S. Latreche et al. / Polyhedron 29 (2010) 1399–1404
1403
J = 6 Hz, 1H, –CHMe2), 1.07 (d, J = 6 Hz, 6H, –CHMe2). 13C NMR
4.5. {Pr(o-C6H4F)2TAC}CrCl3 (5)
(CDCl3, 75 MHz): d 155.6 (d, J = 245 Hz, 2C, CArF), 137.5 (d, J = 9
Hz, 2C, CArN), 124.4 (d, J = 4 Hz, 2C, Ar), 122.7 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2C, Ar),
120.6 (d, J = 3 Hz, 2C, Ar), 115.8 (d, J = 21 Hz, 2C, Ar), 69.9 (t,
J = 4 Hz, 1C, –N(Ar)CH2N(Ar)–), 68.4 (d, J = 3 Hz, 2C, –N(Pr)CH2-
N(Ar)–), 49.0 (s, 1C, –CHMe2), 20.4 (s, 2C, –CHMe2). 19F NMR
(CDCl3, 282 MHz): d ꢀ125.1 (m).
TAC 1 (41 mg, 0.11 mmol) and CrCl3(THF)3 (35 mg, 0.11 mmol)
were stirred in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) for 20 h. Filtration, repeated wash-
ings with ether and drying in vacuo resulted in 3.0 mg (57%) of a
purple solid. Anal. Calc. for C18H21N3F2CrCl3: C, 45.44; H, 4.45; N,
8.83. Found: C, 45.04; H, 4.3; N, 8.91.
4.3. 1-Pr-3,5-bis(p-C6H4)F-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (3)
4.6. {iso-Pr(o-C6H4F)2TAC}CrCl3 (6)
n-Propylamine (7.9 mL, 96 mmol) and p-fluoroaniline (4.54 mL,
48 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (20 mL). An aqueous solution
of formaldehyde in water (37%, 10.8 mL, 144 mmol) was added un-
der stirring. The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature
for 1 days. The resulting precipitate was filtered and dried to yield
the required product. 4.0 g (52%). Anal. Calc. for C18H21N3F2: C,
68.12; H, 6.67; N, 13.24. Found: C, 67.87; H, 6.56; N, 13.06%. 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d 6.90–6.84 (m, 8H, Ph), 4.63 (s, 2H,
–N(Ar)CH2N(Ar)–), 4.18 (s, 4H, –N(Pr)CH2N(Ar)–), 2.50 (t, J = 7 Hz,
2H, NCH2Et), 1.47 (sex., J = 7 Hz, 2H, NCH2CH2Me), 0.86 (t,
J = 7 Hz, 3H, NCH2CH2Me). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHZ): d 157.6 (d,
J = 240 Hz, 2C, CArF), 145.8 (s, 2C, CArN), 119.5 (d, J = 8 Hz, 4C, Ar),
115.6 (d, J = 22 Hz, 4C, Ar), 72.0 (s, 2C, –N(Pr)CH2N(Ar)–), 70.3 (s,
1C, –N(Ar)CH2N(Ar)–), 54.1 (s, 1C, NCH2Et), 20.82 (s, 1C, NCH2CH2-
Me), 11.9 (s, 2C, NCH2CH2Me). 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282 MHz): d ꢀ124.6
(m).
TAC 2 (1.8 g, 5.68 mmol) and CrCl3(THF)3 (1.6 g, 4.28 mmol)
were stirred in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) for 20 h. Filtration, repeated wash-
ings with ether and drying in vacuo resulted in 0.98 g (48%) of a
purple solid. Anal. Calc. for C18H21N3F2CrCl3: C, 45.44; H, 4.45; N,
8.83. Found: C, 40.04; H, 4.58; N, 8.54%. (Anal. Calc. for
.
C18H21N3F2CrCl3 CH2Cl2: C, 40.70; H, 4.13; N, 7.49%.)
4.7. {Pr(p-C6H4F)2TAC}CrCl3 (7)
Anhydrous CrCl3 (100 mg, 0.63 mmol) and a catalytic amount of
Zn powder were suspended in toluene (15 mL). A solution of 3
(180 mg, 0.57 mmol) in toluene was added and the reaction mix-
ture was heated to reflux for 12 h. After cooling to room tempera-
ture, the resulting suspension was filtered and the precipitate
washed with ether, to yield after drying 147 mg (54%) of a purple
solid. Anal. Calc. for C18H21N3F2CrCl3: C, 45.44; H, 4.45; N, 8.83.
Found: C, 45.37; H, 4.10; N, 8.33%.
