I. Borza et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 406–409
407
O
O
COOCH3
OCH3
OCH3
ii
i
R
R
R
+
OCH3
6-BnO
NH2
N
H
N
COOCH3
H
O
O
H
H
H
5 R =
15 R =
16 R =
10 R =
11 R =
13 R =
3-BnO,
4-NO2
O
4-BnO
7-BnO,
6-NO2
3-BnO,
4-NO2
O
4-BnO
6 R =
7 R =
17 R =
12 R =
H
N
H
N
R =
R =
R =
8
9
18
19
20
iii,
iv
6-AcNH
H
N
R = 3,4-
14
R = 3,4-
O
O
O
R = 6,7-
O
O
O
Y
v, vi
viii
R
R
OH
N
N
H
Z
N
H
O
O
H
H
28 R =
21 R =
22 R =
24 R =
7-BnO,
7-OH,
6-BnO
6-OH
7-OH,
6-OH
30 a-g R =
H
N
23 R =
25 R =
29 R =
31 R =
vii
6-AcNH
6-AcNH
H
N
O
R =
R = 6,7-
32
26
27
O
O
R = 6,7-
O
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) MeOH, reflux, 2 h; (ii) Dowtherm, 240 °C, 10 min; (iii) H2, 10% Pd/C, MeOH, rt; (iv) Ac2O, reflux;
(v) NaOH, MeOH, H2O, rt; (vi) HCl; (vii) H2, 10% Pd/C, MeOH, rt; (viii) piperidine derivs., HBTU, Et3N, DMF, rt.
acids (24 and 25), however, were prepared from their
O-benzyl derivatives by catalytic hydrogenolysis. The
synthesis of quinazoline derivative 38 started from com-
mercially available 4-hydroxyanthranilic acid and pro-
ceeded according to Scheme 2. The anthranilamide 36
was prepared via standard procedures in six steps. The
quinazoline ring was obtained by thermal condensation
of the oxalic acid diamide 37 and catalytic hydrogenol-
ysis of O-benzyl protecting group afforded the end-prod-
uct. The IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and MS spectra for all
intermediates and final compounds were consistent with
the assigned structures. Moreover, the purity of the sam-
ples was checked by HPLC and HRMS analysis.
the analogous 5- and 6-hydroxyindole-2-carboxamides
(2 and 3), which were almost equiactive, 7-hydroxyky-
nurenic acid amid 29 was significantly less active than
its 6-hydroxy analogue 30a. Among the 6-hydroxyky-
nurenic acid amides 30a–g there were relatively slight
variations in the potency. It seemed that substituents
on the benzyl group or the replacement of the CH2 of
these benzyl groups for O did not affect the activity of
the compounds. The only exception was 30e which
showed about 5-fold weaker potency compared to its
congeners. In order to improve metabolic stability the
H-bond donor OH was substituted for an NH on the
left-hand side of the molecule. The acetamido analogue
31 lost its activity, while its heterotricyclic analogue 32,
bearing the NH at the same position, had slightly lower
potency compared to 6-hydroxy derivatives.
Biological activity of the prepared compounds was mea-
sured in a functional assay where the inhibition of
NMDA-evoked increase of intracellular Ca2+ level was
determined in rat cortical cell culture. Baseline and
NMDA-evoked changes of intracellular Ca2+ were mon-
itored with fluorimetry using a Ca2+-selective fluorescent
dye (Fluo-4/AM) and a plate reader fluorimeter.12 Selec-
tivity towards NR2A subunit containing NMDA recep-
tors was tested by the same functional assay using cells
expressing recombinant NR1/NR2A receptors. The re-
sults of these assays for selected compounds are summa-
rized in Table 1. Although functional data were sufficient
for lead optimisation the most active compound 30g was
also investigated in a binding assay on rat forebrain
membrane using tritiated Ro-25,6981 as radioligand.13–15
In vivo analgesic activity was tested in the mouse
formalin test,16,17 a model of persistent pain.
Compared to the indole-2-carboxamides (2 and 3), the
corresponding benzimidazole-2-carboxamide 4 had sig-
nificantly higher activity. Analogously the addition of
a further N to the kynurenic acid skeleton resulted in
the quinazoline 38. The activity of this compound, how-
ever, was much lower than that of the parent compound.
In this case increasing the number of heteroatoms in the
central ring-system decreased the potency.
All the kynurenic acid amides were found to be inactive
on the NR2A subtype of the NMDA receptors.
In the Ro-25,6981 binding assay compound 30g was
active, it showed high affinity (Ki: 4.2 nM (n = 3))
towards the ifenprodil binding site.
Similarly to many known NR2B antagonists the pres-
ence of an OH group, as a H-bond donor moiety, on
the quinolinone ring-system was a prerequisite of high
potency. The position of this OH, however, significantly
influenced the activity of the compounds. In contrast to
Compounds 30a–g and 32 were tested in the mouse for-
malin test as well (Table 1). Several members of this series
(30b, 30d, 30e and 30g) showed good oral activity, howev-
er others with similarly good in vitro potency (30a, 30c,