M. Kimura et al.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 80, No. 2 (2007)
421
Attempts to Polymerize 9,9-Diallylfluorene. A solution of
9,9-diallylfluorene18 (1.23 g, 5.0 mmol), AIBN (86 mg, 0.5 mmol)
in benzene (10 mL) was heated at reflux for 3 h. The insoluble sol-
id, which was also insoluble in chloroform, was filtered and dried
(5 mg). Analysis of the filtrate showed that the most (>90%) of
the starting material remained unchanged. Similar attempts with
9,9-diallyl-2,7-bis(diphenylamino)fluorene, prepared similarly as
described below, in benzene or o-dichlorobenzene resulted in
recovery of the starting material.
9,9-Bis(2-methylallyl)fluorene was prepared by the alkylation
described below in 91%. However, this substance is a colorless
solid, mp 64–66 ꢁC, and not a liquid as reported.19 A solution of
bis(2-methylallyl)fluorene (0.683 g, 2.5 mmol) and p-toluenesul-
fonic acid monohydrate (TsOH, 95 mg, 0.5 mmol) in benzene
(2 mL) was heated at reflux for 2 h. Precipitation with methanol
gave a yellowish solid (0.12 g).
10000
1000
100
10
1
Oligomer3
Oligomer6
0.1
0
5
10
15
Preparation of 2,7-Bis(diphenylamino)fluorene (1). A solu-
tion of 2,7-dibromofluorene (16.2 g, 50 mmol), diphenylamine
(18.6 g, 110 mmol), and sodium t-butoxide (11.5 g, 120 mmol) in
o-xylene (100 mL), to which a prepared solution of palladium(II)
acetate (0.33 mmol) and tri-t-butylphosphine20 in o-xylene was
added as the catalyst, was refluxed at about 120 ꢁC under nitrogen
atmosphere for 6 h. After cooling, extraction with chloroform and
the usual work-up gave a crude material. Recrystallization from
benzene–ethanol (4:1) gave brownish powder of 1 (17.9 g, 71%
yield): mp 233–235 ꢁC; 1H NMR: ꢄ 3.75 (s, 2H), 7.68–7.49 (m,
26H).
2,7-Bis(diphenylamino)-9,9-bis(2-methylallyl)fluorene (2).
Sodium hydride (NaH 60% in oil, 0.96 g, 24 mmol) was washed
repeatedly with hexane. A mixture of NaH, 1 (5.01 g, 10 mmol),
and 2-methylallyl chloride (2.5 mL, 25 mmol) in DMF (30 mL)
was stirred at room temperature (rt) for 6 h. Work-up, including
extraction with benzene and purification by recrystallization
from benzene–ethanol (4:1), afforded a faint purple colored solid
(4.38 g, 72%). Repeated recrystallization gave an analytical sam-
ple of 2: mp 215–217 ꢁC; APCI-MS m=z 609 (M þ 1); 1H NMR: ꢄ
1.10 (s, 6H), 2.63 (s, 4H), 4.28 (s, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 7.0–7.5 (m,
26H); Anal. Found: C, 88.72; H, 6.85; N, 4.43%. Calcd for
C45H40N2: C, 88.78; H, 6.62; N, 4.60%.
Applied voltage/V
Fig. 2. Luminance–applied voltage characteristics for oli-
gomer 3 ( ) and 6 ( ). The device structure is shown
in the footnote c) in Table 1.
was better than 3 because of its lower L300 of 9.5 V and its
higher Lmax of 6300 cd mꢂ2 (see Table 1). This statement is
further supported by efficiencies; oligomer 6 had a luminous
power efficiency ꢂe of 0.78 lm Wꢂ1 and a current efficiency
ꢂc of 2.3 cd Aꢂ1. Both values for 6 are larger than those for
3. Based on the large differences, it should be possible to im-
prove these values by fine tuning the structure via substituents,
molecular weights, terminal groups, and device structures. The
difference between 3 and 6 in EL performance may be under-
stood in terms of the higher content of electroconductive aro-
matic rings in 6; it seems necessary to elucidate not only chem-
ical aspects, such as ꢃ-electron interaction,27 in the solid state
but also physical aspects of the surface phenomena, including
band bending.28
To summarize the present approach to polymers, it is con-
cluded that oligomers like 6 are advantageous due to their high
Tg (167 ꢁC) for the purpose of long-life driving in devices as
well as facile processing of thin-film devices, though the de-
vice performance must be improved. For the molecular design
of thermally stable HTMs, it is noted that oligomers with a low
number22 of the degree of polymerization can bring about
Tg’s > 100 ꢁC for practical use.
Polymerization of 2. A solution of 2 (1.83 g, 3 mmol) and
TsOH (57 mg, 0.3 mmol) in o-dichlorobenzene (10 mL) was heat-
ed at 130 ꢁC for 1 day. The reaction mixture was poured into
methanol (50 mL). The resulting solid was filtered and dissolved
in THF. Reprecipitation with methanol gave a greenish solid of
1
3 (1.79 g): H NMR: ꢄ 1.15–1.30 (br s, 6H), 1.61 (br s, 4H), 2.13
(br s, 2H), 2.33 (br s, 2H), 7.0–7.4 (m, 26H); Anal. Found: C,
89.51; H, 6.17; N, 4.32%. Calcd for (C45H40N2)n: C, 88.78; H,
6.62; N, 4.60%.
Experimental
General. Commercially available reagents including dry sol-
vents were used as received. NMR spectra were recorded on a
200 or 500 MHz spectrometer in CDCl3 using TMS as an internal
standard. GPC analysis using polystyrene standards was carried out
with a dilute solution of the oligomers in THF solvent. DSC analy-
ses were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer DSC 7000 model under ni-
trogen; samples were heated to over 300 ꢁC, cooled rapidly to room
temperature and heated again with heating rate of 10 ꢁC minꢂ1 for
record. CV measurements were carried out on a BAS-50W electro-
chemical analyzer with dichloromethane solutions (10 mL, 0.01 M)
containing tetrabutylammonium perchlorate (0.1 M) under nitro-
Preparation of 9,9-Di-p-bromobenzyl-2,7-bis(diphenyl-
amino)fluorene (4). The alkylation described in 2 was carried
out with p-bromobenzyl bromide (6.25 g, 25 mmol) on 1 (5.01 g,
10 mmol). Purification by recrystallization from benzene–ethanol
(5:1) gave a pinkish white solid of 4: mp 210–212 ꢁC; APCI-
MS m=z 837 (M ꢂ 1, 50%), 839 (M þ 1, 100), 841 (M þ 3, 50);
1H NMR ꢄ 3.15 (s, 4H), 6.50 (d-like, 4H), 7.0–7.55 (m, 30H);
Anal. Found: C, 72.88; H, 4.62; N, 3.27%. Calcd for C51H38-
Br2N2: C, 73.03; H, 4.57; N, 3.34%.
Conversion of 4 into the Corresponding Borate 5. To a so-
lution of dibromide 4 (2.10 g, 2.5 mmol) in THF cooled at ꢂ70 ꢁC,
butyllithium (in hexane 1.6 M, 3.8 mL, 6.1 mmol) was added drop-
wise for 10 min. After the resulting slurry was stirred for 1 h, tri-
methyl borate (0.84 mL, 7.5 mmol) was added, and the mixture
gen atmosphere, and were recorded at a scan rate of 0.2 V sꢂ1
.
The voltammogram in Fig. 1 was plotted after calibration using
ferrocene and recording the oxidation potential, an average of peak
oxidation and reduction potentials vs Ag/AgCl electrode.