EWidence for Strong Tantalum-to-Boron DatiWe Interactions
counterflow. BH3·THF (0.28 mL, 1 M in THF, 0.28 mmol) was
added via syringe to the ether solution at -78 °C. The flask was
allowed to warm to 23 °C, and stirring was maintained for 1.5 h.
The volatiles were removed, and the volume of the solution was
reduced to 10 mL. Filtration was followed by further concentration
to 3 mL, and cooling to -78 °C generated a white crystalline solid
8. 5 + D2. A sample of 5 was placed into an NMR tube attached
to a 14/20 joint. The tube was fixed to a 180° needle valve and
evacuated. C6D6 (0.6 mL) was added via vacuum-transfer. The tube
was filled with ∼600 Torr of D2 and sealed with a torch. After
thermolysis at 90 °C for 18 h, the 1H{11B} NMR spectrum showed
the presence of 2, 2-D, and 2-D2.
1
that was isolated by filtration (0.186 g, 77%). H NMR (C6D6) δ
Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination. 9. 3. An orange
crystal approximately 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 mm3 obtained from a toluene/
hexane solution was mounted in a capillary and placed in the
goniometer of a Siemens P4 diffractometer equipped with a fine-
focus molybdenum X-ray tube and graphite monochromator at 293-
(2) K. Preliminary diffraction data revealed a triclinic cell, a
hemisphere routine was used to collect the data, and precise lattice
constants (a ) 13.1510(1) Å, b ) 13.1990(10) Å, and c ) 17.441-
(2) Å; a ) 102.020(10)°, b ) 96.160(10)°, g ) 119.120(10)°; V )
2508.5(4) Å3) were determined from a least-squares fit of 15
measured 2θ values. The space group (P1h) was determined, and
after correction for Lorentz, polarization, and background effects,
unique data were judged observed according to |Fo| > 2σ|Fo| (6444
out of 7476; 464 parameters). All heavy atoms were located using
direct methods, and all non-hydrogen atoms were revealed by
successive Fourier syntheses. Full matrix, least-squares refinements
(minimization of ∑w(Fo - Fc)2 where w is based on counting
statistics modified by an ignorance factor, w-1) with anisotropic
heavy atoms and all hydrogens included at calculated positions led
to the final model. Refinement utilized SHELXL and w-1 ) σ2-
t
1.29 (s, Bu, 81H), 3.48 (br quar, BH4,1JBH ) 88 Hz, 4H), 22.47
(br quin, TaH,2JHH ) 12 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (C6D6) δ 24.25
(SiC), 30.47 (C(CH3)3). 11B NMR (C6D6) δ -16.72 (quin,1JBH
)
88 Hz). IR (nujol, cm-1) 2495 (m), 2200 (br, m), 2150 (br, m),
1765 (br, s), 1470 (s), 1375 (m), 1160 (br, w), 1010 (w), 960 (w),
925 (w), 870 (br, s), 810 (s), 620 (s). Anal. Calcd for C36H86BO3-
Si3Ta: C, 51.29; H, 10.28. Found: C, 51.57; H, 10.50.
b. (silox)3DTa(η3-BD4) (5-D5). Into a 10 mL flask was placed 1
(0.102 g, 0.123 mmol). The flask was attached to a gas bulb,
evacuated, and cooled to -78 °C. THF (5 mL) was added followed
by 600 Torr of D2. The solution was stirred for 1 h at 23 °C and
freeze/pump/thaw degassed. The reaction was recharged with D2
and stirred for another 1.5 h. After the solution was degassed, B2D6
(13.5 Torr in 91 mL, 0.067 mmol, 0.54 equiv) was condensed into
the flask. The solution was stirred for 3 h, and the volatiles were
removed. The white solid obtained after addition and removal
of 2 × 5 mL hexane was found to be >95% pure and ∼60%
deuterated (Ta-H and BH4 sites), which was sufficient for the IR
study. IR (nujol, cm-1, B-D and Ta-D vibrations) 1870, 1630,
1580, 1270 (TaD).
