Scheme 3. Ti-Mediated Cyclopropanation of Nitriles
Scheme 4. Proposed Paths for the Lewis Acid Activation of C
Kulinkovich conditions the ketone was the major product
of hydrolysis, the addition of BF3‚OEt2 to the metallacycle
modified dramatically the outcome of the reaction, affording
cyclopropylamines in good yields. The Lewis acid was
assumed to induce the ring contraction of the five-membered
metallacycle in this case.
of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 and 1a in THF led to the N-acyl hemiaminal
2a in 89% yield (Table 1, entry 1).
The formation of cyclopropane derivatives would similarly
be expected through a Lewis acid activation of C (Scheme
4). In this case, two products can be anticipated, depending
on the selectivity of the Lewis acid addition. Following path
a, the coordination of a Lewis acid on the carbonyl moiety
would induce the formation of the homoenolate equivalent
E, in the way analogous to that encountered in the Kulink-
ovich cyclopropanation of esters, to produce the amide-
substituted cyclopropanol 3.9 In path b, coordination of the
Lewis acid on the oxygen linked to titanium would produce
the azaspirocyclic compound 4 through the iminium inter-
mediate G.10
Table 1. Ti-Mediated Addition of EtMgBr to Imide 1a
yield (%)a
entry
[Ti] (equiv)
n
1a
2a
4a
5a
1b
2
Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (1.2)
Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (1.2)
Ti(Oi-Pr)4 (1.2)
ClTi(Oi-Pr)3 (1.2)
MeTi(Oi-Pr)3 (1.2) 1.2 49
MeTi(Oi-Pr)3 (1.5) 1.5
MeTi(Oi-Pr)3 (1.5) 1.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
-
-
-
-
89 (75)
-
49
50
62
38
79 (75)
78 (74)
-
34
39
21
2
Initial experiments were carried out with N-benzylsuccin-
imide (1a). As expected, the addition of EtMgBr to a solution
-
-
-
-
-
-
3c
4
(2) Reviews: (a) Kulinkovich, O. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 4517-
4529. (b) de Meijere, A.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; Savchenko, A. I. In Titanium
and Zirconium in Organic Synthesis; Marek, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Wein-
heim, Germany, 2002; pp 390-434. (c) de Meijere, A.; Kulinkovich, O.
G. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2789-2834.
(3) Review: de Meijere, A.; Kozhushkov, S. I.; Savchenko, A. I. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 2033-2055.
(4) Lee, J.; Kim, Y. G.; Bae, J. G.; Cha, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
4878-4879.
5
6
7d
-
-
2
3
a NMR yields; isolated yields in parentheses. bReaction performed without
c
d
the addition of BF3‚OEt2. Reaction carried out in Et2O. Me3SiOTf used
instead of BF3‚OEt2.
(5) (a) Lee, J.; Ha, J. D.; Cha, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8127-
8128. (b) Lee, K.; Kim, S.-E.; Cha, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9135-
9138. (c) Sung, M. J.; Lee, C.-W.; Cha, J. K. Synlett 1999, 561-562. (d)
Kim, S.-H.; Park, Y.; Choo, H.; Cha, J. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
6657-6660. (e) Santra, S.; Masalov, N.; Epstein, O.; Cha, J. K. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 5901-5904.
A successive addition of BF3‚OEt2 to the reaction mixture
led to the formation of two new products, the enamide 5a,
resulting probably from the dehydration of 2a, and the
azaspirocyclic compound 4a as the sole cyclopropane-
containing derivative (entry 2). Whereas the use of ClTi-
(Oi-Pr)3 instead of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 had a moderate effect on the
4a/5a ratio (entry 4), the use of MeTi(Oi-Pr3)11 was found
to significantly increase the ratio of the cyclopropane 4a to
the detriment of 5a (entries 5-7). In fact, MeTi(Oi-Pr3)
requires only one equivalent of EtMgBr to form the titana-
cyclopropane, thus limiting side reactions resulting from the
(6) Similarly to imides, N-acylpyrroles did not afford cyclopropane
derivatives under Kulinkovich conditions; see: Epstein, O. L.; Seo, J. M.;
Masalov, N.; Cha, J. K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2105-2108.
(7) (a) Kim, S.-H.; Kim, S.-I.; Lai, S.; Cha, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 6771-6775. (b) Kim, S.-H.; Cha, J. K. Synthesis 2000, 2113-2116.
(c) Ollero, L.; Mentink, G.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Speckamp, W. N.; Hiemstra,
H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1331-1334.
(8) (a) Bertus, P.; Szymoniak, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1792-1793.
(b) Bertus, P.; Szymoniak, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3965-3968. (c)
Bertus, P.; Szymoniak, J. Synlett 2003, 265-267. (d) Laroche, C.; Bertus,
P.; Szymoniak, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2485-2487. (e) Bertus, P.;
Szymoniak, J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7133-7136. (f) Laroche, C.; Harakat,
D.; Bertus, P.; Szymoniak, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3482-3487.
(g) Laroche, C.; Behr, J.-B.; Szymoniak, J.; Bertus, P.; Plantier-Royon, R.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 5084-5088. See also: (h) Gensini, M.;
Kozhushkov, S. I.; Yufit, D. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Es-Sayed, M.; de Meijere,
A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2499-2507.
(10) (a) According to the referee’s remark, 4 could also arise from the
Lewis acid coordination on the alkoxy ligands. (b) Another site of
coordination is the nitrogen atom. The expected final product would be the
same as that in path a, i. e., the cyclopropanol 3.
(11) MeTi(Oi-Pr)3 was prepared from ClTi(Oi-Pr)3 and MeLi; see: Reetz,
M. T.; Westermann, J.; Steinbach, R.; Wenderoth, B.; Peter, R.; Ostarek,
R.; Maus, S. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 1421-1440.
(9) Closely related to imides, acyloxazolidinones afforded cyclopropanols
under Kulinkovich conditions; see: Mizojiri, R.; Urabe, H.; Sato, F. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 6217-6222.
660
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 4, 2007