Figure 4a is not fully discarded, its participation would also
be questioned because it requires a large conformational
change to attain the coordinated arrangement 15.
EtOH)), having the R absolute configuration (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3
Also, diol 16e was obtained from 12e in 80% yield ([R]24
)
+35.5 (c ) 0.2, EtOH); lit.11 [R]24 ) +41.2 (c ) 1.2,
EtOH)). From these representative chemical correlations, and
from the X-ray structure of 12j, it is assumed that all
remaining carbinols possess the same absolute configuration.
Of particular interest is the preparation of diol 16c, a key
precursor12 for the synthesis of fungicide 17 (Scheme 3). This
goal was achieved by applying the same oxidative hydroly-
sis-reduction protocol to carbinol 12c, which allowed access
to the precursor 16c in 78% yield ([R]25 ) +59.5 (c ) 0.25,
EtOH)), this being the first time that diol 16c was prepared
in its optically pure form. The synthesis of 17 was completed
as shown in Scheme 3.12
In conclusion, the synthesis of 9 was achieved in two steps
and 70% overall yield from 10. The highly diastereoselective
nucleophilic additions performed on 9 with several kinds of
nucleophiles overcome the limitation of chiral auxiliaries
1-7 when they are reacted with less chelating and less
diastereoselective nucleophiles, such as lithium alkylides and
LiAlH4. The highly diastereofacial discrimination shown by
9 seems important in asymmetric synthesis to prepare chiral
targets in high optical purity, as proven for the highly
diastereoselective synthesis of carbinol 16c, a precursor of
fungicide 17.
Figure 4. (a) Hypothetic chelated TS illustrating how the bridging
gem-dimethyl moiety would block the nucleophilic addition through
the re face. (b) Perspective of the X-ray diagram of 9 showing the
preferred attack by nucleophiles, in which methylene C28 (C-12
in Figure 1) clearly blocks the re face of the carbonyl group.
According to the above arguments, a mechanistic model
that comprises steric effects as the main driving force to
explain the observed diastereoselectivity would be expected.
Analysis of the X-ray structure of 9, viewed in another
perspective in Figure 4b, shows the close proximity of CH2-
18 (C-28 in the X-ray structure) and the prostereogenic
carbonyl group, precluding the nucleophilic attack from the
re face (Figure 4b). It is worth noticing that there is
practically no conformational change of the macrocyclic ring
on going from 9 to 12j (Figures 2 and 3). A very similar
minimum energy conformation for both compounds was
found by calculation (MMFF94, Spartan 04)9 (Figures 2 and
3), suggesting that a significant conformational change of
the macrocyclic ring is not taking place at the TS, and
therefore the CH2-18 group could always preclude addition
of the nucleophile from the re face.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by CONA-
CyT (grant 44157Q) and CGPI-IPN (grants 20030702 and
20040199). MEVD thanks CONACyT (125225) and CGPI/
IPN (PIFI) for postgraduate fellowships.
The stereofacial preference of the nucleophilic addition
to 9 was also confirmed by chemical correlation. Thus,
oxidative hydrolysis of 12a, followed by LiAlH4 reduction
of the resulting mixture, gave diol 16a in 71% yield ([R]24
) -5.7 (c ) 0.5, EtOH); lit.10 [R]24 ) -5.8 (c ) 0.17,
Supporting Information Available: All experimental
procedures and spectroscopic data for new compounds and
crystallographic data for compounds 9 (CCDC 627539) and
12j (CCDC 627540). This material is available free of charge
(8) Cram, D. J.; Kopecky, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 2748.
(9) MMFF94 calculations were performed using the Spartan 04, v. 1.0.1
software package for Windows (Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA, 2004).
(10) Fujisawa, T.; Watai, T.; Sugiyama, T.; Ukaji, Y. Chem. Lett. 1989,
2045-2048 and references cited therein.
OL062319F
(11) Colombo, L.; Di Giacomo, M.; Brusotti, G.; Milano, E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 2863.
(12) Kraatz, U. Ger. Patent DE 3703082 AI 19880811, 1988.
16
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007