truly efficient, diverse synthetic scheme6 for type 1 indoles
is still required to construct further indole libraries for
medicinal chemistry.
Our strategy for the synthesis of type 1 indoles involves
a three-component aza-Friedel-Crafts (AFC) reaction7 in
water8 (Scheme 1). The AFC product 4 contains a reactive
velopment of selective three-component AFC reactions with
aromatic aldehydes, primary amines, and indoles.
Recently our group has developed several acid-catalyzed
C-C bond-forming reactions in water.12,13 On the basis of
these findings, we first searched for an efficient catalyst in
the model three-component AFC reaction of 2-naphthalde-
hyde (2-NpCHO), o-anisidine (H2N-OMP), and 1-methylin-
dole (1-MeInd) in water (Table 1). Although AcOH and TFA
Scheme 1. Synthetic Scheme of 3-Substituted Indoles Using
AFC Reactions
Table 1. Effect of Catalysts
C-N bond, which could be easily transformed to various
functional groups. However, three-component AFC reactions
of aromatic aldehydes, primary amines, and indoles are to
the best of our knowledge unknown, because the initial
product 4 is highly reactive and further addition of indoles
gives undesired adduct 5 (Scheme 2).9,10 In addition, aromatic
entry
catalyst
none
AcOH
TFA
Sc(DS)3
DBSA
C9H19COOH
C5H11COOH
C7H15COOH
C8H17COOH
4a/5aa
yield of 4a (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
3.3:1
5
5
6
46
65
80 (3b, 4c)
6
43
63
78
45
28
91
5.2:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
Scheme 2. Side Pathways of AFC Reactions
9
10
11
12
13
C
C
C
10H21COOH
11H23COOH
13H27COOH
C9H19COOHd
a Determined by 1H NMR analysis. b Reaction in CH2Cl2. c Reaction in
THF. d 10 mol % of catalyst was used.
did not show any catalytic ability for the system (entries 2
and 3), scandium tris(dodesyl sulfate) (Sc(DS)3) and do-
decylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA), which are known as
effective catalysts for three-component Mannich reactions
in water,13 promoted the reaction effectively; however, a
certain amount of undesired adduct 5a was formed (entries
4 and 5). After screening other catalysts, it was revealed that
decanoic acid (C9H19COOH) efficiently promoted the reac-
tion without formation of 5a (entry 6). Interestingly, this
efficient catalysis occurred sluggishly in organic solvents
such as CH2Cl2 and THF (entry 6, in parentheses). Further-
more, the length of the alkyl chains of the carboxylic acids
was found to be crucial for this reaction. Decanoic acid
(C9H19COOH) gave the best result, and it was noted that
use of carboxylic acids with shorter or longer alkyl chains
resulted in lower yields (entries 7-12). Finally, it was
discovered that increasing the catalyst loading could further
improve the yield of the desired product (entry 13).14
aldehydes are themselves known to react with indoles directly
to afford the undesired bisindolyl products 5.11 In an effort
to address these shortcomings, we initially undertook de-
(5) (a) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Tommasi, S.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Synlett
2005, 1199. (b) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 550. (c) Comins, D. L.; Stroud, E. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 1869.
(6) (a) Schreiber, S. L. Chem. Eng. News 2003, 81, 51. (b) Spring, D.
R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3867.
(7) For recent examples of AFC reactions of R-iminoesters, see: (a) Zhao,
J.-L.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.-B.; Wu, Y.-C.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J. Synlett 2006,
96. (b) Jiang, B.; Huang, Z.-G. Synthesis 2005, 2198. (c) Johannsen, M.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 2233.
(8) For Friedel-Crafts-type reactions in water, see: (a) Zhuang, W.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1336. (b) Manabe, K.; Aoyama,
N.; Kobayashi, S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 174.
(9) (a) Ke, B.; Qin, Y.; He, Q.; Huang, Z.; Wang, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 1751. (b) Mi, X.; Luo, S.; He, J.; Cheng, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 4567. (c) Xie. W.; Bloomfield, K. M.; Jin, Y.; Dolney, N. Y.;
Wang, P. G. Synlett 1999, 498.
(10) A few examples of selective AFC reactions of indoles to aryl imines
were reported; see: (a) Jia, Y.-X.; Xie, J.-H.; Duan, H.-F.; Wang, L.-X.;
Zhou, Q.-L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1621. (b) Esquivias, J.; Go´mez Arraya´s,
R.; Carretero, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 629. (c) Wang, Y.-
Q.; Song, J.; Hong, R.; Li, H.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
8156.
(11) For recent examples, see: (a) Deb, M. L.; Bhuyan, P. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 1441. (b) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Sunitha, S. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 349.
(12) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Manabe, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 209. (b)
Hamada, T.; Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1205. (c)
Azoulay, S.; Manabe, K.; Kobayashi, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4593.
(13) (a) Manabe, K.; Mori, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57,
2537. (b) Manabe, K.; Mori, Y.; Wakabayashi, T.; Nagayama, S.;
Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7202.
4940
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 21, 2006