CLUSTER
2329
Concerning Lewis Acid Promoted, Directing-Group-Free Epoxide-Ring-
Opening Cascades
E
poxide-Ring-O
i
pening
m
Cascades othy P. Heffron,1 Timothy F. Jamison*
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemistry, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Fax +1(617)3240253; E-mail: tfj@mit.edu
Received 2 May 2006
H
H
H
H
H
Cs2CO3,
CsF
(a)
HO
Me
HO
O
O
Abstract: Lewis acid promoted cascades of a tris(disubstituted ep-
oxide) triggered by silver-promoted abstraction of a bromide ion fa-
vors trans-dioxabicyclo[4.3.0]nonanes, rather than diads or triads
of tetrahydropyrans (trans-dioxabicylco[4.4.0]decanes, for exam-
ple). These results suggest that an epoxide-attacking-epoxonium
mechanism is not operative in this system.
Me3Si
O
O
Me
MeOH,
reflux
O
O
O
O
Me3Si
H
H
H
H
Me3Si
Me3Si
ref. 3
(b)
H
H
H
HO
Me
O
O
O
Key words: epoxides, cascade, ring opening, fused-ring systems,
Lewis acids
Me
OH
O
this work
O
O
H
H
H
Scheme 1
In the past twenty years significant effort has been direct-
ed toward the development of methods that prepare trans-
syn-trans polyether frameworks (‘ladder’ polyethers) by
way of sequential epoxide-opening reactions. The inspira-
tion for all of these ‘cascades’ can be traced to a hypothe-
sis that Nakanishi put forth in 1985 in order to account for
the structural and stereochemical regularities found in the
class of natural products that feature the ladder polyether
framework.2 We recently described a new strategy of this
genre, one in which a trimethylsilyl (Me3Si) group con-
trols the regioselectivity of epoxide-opening, and immedi-
ately thereafter, is removed via protiodesilylation
(Scheme 1).3 That is, the starting materials contain up to
three epoxysilanes, but the final products of the cascades
contain no Me3Si groups.
(Y+), such as a Lewis or Brønsted acid or a carbonium ion;
(2) the oxygen of the next nearest epoxide (B) attacks the
carbon at which the developing positive charge is better
stabilized (tertiary vs. secondary carbocation, in the ex-
ample shown), affording an intermediate that can be rep-
resented by an epoxonium species; (3) the oxygen of the
next epoxide (C) can now attack one of two carbons,
where (a) fragmentation of the C–O bond indicated in red
represents exo opening of the epoxide and leads to a five-
membered ring and an oxabicyclo[2.1.0]pentane, or (b)
fragmentation of the other (blue) C–O bond leads to a six-
membered ring (endo) and an oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane.
The latter, an endo ring-opening process (b), is required
for the formation of the ladder polyether framework, and
might be expected to be favored because it leads to the less
strained of two possible oxabicyclic ring systems. Repeti-
tion of steps 1–3 above would lead to an extended, ladder-
like array of trans-syn-trans-fused tetrahydropyrans
(THPs).
Herein, we report preliminary investigations of related
cascades of oligo(disubstituted epoxides) (Scheme 1). In
principle, these oligoepoxides would afford the same
types of products as the oligo(epoxysilanes), trans-syn-
trans polyethers in which a hydrogen atom is found at
both carbon atoms of each ring junction. In contrast to the
Me3Si-directed epoxide-opening cascades, these may be
considered to be ‘directing-group-free’.
In the model proposed above, a starting material contain-
ing at least three epoxides (A, B, and C) is required.
Murai5 investigated some aspects of this hypothesis in de-
tail with a diepoxide (1, Scheme 3), in which the electro-
philic species (Y+, see Scheme 2) is generated by
abstraction by a silver cation of a bromide atom that is
tethered to the epoxide. This design feature is ingenious in
that not only is it orthogonal to the rest of the system (i.e.,
selective for bromide abstraction over epoxide activa-
tion), but also engenders developing positive charge at
one specific carbon.
The fundamental requirement of these cascades is that an
epoxide is sufficiently nucleophilic to open another ep-
oxide that has been activated by a Brønsted or Lewis ac-
id.4 This framework also tests whether or not there may be
an inherent preference for endo-type over exo-type ep-
oxide ring-opening, thus favoring the formation of the
larger of two possible oxygen heterocyclic rings.
Such selectivity might be obtained under the following se-
quence of events (Scheme 2): (1) the cascade is initiated
by the reaction of epoxide A with an electrophilic species
Nevertheless, there are two possible mechanistic frame-
works that account for Murai’s results, one of which does
not involve an epoxide-attacking-epoxonium event
(Scheme 3). Since the formation of products containing
two fused THPs (a THP ‘diad’) were not observed, these
two mechanisms cannot be differentiated. More impor-
SYNLETT 2006, No. 14, pp 2329–2333
0
1
.0
9
.2
0
0
6
Advanced online publication: 24.08.2006
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-949637; Art ID: Y00406ST
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York