C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
provides a powerful method for the enantio- and regioselective
synthesis of the 1,2-adduct.
In conclusion, an organocatalyst provides sufficient activation
of organoboronic acids to facilitate stereocontrol in the Petasis
transformation of quinolines as a result of the catalytic generation
of a chiral complex as well as the dual activation of an electrophile
and nucleophile.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by a Grant-
in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Y.T.) and Scientific Research
on Priority Areas: Advanced Molecular Transformations of Carbon
Resources (Y.T. and H.M.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, 21st Century COE Pro-
gram “Knowledge Information Infrastructure for Genome Science”.
Table 2. Reaction of 2a-f with 4A-F in the Presence of Catalyst
1ba
entry
substrate
boronic acid
T (°
C)
product (yield)
ee (%)
1
2
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2a
2a
2a
2a
2a
4A
4A
4A
4A
4A
4B
4C
4D
4E
4F
-65
-78
-65
-65
-65
-78
-78
-78
-65
-40
6bA (75%)
6cA (70%)
6dA (63%)
6eA (78%)
6fA (61%)
6aB (70%)
6aC (59%)
6aD (60%)
6aE (60%)
6aF (28%)
95
96
94
95
96
97
82
89
91
95
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data of all obtained compounds. This material is
3
4
5
6
References
7
8
(1) (a) Rakotoson, H.; Fabre, N.; Jacquemond-Collet, I.; Hannedouche, S.;
Fouraste, I.; Moulis, C. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 762. (b) Jacquemond-Collet,
I.; Hannedouche, S.; Fabre, N.; Moulis, C. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 1167.
(c) Houghton, P. J.; Woldemariam, T. Z.; Watanabe, Y.; Yates, M. Planta
Med. 1999, 65, 250.
(2) (a) Takamura, M.; Funabashi, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 6327. (b) Takamura, M.; Funabashi, K.; Kanai, M.;
Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6801. For addition to
isoquinolines, see: (c) Funabashi, K.; Ratni, H.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6801.
9
10
a Reaction was carried out with 1b (10 mol %) in CH2Cl2 by using
PhOCOCl (2 equiv), NaHCO3 (2 equiv), and H2O (56 equiv) for 24 h.
with a 1,3-amino alcohol functionality, only moderate selectivity
was achieved (entry 5). The use of catalysts 1d-g led to lower
ee.15 A 1,2-amino alcohol functionality on the catalyst was necessary
for valuable stereocontrol, as shown in the reaction with catalyst
1h as well as 1b (entry 6). The effect of a thiourea moiety in
catalysts was confirmed by using the simple 1,2-amino alcohol
catalyst 1i (entry 7). As expected, catalyst 1i also showed excellent
catalytic activity in this process, although the enantioselectivity was
decreased. These observations indicate that a 1,2-amino alcohol
functionality on catalysts activates boronic acid and the thiourea
moiety controls the distribution of s-trans/s-cis isomers of the amide
bond in N-phenoxycarbonyl quinolinium salt.2a To improve the
enantioselectivity of 5a, various reaction conditions were exam-
ined.16 The addition of H2O as a proton source increased the
enantioselectivity with a decrease in the yield (entry 8), and the
combination of H2O and NaHCO3 improved the chemical yield
(entry 9). A remarkable effect of H2O and NaHCO3 is assumed to
be the in situ regeneration of catalyst 1b promoted by a proton
source and removal of the resulting boronic acid by base.17An
outstanding level of enantioselectivity was also achieved in the
reaction of other quinolines 2b-f (Table 2, entries 1-5). The
reaction of quinoline 2c proceeded smoothly despite the presence
of a methyl group at the 3-position (entry 2). Under analogous
conditions, various boronic compounds 4B-E gave good results
(entries 6-9). As a general trend, electron-rich boronic acids are
more reactive in the Petasis reaction.5-7 Indeed, the reaction with
4B-D, which have an electron-donating substituent, took place even
at -78 °C. Although the formation of 6aF, which has an electron-
withdrawing substituent, was remarkably diminished, a high degree
of stereocontrol was achieved (entry 10).18
(3) (a) Alexakis, A.; Amiot, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2117. (b)
Amiot, F.; Cointeaux, L.; Silve, E. J.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron 2004,
60, 8221. (c) Cointeaux, L.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005,
16, 925.
(4) (a) Yoon, T. P.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 466.
(b) Taylor, M. S.; Tokunaga, N.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 6700.
(5) (a) Petasis, N. A.; Akritopoulou, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 34, 583. (b)
Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 445. (c)
Petasis, N. A.; Goodman, A.; Zavialov, I. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16463.
(6) For some selected examples, see: (a) Batey, R. A.; MacKay, D. B.;
Santhakumar, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5075. (b) Wang, Q.; Finn,
M. G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4063.
(7) (a) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11798.
(b) Harwood, L. M.; Currie, G. S.; Drew, M. G. B.; Luke, R. W. A. Chem.
Commun. 1996, 1953. (c) Nanda, K. K.; Trotter, B. W. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 2025. (d) Southwood, T. J.; Curry, M. C.; Hutton, C. A.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 236.
(8) For discussions on activation of N-acyl iminium ion by thiourea, see: (a)
Taylor, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10558. (b)
Pan, S. C.; Zhou, J.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1.
(9) (a) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
12672. (b) Hoashi, Y.; Okino, T.; Takemoto, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4032. (c) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Furukawa, T.; Xu, X.;
Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 119. (d) Inokuma, T.; Hoashi,
Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9413.
(10) For recent reviews on organocatalyst, see: (a) Pihko, P. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2062. (b) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 5138. (c) Houk, K. N., List, B., Eds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
37, 487 special issue on organocatalysis. (d) Bolm, C.; Rantanen, T.;
Schiffers, I.; Zani, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1758. (e) Seayad,
J.; List, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 719. (f) Takemoto, Y. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4299. (g) Taylor, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1520.
(11) Urea catalyst with a sulfinamide moiety was recently reported to promote
allylation of acylhydrazones using an indium reagent. See: Tan, K. L.;
Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1315.
(12) The solvent influenced the reactivity and enantioselectivity. A protic
solvent such as EtOH increased the addition rate, although no enantiose-
lectivity was observed. Good stereocontrol was achieved with the use of
aprotic and nonpolar solvents such as CH2Cl2 and toluene.
(13) The addition of AcCl, BzCl, Tf2O, Ac2O, or Boc2O instead of chloro-
formate led to lower ee.
(14) Chang, Y. M.; Lee, S. H.; Nam, M. H.; Cho, M. Y.; Park, Y. S.; Yoon,
C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3053.
(15) The results of reactions using catalysts 1d-g are given in the Supporting
Information.
(16) For example, the addition of Et3N or Na2CO3 as a base gave product 5a
in 32 or 91% ee, respectively. The addition of EtOH or CF3CH2OH as a
proton source was less effective and led to a lower ee.
(17) A similar trend was observed in the reaction of another quinoline 2b.
Thus, the use of H2O and NaHCO3 was found to be optimal for not only
enantioselectivity but also chemical efficiency.
The absolute configuration was determined by converting the
adduct 6aC into (+)-galipinine 7 (eq 2).1 The reaction of quinolines
is frequently plagued by the generation of regioisomeric 1,2- and
1,4-adducts;3 thus, it is also specifically noteworthy that this reaction
(18) The reaction with arylboronic acids bearing phenyl and p-methoxyphenyl
groups gave no desired products owing to their low reactivities.
JA071470X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 21, 2007 6687