T. Guo et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 613–615
615
3. For a recent review of heterocycle synthesis from 3-
(dimethylamino)propenoates and related enaminones, see:
Stanovnik, B.; Svete, J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2433–2480.
4. (a) Jakse, R.; Svete, J.; Stanovnik, B.; Golobic, A.
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4601–4608; (b) Westman, J.; Lun-
din, R. Synthesis 2003, 1025–1030; (c) Westman, J.;
Lundin, R.; Stalberg, J.; Ostbye, M.; Franzen, A.;
Hurynowicz, A. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening
2002, 5, 565–570.
5. Boeshagen, H. U.S. 3692795, 1972.
6. Hargrave, K. D.; Hess, F. K.; Oliver, J. T. J. Med. Chem.
1983, 26, 1158–1163.
7. Matsushita, T.; Fujita, A. JP 2001328980, 2001.
8. Konradi, A. W.; Pleiss, M. A.; Thorsett, E. D.; Ashwell,
S.; Welmaker, G. S.; Kreft, A.; Sarantakis, D.; Dressen,
D. B.; Grant, F. S.; Semko, C.; Xu, Y.-Z. WO
2002008222, 2002.
should be noted that conventional heating proved in-
effective for the preparation of 1a–e, for example, treat-
ment of 4 with 5c in AcOH at reflux (120 °C) for 15 h
did not yield any detectable amount of target compound
1c. In contrast, good to excellent yields (44–89%) of tar-
get compounds 1a–e were obtained via condensation of
4 with a-heteroarylamines 5a–e (prepared according to
literature procedures5–8) under microwave conditions
(AcOH, 200–220 °C, 200–600 s).9 Also shown in Table
1 are the MCH1R binding affinities (Ki’s) for 1a–e.10
Compounds 1a–e displayed low to sub-micromolar
Ki’s, with imidazo-pyrimidinone 1d being the most
potent (Ki = 0.077 lM).
In summary, an efficient microwave assisted condensation
of a-heteroarylamines with 3-dimethylamino-2-aryl-pro-
penoates has been developed to synthesize various fused
bi-heterocyclic compounds including isothiazolo-, thiaz-
olo-, imidazo-, and pyrimido-pyrimidinones as novel
MCH1R antagonists.
9. Representative microwave procedure: A mixture of ethyl 3-
(dimethylamino)-2-(3-methoxy-4-(2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethoxy)-
phenyl)acrylate (4) (154 mg, 0.42 mmol) and 5-(4-chloro-
phenyl)-1H-imidazol-2-amine (5d) (82 mg, 0.42 mmol,
prepared according to Ref. 7) in AcOH (0.33 ml) was
heated at 220 °C for 200 s in an Emrys optimizer. The
reaction mixture was then neutralized with 1% KOH in
MeOH to pH ꢀ7. The solvent was evaporated and the
residue was purified using reverse phase prep-HPLC (10–
90% CH3CN/H2O with 0.05% TFA) to give 2-(4-chloro-
phenyl)-6-(3-methoxy-4-(2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethoxy)phenyl)-
imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-5(1H)-one (1d) as a TFA salt
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Laura L. Rokosz and Tara M. Stauf-
fer for their assistance in the MCH1R Ki determination
and Brian A. McKittrick (Schering-Plough) and Doug
W. Hobbs for their valuable comments and suggestions.
1
(154 mg, yield 63%). H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 10.00 (br s,
1H), 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.44 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz),
7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.61 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.53 (m,
1H), 7.32 (d, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz), 4.52 (t, 2H, J = 5.0 Hz),
4.07 (s, 3H), 3.82–3.90 (m, 4H), 3.39 (m, 2H), 2.27 (m,
2H), 2.12 (m, 2H). MS(ESI) m/z 465.2 [(M+H)+].
References and notes
10. MCH1R Ki determination: Membranes prepared from
CHO cells that express human MCH1R (0.1 mg/ml final)
were incubated with wheatgerm–agglutinin (WGA) coated
SPA beads (1 mg/ml final, Amersham Biosciences, Piscat-
away, NJ) in an assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, 10 mM
NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MnCl2, 0.1% BSA pH 7.4)
for 5 min on ice and subsequently washed two times in an
assay buffer. Test compound (5 ll) prepared in DMSO,
DMSO (vehicle) or MCH (2.5 lM final—used to quantify
the non-specific signal) were mixed with 45 ll assay buffer
in 96-well assay plates (Corning #3604). Bead/membrane
mixture (100 ll) was added to the compounds followed by
50 ll of [125I]-MCH (0.5 nM final, Perkin Elmer, Boston,
MA). The assay plates were shaken for 5 min on a plate
shaker and then incubated for 2 h. Binding of [125I]-MCH
to the bead/membrane mixture was detected using a
Microbeta TriluxTM scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer).
The data were fit to a one-site competition binding model
for IC50 determination using the program GraphPad
Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) and Ki
values were calculated using the Cheng–Prusoff equation.
All Ki’s represent the average of two or more determina-
tions. The standard deviations were no greater than 30%
from the mean.
1. For recent reviews of MCH and MCH1R antagonists, see:
(a) Handlon, A. L.; Zhou, H. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
4017–4022; (b) Kowalski, T. J.; McBriar, M. D. Annu.
Rep. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 119–133; (c) Dyke, H. J.; Ray,
N. C. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2005, 15, 1303–1313.
2. (a) Handlon, A. L.; Al-Barazanji, K. A.; Barvian, K. K.;
Bigham, E. C.; Carlton, D. L.; Carpenter, A. J.; Cooper, J.
P.; Daniels, A. J.; Garrison, D. T.; Goetz, A. S.; Green, G.
M.; Grizzle, M. K.; Guo, Y. C.; Hertzog, D. L.; Hyman,
C. E.; Ignar, D. M.; Peckham, G. E.; Speake, J. D.; Britt,
C.; Swain, W. R. In 228th ACS National Meeting,
Philadelphia, PA, 2004; Paper MEDI193; (b) Hertzog,
D. L.; Al-Brazanji, K. A.; Bigham, E. C.; Bishop, M. J.;
Britt, C. S.; Carlton, D. L.; Cooper, J. P.; Daniels, A. J.;
Garrido, D. M.; Goetz, A. S.; Grizzle, M. K.; Guo, Y. C.;
Handlon, A. L.; Ignar, D. M.; Morgan, R. O.; Peat, A. J.;
Tavares, F. X.; Zhou, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006,
16, 4723–4727; (c) Witty, D. R.; Bateson, J.; Hervieu, G.
J.; Al-Barazanji, K.; Jeffrey, P.; Hamprecht, D.; Haynes,
A.; Johnson, C. N.; Muir, A. I.; O’Hanlon, P. J.; Stemp,
G.; Stevens, A. J.; Thewlis, K.; Winborn, K. Y. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4872–4878.