4.4. 1-iPr-3,5-bis(p-C6H4F)-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (4)
4.4.1. Experiment A
Isopropylamine (4.09 mL, 48 mmol) and p-fluoroaniline
(2.27 mL, 24 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (20 mL). An aqueous
solution of formaldehyde in water (37%, 2.7 mL, 36 mmol) was
added under stirring. The reaction mixture was kept at room tem-
perature for 8 h. The resulting precipitate was filtered and dried to
yield the required product after recrystallisation from hexane
3.49 g (91%). Anal. Calc. for C18H21N3F2: C, 68.12; H, 6.67; N,
13.24. Found: C, 68.09; H, 6.46; N, 13.10%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400
MHZ): d 6.95–6.85 (m, 8H, Ph), 4.58 (s, 2H, –N(Ar)CH2N(Ar)–),
4.24 (s, 4H, –N(iPr)CH2N(Ar)–), 3.00 (sep., J = 7 Hz, 1H, –CHMe2),
1.07 (d, J = 6 Hz, 6H, –CHMe2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): d
157.6 (d, J = 242 Hz, 2C, CArF), 145.7 (s, 2C, CArN), 119.6 (d,
J = 8 Hz, 4C, Ar), 115.6 (d, J = 22 Hz, 4C, Ar), 70.9 (s, 1C, –N(Ar)CH2-
N(Ar)–), 69.1 (s, 2C, –N(iPr)CH2N(Ar)–), 49.2 (s, 1C, –CHMe2), 18.5
(s, 2C, –CHMe2). 19F NMR (CDCl3, 282 MHz): d ꢀ125.2 (m).
4.8. {iso-Pr(p-C6H4F)2TAC}CrCl3 (8)
Analogous to 7, reaction of TAC 4 (0.45 g, 1.4 mmol) with CrCl3
(0.20 g, 1.3 mmol), yielded 8 in 0.20 g (32%). Anal. Calc. for
C18H21N3F2CrCl3: C, 45.44; H, 4.45; N, 8.83. Found: C, 44.97; H,
4.80; N, 8.63%. A sample was suspended in dry dichloromethane,
filtered and analysed by ESI-MS: m/z 548.1157 (calc. for M +
(NC4H12): 548.1140). The source of the ionising ammonium cation
NC4H12 was in the spectrometer and was confirmed by the obser-
vation of the analogous cation derived from a dichloromethane
solution of known (Octyl)3TACCrCl3 [2] at m/z 654.3988 (calc.
654.3989).
4.9. Computational studies
4.4.2. Experiment B
All calculations have been performed with a development ver-
sion of the ORCA electronic structure program version 2.7-00
[24] in combination with the split-valence (SV) and triple-f valence
(TZV) basis sets developed by the Karlsruhe group that were sup-
plemented with the appropriate polarization functions from the
TurboMole library [25,26].1 For the fitting basis sets in the RI-J
treatment, the ‘def2’ fit bases optimized for the SV and TZV basis
sets were used for DFT calculations, the standard integration grids
of the ORCA package were used. The ORCA implementation of zero
order relativistic correction (ZORA) and of a COSMO solvent model
Isopropylamine (3.5 mL, 41 mmol) and p-fluoroaniline (2.26 g
freshly vacuum-transfered, 20.3 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol
(16 mL). An aqueous solution of formaldehyde in water (37%,
2.3 mL, 31 mmol) was added under stirring. The reaction mixture
was kept at room temperature for 15 h. Even cooling to ꢀ20 °C
for 1 day gave no precipitate. The solvent was removed in vacuo
and trapped in liquid nitrogen and contained iPrNH2 and iPr3TAC
(about 2:1 by weight) besides EtOH and water by NMR. The
remaining oil was analysed by NMR (containing 48 mol%
(25 wt.%) ‘‘ArNH2” (13:8:1 mixture of the aniline and two aniline
like compounds with overlapping aromatic 1H signals and 19F sig-
nals at ꢀ126.9, ꢀ126.4 and ꢀ127.3 ppm, respectively), 0.2 mol%
(0.3 wt.%) Ar3TAC, 41 mol% (61 wt.%) Ar2iPrTAC, 13 mol% (4 wt.%)
AriPr2TAC and 1 mol% (1 wt.%) iPr3TAC) and then recrystallised
from hexane to obtain nearly pure 4 (only significant impurity is
ArNH2 at <10%). Addition of free aniline identified the NMR signals
for ArNH2 but also rearranged the product mixture within minutes
to release free iPrNH2 with a loss of iPr3TAC and AriPr2TAC forming
more Ar2iPrTAC and some Ar3TAC.
with infinite
e was used for all calculations. All calculations were
converged to 10ꢀ7 Eh in the total energy (ORCA keyword TightSCF).
Maximum integration grid 7 was used for chromium. Grimme’s
van der Waals corrections were used. Minima and transition states
were confirmed by numerical frequency calculations.
1
Basis sets were obtained from the ftp server of the Karlsruhe quantum chemistry
group, ftp.chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de/pub/basen.