284
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had a
pericardial window under ketamine anesthesia where
this was taken into consideration.
voltage and her chest x-ray suggested a large pericar-
dial effusion.
The patient eventually consented to needle
drainage of the pericardial effusion prior to definitive
surgery providing she was not aware. An echocardio-
gram demonstrated a very large anterior and posterior
pericardial effusion and a chronically dilated right ven-
tricle with systolic and diastolic collapse. Under echo
guidance, in the intensive care unit (ICU) in the sit-
ting position, 400 mL of chocolate coloured pericar-
dial fluid was drained. Three boluses of midazolam 0.5
mg and propofol 20 mg iv were given during the pro-
cedure. Hemodynamics remained stable throughout
the procedure and at the termination, right ventricu-
lar collapse was still present on echocardiogram. In the
operating room with continuous intra-arterial moni-
toring, automated segment lead I, II, and V analysis,
nasal O 4 L·min–1, the patient was prepped and
draped i2n the sitting position. After administration of
glycopyrrolate 0.3 mg, and midazolam 1 mg, anesthe-
sia was induced with ketamine in 25 mg increments to
a total of 100 mg. Blood pressure was 120 mmHg sys-
tolic, and heart rate 100 beats·min–1. The patient was
gradually returned to the supine position and lido-
caine 1% was infiltrated locally. Subxiphoid drainage of
1000 mL of effusion increased her blood pressure to
140 mmHg systolic. Heart rate was 100–115
beats·min– 1 and SpO2 >93% throughout. An intraop-
erative blood gas postdrainage showed a pH 7.28,
PO2 102 mmHg, pCO 96 mmHg, HCO3 44
mmoL·L– 1. A total of 4502mg of ketamine were used
during the procedure. The xiphisternum and a large
ellipse of anterior pericardium were excised along with
talc poudrage of the pericardial space. She returned to
the ICU with stable hemodyamics and had no recall of
events. There were no postoperative problems except
for a pneumothorax, which required insertion of a
left-sided chest tube, probably due to the pericardio-
centesis. She was discharged home five days postoper-
atively and analysis of the pericardial fluid was negative
for malignancy, showing only inflammatory cells.
Case report
A 73-yr-old, 72-kg woman with long-standing COPD
and cor pulmonale was admitted with pericardial effu-
sion and tamponade. Admission one month prior for
drainage of a pericardial effusion was complicated by
insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter introducer
into the carotid artery and postpericardiocentesis
intrapericardial hemorrhage. Her pulmonary artery
pressure at that time was 54/25 mmHg. She was dis-
charged home on nasal O 4 L·min– 1. Prior to the pre-
sent admission she expe2rienced increasing dyspnea,
orthopnea and peripheral edema. Other medical prob-
lems were obesity, stable angina, and hypothyroidism.
Medications included enalapril, furosemide, isosor-
bide dinitrate, ranitidine, thyroxin, salbutamol and
ipratropium bromide. She reported allergies to peni-
cillin, codeine and morphine. Blood pressure on
admission was 130/80 mmHg, heart rate 90
beats·min– 1, respiratory rate 24 breaths·min–1 and a
pulsus paradoxus of 10 mmHg. Breath sounds were
decreased bilaterally with bibasilar crackles. Her SpO
2
was 98% on nasal O 4 L·min– 1, and jugular venous
pressure (JVP) was 32cm H2O.
The following day she was in distress with increas-
ing shortness of breath. She was unable to lie down
stating she had never been this bad before. There had
been no improvement with salbutamol inhalation and
she had been started on prednisone. Her blood pres-
sure was 116/68 mmHg, heart rate 110 beats·min–1,
pulsus paradoxus 26 mmHg and SpO 93% on nasal
O2 4 L·min–1. Examination revealed2 decreased air
entry with faint wheezes, JVP 8 cm H O, with poorly
palpable peripheral pulses. The patient2refused to have
another pericardiocentesis “awake” because of her
previous experience and requested surgical drainage
be performed under a general anesthetic.
Initially a thoracoscopic pericardial window was
considered but in consultation with the attending
anesthesiologist it was decided that problems with col-
lapsing the emphysematous lung, difficulty in tolerat-
ing one lung anesthesia, and lack of an expeditious
resolution made a subxiphoid approach to the pericar-
dial window preferable. Anemia was corrected with
two units of packed cells bringing the hemoglobin
concentration to 106 mg·dL–1. Electrolytes and liver
function tests were normal, an arterial blood gas on 4
L·min–1 nasal O2 showed pH 7.38, PO2 78.9 mmHg,
PCO2 71.8 mmHg, HCO3 37.5 mmoL·L– 1. Her elec-
trocardiogram showed a sinus tachycardia with low
Discussion
Pericardial tamponade is primarily a problem of
impaired diastolic filling due to continuous elevation
of intrapericardial pressure decreasing stroke volume,
cardiac output and systemic blood pressure.1 The
choice of anesthetic in this patient had to take into
account the combined pathophysiology of pericardial
tamponade and chronic obstructive lung disease with
CO2 retention. Hypercarbia may increase right ven-
tricular afterload, and cause dysrhythmias which could
be detrimental to the failing right ventricle.2 While the