W. Ding et al. / Phytochemistry 81 (2012) 165–174
173
silica gel CC eluted with cyclohexane–EtOAc (95:5) to give 16-(S,R)
(5.5 mg, 71%). Similarly, treatment of 9-(S) (5.0 mg) with (S)-MPA
yielded 16-(S,S) (6.0 mg, 78%). Using the same method, esterifica-
tion of 10-(S) and 11-(S) with (R)-MPA and (S)-MPA gave two pairs
of Mosher’s esters 17-(S,R)/17-(S,R) and 18-(S,R)/18-(S,S),
respectively.
4.14. Alkaline hydrolysis of 4 and 5 and analysis of short organic acids
Compound 4 (5 mg) was treated with 5% KOH (3 mL) at 85 °C
for 4 h. The reaction mixture was acidified to pH 4.0 and extracted
with Et2O (3 ꢁ 1 mL). The Et2O layer was dried (anhydr. MgSO4)
and concentrated to a small volume (about 0.2 mL) to afford a short
chain organic acid fraction. The aqueous layer was further ex-
tracted with n-BuOH (3 ꢁ 2 mL). The n-BuOH solution was concen-
trated in vacuo to yield a glycosidic acid (3 mg) which was
identified as turpethic acid A (1) on the basis of the 1H NMR spec-
troscopic data and HPLC analysis. By the same method, compound
5 (5 mg) afforded another short chain organic acid fraction and tur-
pethic acid B (3 mg, 2).
4.13.1. (S)-12-[(R)-a-Methoxy-a-phenylacetyloxy]pentadecanoic acid
methyl ester [16-(S,R)]
20
Colorless oil, [a]
D
–3.5 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.33 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.91 (m, H-12),
4.74 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s, MPA-a-
a
OCH3), 2.30 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.62 (2H, m, H-3), 1.50 (2H,
m, H-11), 1.38 (2H, m, H-13), 1.22 (2H, m, H-10), 0.99 (2H, m, H-
14), 0.71 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-15); ESIMS m/z: 421 [M+H]+, 443 [M+Na]+.
Both short chain organic acid fractions obtained from 4 and 5
were analyzed by GC–MS using a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2000Plus
apparatus, equipped with a RxiÒ-5 ms fused silica capillary column
(30 m ꢁ 0.25 mm, 0.25
lm). The carrier gas was helium. Column
4.13.2. (S)-12-[(S)-
a
-Methoxy-
a
-phenylacetyloxy]pentadecanoic acid
temperature was initially 50 °C, increased to 160 °C at 20 °C/min,
then increased to 220 °C at 5 °C/min. For GC–MS detection, an elec-
tron ionization system was used with ionization energy of 70 eV.
Both fractions gave two predominant peaks which were identified
to be 2-methylbutyric acid (tR 3.14 min): EIMS m/z 102 [M]+ (0.8),
87 (24), 74 (100), 57 (64), 45 (16), and 41 (52), and tiglic acid (tR
3.70 min): EIMS m/z 100 [M]+ (100), 85 (29), 72 (0.8), 55 (86), 53
(16), and 39 (25), by comparison of their retention times (tR) with
those of authentic ( )-2-methylbutyric acid and tiglic acid (both
98%, Acros Organics, New Jersey).
methyl ester [16-(S,S)]
20
Colorless oil, [a]
D
+4.0 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.33 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.92 (1H, m, H-
12), 4.73 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s,
MPA- -OCH3), 2.31 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-2), 1.61 (2H, m, H-3), 1.49
a
a
(2H, m, H-13), 1.38 (2H, m, H-11), 1.27 (2H, m, H-14), 0.90 (2H,
m, H-10), 0.88 (3H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-15); ESIMS m/z: 421 [M+H]+,
443 [M+Na]+.
