5532
R. Romagnoli et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5530–5533
inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in a
concentration-dependent manner from 1 to 10 lM with
a maximum inhibition of 48%. The pyridine ring fused
to the 2-amino-3-aroyl thiophene ring system led to a
significant loss of activity. Thus, these compounds gen-
erally have no potency or efficacy as allosteric enhancers
through the concentration range tested. Only one com-
pound of this series (3h) exhibited a concentration-de-
pendent activity comparable with that of the reference
compound, PD 81,723, at all tested concentrations, with
37% inhibition at 10 lM. Replacing the benzoyl with a
bulky 1-naphthoyl yielded compound (3i), active only
at 10 lM.
from this series (3h) was shown to have activity as an
allosteric enhancer and thus the thieno[2,3-c]pyridine
nucleus could be useful as a precursor for the synthesis
of further compounds.
Acknowledgment
We thank King Pharmaceuticals Research and Develop-
ment, Inc. for financial support.
References and notes
1. Christopoulos, A.; Kennakin, T. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002,
54, 323.
2. Gao, Z. G.; Kim, S.-K.; Ijzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A.
Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 545.
3. Baraldi, P. G.; Moorman, A. R.; Tabrizi, M. A.; Pavani,
M. G.; Romagnoli, R. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2004, 14, 71.
4. Bruns, R. F.; Fergus, J. H. Mol. Pharmacol. 1990, 38, 939.
5. Bruns, R. F.; Fergus, J. H.; Coughenour, L. L.; Court-
land, G. G.; Pugsley, T. A.; Dodd, J. H.; Tinney, F. J.
Mol. Pharmacol. 1990, 38, 950.
Since many known allosteric enhancers are also adeno-
sine A1 receptor antagonists at some (usually higher)
concentration, the fact that most of the synthesized
compounds did not show a greater efficacy than did
10 lM PD 81,723 could be explained by possible antag-
onist properties. Compounds 3a–j were tested at a con-
centration of 10 lM for their ability to displace the
binding of [3H]DPCPX, [3H]ZM 241385, and
[3H]MRE-3008F20 to the ligand binding site of CHO:-
hA1, CHO:hA2A, and CHO:hA3 adenosine receptors
(AR), respectively (Table 2).13
6. Kourounakis, A.; Visser, C.; DE Groote, M.; Ijzerman, A.
P. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001, 61, 137.
7. Bhattacharya, S.; Linden, J. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1995,
1265, 15.
The prototype enhancer, PD 81,723, did not inhibit the
binding of a radiolabeled antagonist to A1 and A2A
receptors, but it reduced by 21% the binding of
[3H]MRE-3008F20 to the A3 receptor. None of the
selected compounds inhibited binding at the hA2AAR
and hA3AR, but some derivatives (3b, 3f, and 3j) inhib-
ited binding to the hA1 AR to some extent (35–50%).
For the only compound of this series active as an alloste-
ric enhancer (3h), it was possible to achieve a good sep-
aration between enhancing activity and binding to the
orthosteric site, being devoid of antagonist activity on
A1, A2A, and A3 receptors.
8. (a) Baraldi, P. G.; Zaid, A. N.; Lampronti, I.; Fruttarolo,
F.; Pavani, M. G.; Tabrizi, M. A.; Shryock, J. C.; Leung,
E.; Romagnoli, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10,
1953; (b) Van der Klein, P. A. M.; Kourounakis, A. P.;
IJzerman, A. P. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3629; (c)
Kourounakis, A. P.; Visser, C.; de Groote, M.; IJzerman,
A. P. Drug Dev. Res. 2000, 51, 207; (d) Tranberg, C. E.;
Zickgraf, A.; Giunta, B. N.; Luetjens, H.; Figler, H.;
Murphree, L. J.; Falke, R.; Fleischer, H.; Linden, J.;
Scammells, P. J.; Olsson, R. A. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
382; (e) Lutjens, H.; Zickgraf, A.; Fingler, H.; Linden, J.;
¨
Olsson, R. A.; Scammels, P. J. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
1870; (f) Nikolakopoulos, G.; Figler, H.; Linden, J.;
Scammells, P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 2358.
9. Bremner, D. H.; Dunn, A. D.; Wilson, K. A.; Sturrock, K.
R.; Wishart, G. Synthesis 1998, 1095.
In conclusion, we have reported a new and general
methodology for the construction of a series of 2-ami-
no-3-aroyl-thieno[2,3-c]pyridines as potential allosteric
enhancer at the A1-adenosine receptor. This route is
convenient for its simplicity, availability of starting
materials, and good yields obtained. One compound
10. Gewald, K.; Schinke, E.; Bo¨ettcher, H. Chem. Ber. 1966,
99, 94.
11. For the synthesis of 4a–h, see Ref. 8b, 4i: (a) Baraldi, P.
G.; Romagnoli, R.; Pavani, M. G.; Nunez, M. C.; Tabrizi,
M. T.; Shryock, J. C.; Leung, E.; Moorman, A. R.;
Uluoghu, C.; Iannotta, V.; Merighi, S.; Borea, P. A. J.
Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 794; 4j: (b) Baraldi, P. G.; Pavani,
M. G.; Shryock, J. C.; Iannotta, V.; Merighi, S.; Borea, P.
A.; Moorman, A. R.; Romagnoli, R. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 39, 855.
12. A stock solution (10 mM) of each compound was
prepared in DMSO at the initial time of use and stored
at À20 °C. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing
recombinant human A1-adenosine receptors were used to
test A1-adenosine receptor allosteric enhancers. These cells
expressed the A1 receptor at a density of approximately
5 pmol/mg cellular protein. Cells were grown in 48-well
culture plates with Ham’s F12 culture medium, fetal bovine
serum, and antibiotic G-418 for 48–72 h (1 day preconflu-
ent). To begin an experiment, the culture medium was
removed from each well, and warm Hanks’ balanced salt
solution (HBSS) was added. This wash solution was
removed after 6 min at 37 °C and replaced with fresh
HBSS solution that included adenosine deaminase
Table 2. Percent Inhibition activity of enhancer compounds 3a–j
a
b
c
Compound
hA1
hA2A
hA3
3a
3b
0
50
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3c
3d
0
0
0
3e
0
0
3f
3g
45
0
0
0
3h
3i
0
0
0
0
3j
PD 81,723
35
0
0
21
Inhibition activity was expressed as percent displacement value
( STD, n = 3) of 1 nM of [3H]DPCPXa, [3H]ZM 241385b or [3H]MRE
3008F20c by 10 lM of tested compound.