5.95, respectively. A similar result can be seen for the
corresponding reactions of 2a. However, the phosphinate 1a is
much less reactive than the benzoate 2a regardless of the amine
basicity.
The effect of amine basicity on reactivity is illustrated in
Figure 1. The Brønsted-type plot for the reactions of 1a is linear
7716 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 20, 2006