to the tether.6 In contrast to this finding, it was necessary to
heat the unsubstituted amidofuran 11 for 1 week at 110 °C
in order to complete the cycloaddition of 11 to 13. Alter-
natively, furans 7 and 8 could directly be converted to
cycloadducts 13 and 14 by conducting the N-allylation at
reflux temperatures. After 48 h, the bromofuran 8 was
completely transformed to cycloadduct 14, whereas the
unsubstituted variant 7 gave a mixture of 11 (40%) and
cycloadduct 13 (48%).
Scheme 1a
The rate enhancement observed by incorporating a halogen
at the 5-position appears to be general.7 Accordingly, when
the analogous 5-chloro- and 5-iodofurans 9 and 10 were
subjected to the allylation conditions in benzene at reflux,
cycloadducts 15 and 16 were isolated in 92 and 94% yields,
respectively.
The presence of the bromo substituent also dramatically
influenced the rate of the IMDAF cyclization of substituted
alkene tethers. For example, while the cycloaddition of 17
was only 40% complete after 6 days of constant heating at
80 °C, bromofuran 18 was completely converted to 20 after
only 36 h.8
The origin of the increased rate of cycloaddition for the
halo-substituted furans when compared to unsubstituted
examples is unclear.7 While FMO theory predicts that
electron-releasing groups should facilitate a normal-demand
Diels-Alder reaction,9 predicting the electronic effect of a
halo group is complicated by their σ-withdrawing nature
juxtaposed with their weak π-donating ability. Recent
theoretical work, however, predicts the transition state-
stabilizing effect of halogen substituents in the Diels-Alder
reaction and suggests that this is a result of the high
polarizability of these substituents.10
The remarkable enhancement in the rate of the cycload-
dition involving bromofurans, combined with our recent
success with cycloadditions across an indole C(2)-C(3)
π-bond,2a prompted us to examine these reactions in the
context of a (()-morphine synthesis.11 Ciganek had previ-
ously reported the intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of
21 to provide the ACDE core 22, albeit in only 10% yield
(Scheme 3).12 R-Pyrone derivative 23, however, produced
24 in 53% yield. Inspired by this report, we envisioned an
IMDAF reaction of furanyl amide 26 to furnish the cycload-
duct 25.
a Reagents: (a) Rh2(OAc)4, PhH, 2; (b) xylenes, 145 °C, 36%.
an initial intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of furan 2 to
give oxabicycle 3. Fragmentation of the oxabridge results
in a zwitterionic intermediate 4, which can ketonize with
the expulsion of a bromide ion, producing oxonium ion 5.
The ejected bromide ion then attacks the oxonium ion at the
adjacent methylene position, leading to the observed product.
Intrigued by these initial results, we decided to examine
related systems that could provide polyfunctional oxabi-
cycles. Thus, 5-bromo-2-furoyl amide 12 was prepared by
N-allylation of the secondary amide 8 under phase transfer
conditions (Scheme 2). Heating a sample of furan 12 at 110
°C for 90 min provided the stable oxatricycle 14 as a single
diastereomer, resulting from an exo cyclization with respect
Scheme 2a
(6) Padwa, A.; Brodney, M. A.; Satake, K.; Straub, C. S. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 4617-4626.
(7) For a study of substituent effects in related IMDAF reactions, see:
Klepo, Z.; Jakop, K. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987, 24, 1787-1791.
(8) Slow conversion of furan 17 to oxabicyclo 19 (40%) over a 6 day
period was followed every 24 h and was shown not to be the result of a
retro Diels-Alder equilibrium.
(9) Sustmann, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 2721-2724.
(10) Robiette, R.; Marchand-Brynaert, J.; Peeters, D. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 6823-6826.
(11) (a) Sza´ntay, C.; Do¨rnyel, G.; Blasko´, G. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry
and Pharmacology; Cordell, G. A., Brossi, A., Eds.; Academic Press:
London, 1994; Vol. 45, pp 127-232. (b) Maier, M. In Organic Synthesis
Highlights II; Waldmann, H., Ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1995; pp 357-369.
(c) Hudlicky, T.; Butora, G.; Fearnley, S. P.; Gum, A. G.; Stabile, M. R. In
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Rahman, A.-u., Ed.; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1996; Vol. 18, pp 43-154. (d) Novak, B. H.; Hudlicky, T.
Reed, J. W.; Mulzer, J.; Trauner, D. Curr. Org. Chem. 2000, 4, 343-362.
(e) Bentley, K. W. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 247-268. (f) Blakemore, P.
R.; White, J. D. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1159-1168.
a Reagents: (a) NaOH, K2CO3, n-Bu4NHSO4, allyl bromide,
PhH, rt (11 or 12) or 2; (b) PhCH3, 2, 1 week (13, 90%) or 90 min
(1, 100%); (c) PhH, 2, 6 days (19, 60%) or 36 h (20, 82%).
(12) Ciganek, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6261-6162.
3338
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 18, 2003