J. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 6298–6302
6301
Table 3
Comparison of experimental and computed chemical shifts for 3k_i
13C Chemical shifts (ppm) 1H Chemical shifts (ppm)
Expt.
Computeda
Expt.
Computeda
144.82
143.34
137.12
131.10
128.91
128.67
127.61
120.40
117.02
115.45
103.70
93.01
142.99
142.02
138.33
133.84
127.10
127.09
126.82
117.68
114.55
113.14
102.08
91.85
7.41
7.40
7.40
7.10
7.04
6.97
5.74
4.98
4.67
4.12
3.57
2.88
7.36
7.32
7.28
6.98
6.89
6.84
6.02
4.80
4.55
3.73
3.28
2.74
Figure 2. X-ray Chrystallography of 4-(7-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)-3-phenyl-2,3-dihy-
drobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-2-yl)morpholine 3k_ii.
76.03
67.05
75.18
65.44
65.45
64.03
48.24
47.42
Results and discussion
CMADb
Largest
1.64
CMADb
Largest
outlier
0.17
Dd = 0.39
D
d = 2.74
Our reaction scheme involves IBX oxidation of substituted
phenols to generate o-quinones 1, which undergo in situ cycloaddi-
tion with enamines 2 to produce the 1,4-benzodioxin scaffold 3
(Scheme 1, Tables 1 and 2 entry 1). Enamines 2 were generally
prepared by direct nucleophilic addition of secondary amines to
aldehydes and subsequent elimination to produce predominantly
trans products (Scheme 1, entry 2). Retention of the trans stereo-
chemistry of the enamine in the Diels–Alder adducts was
confirmed via 1H NMR coupling constants of the Diels–Alder adducts.
1,4-Benzodioxins were obtained from a variety of starting
phenols (Tables 1 and 2) in yields ranging from 22% to 80%. Current
reaction conditions typically produced nearly equal mixtures of
regioisomers (ranging from 62:38 to 57:43), as identified via 1H
NMR (see Table 2, entry 3 as an example). Regioisomers 3k_i and
3k_ii were separated using HPLC on a semi-preparative normal
phase column. The structure of 3k_ii was identified using X-ray
diffraction crystallography (XRD, Fig. 2).12 In addition, density
functional theory calculations were performed to compute NMR
chemical shifts of these regioisomers in order to assess the feasibil-
ity of assigning 1,4-benzodioxin regioisomeric mixtures without
the need for chromatography.13,14 As shown in Tables 3 and 4,
computed 1H and 13C chemical shifts were found to be in excellent
agreement with experimental data for both regioisomers, with
average deviations of ꢀ1.7 ppm for 13C shifts and ꢀ0.17 ppm for
1H shifts for each structure. However, it is also clear from the data
that the chemical shift profiles for the two structures are too
similar to assign them based on CMAD (corrected mean absolute
deviations) comparisons between experiment and theory alone.
Therefore, we employed the CP3 statistical analysis developed by
Smith and Goodman for the purpose of assigning closely related
structures based on experimental and computed chemical shifts
when both sets of data are available for both isomers.15 When
the data in Tables 3 and 4 were used as input without specific
assignment restrictions, the CP3 analysis matched the experimen-
tal data sets to the correct 3k_i and 3k_ii regioisomeric structures
(100% probability based on 13C data, 99.7% probability based on 1H
data and 100% probability overall). Thus it appears, at least for this
example, that such NMR calculations, in conjunction with the CP3
analysis, can reliably identify the components of these mixtures,
provided that each set is sufficiently resolved in the spectra.
In order to study the regioselectivity of these reactions, the
outcome of reacting various o-quinones (1a–1f) with enamines
(2a–2h) was examined. o-Quinones 1e (prepared in six steps
from 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, Scheme 2)16 and 1f
were examined to determine if a strong electron donating group
(–OMe, –OBn) would show regioselectivity, but no improvement of
outlier
a
See Supplementary data complete for assignment details and additional
comparisons.
n
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
P
b
1
n
CMAD = corrected mean absolute deviation and is computed as
where dcomp refers to the scaled computed chemical shifts.
dcomp À dexp
i
Table 4
Comparison of experimental and computed chemical shifts for 3k_ii
13C Chemical shifts (ppm) 1H Chemical shifts (ppm)
Expt. Expt.
Computeda Computeda
144.32
143.91
137.08
132.00
128.94
128.69
127.65
119.62
117.01
115.35
103.73
92.93
76.18
67.07
65.49
48.27
CMADb
Largest outlier
142.59
142.41
137.78
134.80
127.44
127.14
126.54
116.51
114.73
112.85
102.08
91.70
7.13
7.42
7.41
7.40
6.98
6.94
5.76
4.99
4.67
4.09
3.56
2.87
7.00
7.35
7.34
7.31
6.84
6.78
6.03
4.83
4.43
3.75
3.29
2.73
75.23
65.43
64.07
47.41
1.66
CMADb
Largest outlier
0.17
Dd = 0.34
D
d = 3.11
a
See Supplementary data for complete assignment details and additional
comparisons.
b
CMAD = corrected mean absolute deviation and is computed as
dcomp À dexp where dcomp refers to the scaled computed chemical shifts.
n
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
P
1
n
ꢀ
i
regioselectivity was indicated by 1H NMR (Table 2, entries 5 and
6). Compound 1c was chosen to explore how a bulky group (t-butyl)
ortho to the dione would affect the reaction (Table 2, entry 2). The
reaction took a longer time (over 48 h vs less than 24 h for most reac-
tions) and the crude product contained a large quantity of unreacted
enamine, which contributed to the low yield of that reaction.
Enamines 2b and 2h were prepared in order to explore how
electron donating groups in the enamine affect regioselectivity
compared to their parent compounds 2a and 2g (Table 1, entries
1, 2, 7 and 8). In general, electron donating groups on the aromatic
rings make the enamine electron rich and increase the energy of
the HOMO of the dienophile, enabling a more appropriate overlap
of the molecular orbitals for the inverse electron demand Diels–Al-
der reaction.17 With the electron donating groups lowering the