(Fo ) + (0.0595p)2 + 7.1714p, where p ) (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3). R1 [I >
2
2σ(I)] ) ∑||Fo| - |Fc||/∑|Fo| ) 0.0433, R1 (all data) ) 0.0560;
NMR Tube Reactions. 4. 2 + C2H4. An NMR tube attached to
a ground glass joint was charged with 2 (0.018 g, 0.021 mmol)
and attached to a gas bulb. C6D6 (0.6 mL) was added at 77 K
followed by C2H4 (57.4 Torr in 20.5 mL, 0.064 mmol, 3 equiv).
The tube was sealed with a torch under dynamic vacuum. No change
2 1/2
wR2 [I > 2σ(I)] ) [∑w(|Fo| - |Fc|)2/∑wFo ] ) 0.1047, wR2
(all data) ) 0.1174; GOF (all data, n ) number of independent
reflections, p ) number of parameters) ) [∑w(|Fo| - |Fc|)2/(n -
p)]1/2 ) 1.040.
1
Computational Methods. All calculations were carried out using
the Gaussian0343 suite of programs. The B3LYP functional (Becke’s
three-parameter hybrid functional44 using the LYP correlation
functional containing both local and nonlocal terms of Lee, Yang,
and Parr)45 and VWN (Slater local exchange functional43 plus the
local correlation functional of Vosko, Wilk, and Nusair)46 was
employed in conjunction with the CEP-31G(d) valence basis sets
and effective core potentials of Stevens et al.47 Closed-shell
(diamagnetic) and open-shell (paramagnetic) species were modeled
within the restricted and unrestricted Kohn-Sham formalisms,48
respectively. All systems were fully optimized without symmetry
constraint.
was noted in the H NMR spectrum of the sample after weeks at
room temperature and 20 h at 90 °C.
5. 2 + Me3N. An NMR tube on a 14/20 joint was charged with
a sample of 2 (0.010 g, 0.012 mmol). The tube was attached to a
gas bulb and evacuated. Benzene-d6 (0.6 mL) and Me3N (188 Torr
in 12.3 mL, 0.126 mmol, 10.5 equiv) were added at 77 K. The
tube was flame-sealed under dynamic vacuum. After a week at room
temperature, the NMR spectrum showed only 2 and Me3N.
6. 5 + Me3N. A 25 mL flask containing an ether solution of 4
(0.052 g, 0.063 mmol) was treated with BH3·THF (0.063 mL, 1 M
in THF, 0.063 mmol) and stirred for 18 h. The volatiles were
removed, and the NMR spectrum of the resulting solid showed only
5. The solid was transferred into an NMR tube on a ground glass
joint with 0.7 mL of C6D6. The tube was attached to a gas bulb
and freeze/pump/thaw degassed three times. Me3N (55.2 Torr in
20.5 mL, 0.062 mmol) was condensed into the tube, which was
(43) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin,
K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G.
A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.;
Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai,
H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.;
Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R.
E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J.
W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.;
Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.;
Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari,
K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.;
Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.;
Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian 03, revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
(44) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372-1377.
1
sealed with a torch. The H NMR spectrum taken immediately
upon warming showed a 1:1 mixture of 4 and 5. Within 3 h, the
NMR showed no 5 and complete formation of the products, 4 and
Me3N·BH3.
7. 2 + BH3·THF. To an NMR tube attached to a ground glass
joint was added a sample of 2 (0.012 g, 0.014 mmol). The tube
was attached to a 180° needle valve and freeze/pump/thaw degassed.
THF-d8 (0.6 mL) was added via vacuum-transfer. Against a
counterflow of N2, BH3·THF (14 µL, 1 M in THF, 0.014 mmol)
was added to the tube. After degassing, the tube was frozen at 77
K and flame-sealed under dynamic vacuum. The room-temperature
11B NMR spectrum of this sample showed a sharp quartet at δ
30.5 for 2 and a broad signal at δ -0.1 corresponding to BH3·
THF, neither of which showed any sign of coalescing or broadening
up to 80 °C.
(45) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. 1998, B37, 785.
(46) Vosko, S. H. W., L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58, 1200.
(47) (a) Stevens, W. J.; Basch, H.; Krauss, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81,
6026-6033. (b) Stevens, W. J.; Basch, H.; Krauss, M.; Jasien, P. G.
Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 612-630.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2007 1231