Abyssomicin C, Atrop-abyssomicin C, and Abyssomicin D
A R T I C L E S
Table 1. Optimization of the Lewis-Acid Templated Diels-Alder
Reaction between (()-28 and Methyl Acrylate
use of 3 equiv of 33 is less than ideal, the auxiliary could be
removed by washing with aqueous 2 M HCl and recovered (80%
recovery) by careful neutralization with concentrated NH4OH.
We suspect that the requirement for excess auxiliary is a
consequence of the relatively poor affinity between Mg(II) and
amine.
Enantioselective Synthesis of the Oxabicyclic[2.2.2]octane
Core. With a productive and selective Diels-Alder cycloaddtion
in hand, we returned to the enantioselective synthesis of the
tetronate core as shown in Scheme 3. Alkylation of the known
Weinreb amide 3420 with lithiothioanisole17 afforded the ketone
35 in 81% yield. Corey’s Me-(R)-CBS catalyst21 and cat-
echolborane served to reduce this ketone enantioselectively,
affording hydroxy compound 28 in 90% ee and 95% yield. As
expected from a literature precedent,22 and confirmed by the
eventual conversion of 28 to abyssomicin C (1), this reaction
occurs with the diene behaving as the larger of the two ketone
substituents in the putative transition state 36 (Scheme 3).
Subjecting our now enantio-enriched diene to the previously
described Diels-Alder conditions afforded the adduct 27 as a
single diastereomer (80% yield), presumably through the
transition state 37. The desired hydroxy lactone 26 was prepared
from this adduct via R-hydroxylation in 74% yield, setting the
stage for the key Julia-type reductive elimination. Our early
approaches toward this goal employing less direct methods,
specifically oxidation to the corresponding sulfone followed by
reduction with Na(Hg) amalgam15 or Mg(0)/HgCl2,23 were met
with little success. It was then discovered that the direct
reduction of the thioether at C8 proceeds smoothly with a
catalytically generated lithium 4,4′-di-tert-butylbiphenyl radical
anion.24 The resulting carbanion causes an elimination reaction
that fractures the lactone, leading simultaneously to the requisite
olefin at C9 and a carboxlate anion. Methylation of the latter
functionality with MeI in the same reaction vessel proceeded
better than an isolation/methylation sequence leading to the
skipped diene 23 in 99% yield. A vanadium directed epoxidation
of the C11-C12 olefin was then attempted with VO(acac)2 and
t-BuOOH.25 While this delivered the intended epoxide with
complete stereo- and regiocontrol, the reaction was inefficient,
requiring repeated addition of the catalyst to push the reaction
to completion (up to 0.4 equiv). We found that we could
improve the efficiency of this process using rarely employed
a Addition of base was performed at 0 °C before addition of methyl
acrylate (10 equiv) and warming to 55 °C. b Reaction times reflect the time
at which consumption of the diene was complete as measured by 1H NMR
spectroscopy on the crude reaction mixture unless stated otherwise. c Isolated
yield unless stated otherwise. d Reaction performed according to the
conditions summarized in Figure 5. e Reaction stopped before completion
affording 80% of recovered diene. f Trace product detected in the 1H NMR
spectrum of recovered diene.
enhance the rate of cycloaddition. We thus attempted to generate
the diastereomeric mixture of (()-28-Zn(II)-(()-BINOL-
MgBr complexes following the established protocol16 (Table
1), and to our surprise, only trace amounts of (()-27 were
detected; however, decomposition of the diene was slowed,
leading to 80% starting material recovery after 24 h (entry 2).
In a parallel experiment, BINOL was replaced with catechol
(31, entry 3), which led to a substantial improvement (35%
yield), along with complete diene decomposition after 36 h.
Optimistic that the catechol system was catalyzing the intended
cycloaddition, albeit slowly, we investigated the structurally
similar 2-aminophenols. It was reasoned that in this reaction
manifold, the Lewis basic amine would interact with the Mg-
(II) salt of the diene while the Mg(II) bound to the phenol would
serve to activate and orient the incoming dienophile. Using
commercial 2-aminophenol (32, entry 4) with 2 equiv of
MeMgBr led to an immediate increase in reaction turnover,
affording a 49% yield of (()-27 with complete consumption
of (()-28 after 24 h. Auxiliaries possessing alkylated nitrogen
including the commercially available 2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)phenol
3319 exhibited a slower rate of cycloaddition, along with an
extended lifetime of the diene. Encouraged by these results, the
number of equivalents of 33 and MeMgBr was incremented
(entries 6 and 7) causing the yield of (()-27 to climb up to
80% with 3 equiv of 33 and 4 equiv of MeMgBr. Although the
26
VO(OEt)3 (0.2 equiv) with the same stoichiometric oxidant,
a protocol that afforded the desired epoxide in 93% yield as a
single stereoisomer. Routine acetylation of the free alcohol then
afforded the acetoxy methyl ester 15 (95% yield), setting the
stage for the key Dieckmann condensation reaction. Deproto-
nation of 15 with 2.5 equiv of LiHMDS at -78 °C, followed
by warming to room temperature9a,10,13 and quenching with
saturated aqueous NH4Cl,10 generated the tetronic acid 14, which
was not isolated. Instead, the aqueous/organic mixture was
heated to reflux for 2 h, effecting the intramolecular trapping
(20) Hiyama, T.; Reddy, G. B.; Minami, T.; Hanamoto, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1995, 68, 350-363.
(21) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986-2012.
(22) Cho, B. T.; Choi, O. K.; Kim, D. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13,
697-703.
(23) Lee, G. H.; Lee, H. K.; Choi, E. B.; Kim, B. T.; Pak, C. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 5607-5608.
(19) (a) 2-(Dimethylamino)phenol was also used with near identical results. (b)
Commercially available from a number of sources; however, we prepared
this compound by reaction of 2-aminophenol (1.0 equiv) with 1,4-
dibromobutane (1.05 equiv) and i-Pr2NEt (3.0 equiv) in toluene (1.3 M) at
65 °C for 12 h (see Supporting Information).
(24) Cohen, T.; Bhupathy, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 152-161.
(25) Tanaka, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Nozaki, H.; Sharpless, K. B.; Michaels, R. C.;
Cutting, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 5254-5255.
(26) Evans, J. M.; Kallmerten, J. Synlett 1992, 269-271.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 2, 2007 433