4.13.3. (S)-12-[(R)-a-Methoxy-
a-phenylacetyloxy]hexadecanoic acid
Subsequently, 2-methylbutyric acid in fractions obtained from
4 and 5 was further analyzed by GC with an Agilent 7890A GC sys-
methyl ester [17-(S,R)]
Colorless oil, [a]
D
–3.6 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
20
tem using a Chir-
siloxane) chiral capillary column (Varian WCOT Fused Silica
CP7495, 25 m ꢁ 0.25 mm, 0.12 m), column temp.: 50 °C (hold
L-Val (N-propionyl-L-valine tert-butylamide poly-
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.33 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.90 (1H, m, H-
12), 4.73 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s,
MPA- -OCH3), 2.30 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.61 (2H, m, H-3), 1.50
a
l
a
2 min)?180 °C at 3 °C/min, carrier gas H2. The authentic sample
( )-2-methylbutyric acid gave two peaks at tR 17.05 min and tR
17.19 min. Each of the fractions from 4 and 5 and the authentic
(S)-(+)-2-methylbutyric acid (98%, Acros Organics, New Jersey)
gave a single peak at tR ꢂ17 min, and a mixture sample containing
two fractions and authentic (S)-(+)-2-methylbutyric acid provided
only one peak at tR 17.22 min. Thus, the absolute configuration of
2-methylbutyric acid in both fractions from 4 and 5 was deter-
mined to be S.
(2H, m, H-11), 1.38 (2H, m, H-13), 1.22 (2H, m, H-10), 1.07 (2H,
m, H-15), 0.90 (2H, m, H-14), 0.70 (3H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-16); ESIMS
m/z: 435 [M+H]+, 457 [M+Na]+.
4.13.4. (S)-12-[(S)-
a
-Methoxy-
a
-phenylacetyloxy]hexadecanoic acid
methyl ester [17-(S,S)]
Colorless oil, [a]
D
+3.6 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
20
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.33 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.90 (1H, m, H-
12), 4.74 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s,
MPA- -OCH3), 2.31 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.62 (2H, m, H-3), 1.51
a
a
Acknowledgments
(2H, m, H-13), 1.37 (2H, m, H-11), 1.29 (2H, m, H-14), 1.25 (2H,
m, H-15), 0.90 (2H, m, H-10), 0.86 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-16); ESIMS
m/z: 435 [M+H]+, 457 [M+Na]+.
We thank Mr. Ming Zhu, Zhuhai Action Pharmaceutical Science
and Technology Co. Ltd., Zhuhai, Guangdong, China, for the collec-
tion of plant material and Prof. Fuwu Xing, South China Botanical
Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences for the authentication of
plant material. The author, Dr. Jiang, gratefully acknowledges the
support of K.C. Wong Education Foundation. This work was sup-
ported by the Knowledge Innovation Programs of the Chinese
Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. KSCX2-EW-R-15 and KSCX2-
YW-R-218).
4.13.5. (S)-12-[(R)-a-Methoxy-
a-phenylacetyloxy]heptadecanoic acid
methyl ester [18-(S,R)]
Colorless oil, [a]
D
–3.6 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
20
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.34 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.90 (1H, m, H-
12), 4.73 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s,
MPA- -OCH3), 2.30 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.62 (2H, m, H-3), 1.50
a
a
(2H, m, H-11), 1.38 (2H, m, H-13), 1.22 (2H, m, H-10), 1.10 (2H,
m, H-16), 1.05 (2H, m, H-15), 0.93 (2H, m, H-14), 0.77 (3H, t,
J = 6.9 Hz, H-17); ESIMS m/z: 449 [M+H]+, 471 [M+Na]+.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
4.13.6. (S)-12-[(S)-
methyl ester [18-(S,S)]
a
-Methoxy-
a
-phenylacetyloxy]heptadecanoic acid
+3.9 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz,
20
Colorless oil, [a]
D
CDCl3) d: 7.44 (2H, m, Ar-H), 7.33 (3H, m, Ar-H), 4.90 (1H, m, H-
12), 4.73 (1H, s, MPA-H- ), 3.67 (3H, s, 1-OCH3), 3.42 (3H, s,
MPA- -OCH3), 2.31 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 1.62 (2H, m, H-3), 1.50
(2H, m, H-13), 1.38 (2H, m, H-11), 1.29 (2H, m, H-15), 1.25 (2H,
m, H-16), 1.23 (2H, m, H-14), 0.90 (2H, m, H-10), 0.86 (3H, t,
J = 6.8 Hz, H-17); ESIMS m/z: 449 [M+H]+, 471 [M+Na]+.
a
References
a
Ahbuselvam, C., Vijayavel, K., Balasubramanian, M.P., 2007. Protective effect of
Operculina turpethum against 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene induced
oxidative stress with reference to breast cancer in experimental rats. Chem.
Biol. Interact. 168, 229–236.