macrocycle. These subtle variations in the structure can play a
major role in the resulting conformation of the octaphyrin leading
to change in the electronic structure and aromaticity. Systematic
studies of these variations on the structure property corelations are
underway.
Notes and references
§ Crystallographic summary for 12: C72H60N2S4Se2, M = 1239.42. Crystals
were grown by slowly diffusing dry n-hexane over a chloroform solution of
12. Blue rectangular, triclinic, P-1, m = 1.134 mm21, Z = 4 in a cell of
˚
˚
˚
dimensions: a = 20.276(4) A, b = 21.240(4) A, c = 21.313(4) A; a =
,
F(000) = 2552. A total of 26051 independent reflections were measured on
81.06(3)u, b = 62.88(3)u, c = 66.62(3)u, V = 7495(3)A , rcal = 1.098 Mg m23
3
˚
a CCD area detector using graphite monochromatized Mo Ka radiation
˚
2
(l = 0.71073 A) at 2173 uC. The structure was refined on F to an Rw =
0.1411, with a conventional R = 0.0614, and a goodness of fit = 0.920 for
1465 parameters using the SHELXTL10 package. CCDC 622228. For
crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/
b614290g.
Fig. 4 Variation of energy of the Soret band(&) and HOMO–LUMO
gap (.) with increasing number of p electrons.
1 J. L. Sessler, A. Gebauer and S. J. Weghorn, The Porphyrin Handbook,
Vol. 2, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, Academic Press,
San Diego, 1999, ch. 9; A. Jasat and D. Dolphin, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97,
2267; E. Vogel, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1996, 33, 1461; T. D. Lash,
Angew. Chem., 2000, 112, 1833; T. D. Lash, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2000, 39, 1763.
2 J. L. Sessler, M. J. Cyr, V. Lynch, E. MaGhee and J. A. Ibers, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 2810; J. L. Sessler, T. Morishima and V. Lynch,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 977; J. L. Sessler, S. J. Weghorn,
V. Lynch and M. R. Johnson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33,
1509; E. Vogel, M. Bro¨ring, J. Fink, D. Rosen, H. Schmickler, J. Lex,
K. W. K. Chan, Y.-D. Wu, D. A. Plattner, M. Nendel and K. N. Houk,
Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 2705; Richard A. Stevens, Casey C. Raymond
and Peter K. Dorhout, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 2511;
J. Setsune and S. Maeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12405;
N. Sprutta and L. Latos-Grazynski, Chem.–Eur. J., 2001, 7, 5099;
D. Siedel, V. Lynch and J. L. Sessler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
1422.
3 J. L. Sessler, D. Seidel and V. Lynch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
11257.
Fig. 5 Single crystal X-ray structure of 12, top view (a) and its side view
(b). Meso substituents in side view are removed for clarity and only one of
the two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit of 12 is shown.
4 M. Bro¨ring, J. Jendrny, L. Zander, H. Schmickler, J. Lex, Y.-D. Wu,
M. Nendel, J. G. Cheng, D. A. Plattner, K. N. Houk and E. Vogel,
Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 2709; Martin Bro¨ring, Jo¨rg Jendrny,
Lars Zander, Hans Schmickler, Johann Lex, Yun-Dong Wu,
Maja Nendel, Jiangang Chen, Dietmar A. Plattner, Kendall N. Houk
and Emanuel Vogel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 2515.
5 E. Vogel, M. Bro¨ring, J. Fink, D. Rosen, H. Schmickler, J. Lex,
K. W. K. Chan, Y.-D. Wu, D. A. Plattner, M. Nendel and K. N. Houk,
Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 2705; Emanuel Vogel, Martin Bro¨ring,
Ju¨rgen Fink, Daniel Rosen, Hans Schmickler, Johann Lex, Kyle
W. K. Chan, Yun-Dong Wu, Dietmar A. Plattner, Maja Nendel and
Kendall N. Houk, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 2511;
H. Rath, J. Sankar, V. Prabhuraja, T. K. Chandrashekar, B. S. Joshi
and R. Ray, Chem. Commun., 2005, 3343.
6 V. G. Anand, S. K. Pushpan, S. Venkatraman, A. Dey,
T. K. Chandrashekar, B. S. Joshi, R. Roy, W. Teng and K. R. Senge,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8620; R. Misra, V. G. Anand, H. Rath
and T. K. Chandrashekar, J. Chem. Sci., 2005, 117, 99.
7 J.-Y. Shin, H. Furuta, K. Yoza, S. Igarashi and A. Osuka, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 7190; N. Sprutta and L. Grazynski, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2001, 7, 5099.
The confirmation of planar structure for 12 came from the
single-crystal X-ray analysis10§ (CCDC-622228). The structure
shown in Fig. 5 confirms the inversion of both the selenophene
rings. There are two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit
and the inverted biselenophene unit, having different dihedral
angles (9.52 and 22.6u) with respect to the mean plane defined by
four meso carbon atoms. The molecules deviate slightly from
planarity as seen in side view (Fig. 5b). NMR studies also support
such an observation where the degree of inversion of the
biselenophene unit depends on the amount of TFA added and
at excess TFA concentration, the biselenophene unit comes into
the plane as defined by the four meso carbons. And the macrocycle
adopts a planar conformation.
In summary, it has been shown that: (a) use of rigid
quaterthiophene subunit as one of the precursors restricts the ring
inversion only on the tertapyrrane subunit unlike in 4, where both
the subunits are involved in ring inversions; (b) variation of X in
the tetrapyrrane moiety has no bearing on the ring inversions; (c)
reduction in the steric bulk of the meso substituents in the
tetrapyrrane moiety did not result in the twisting of the
8 D. Seidel, V. Lynch and J. L. Sessler, Angew. Chem., 2002, 114, 1480;
Daniel Seidel,, Vincent Lynch and Jonathan L. Sessler, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1422.
9 T. K. Ahn, J. H. Kwon, D. Y. Kim, D. W. Cho, D. H. Jeong, S. K. Kim,
M. Suzuki, S. Shimizu, A. Osuka and D. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 12856; H. Rath, J. Sankar, V. PrabhuRaja, T. K. Chandrashekar,
A. Nag and D. Goswami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 11608.
10 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97, University of Go¨ttingen, 1997.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 43–45 | 45