Bao et al.
conformations in response to changes in the environment that
occur during the transfer process.36 The concentrations of the
components have to be at least in the low micromolar range to
obtain an observable amount of intracellular material. This
minimal concentration is consistent with magnitude of the KA’s
for the complexes in buffered water (pH 7.3), DMSO, and
CHCl3, which range from 2 × 104 to 9 × 105 M-1. These
solutions were used to represent the polarities of the aqueous
domain, cellular surface, and lipid portion of cells, respectively.38
We also observed a slight concentration dependence for the
amount of material that entered the cells.36 These results suggest
that the HRs are acting as transporters, whereby an HR forms
a noncovalent complex with an impermeable material and carries
it across the membrane. Such a transport process would depend
on the ability of an HR to form a complex in the environments
that impede delivery.
Herein, we compare the abilities of Cy3R and Cy2R 2 to
bind highly charged and apolar guests in various solvents
(buffered water, DMSO, and MeCN) and determine whether
an observed binding selectivity correlates to more material being
brought into COS 7 cells. Fl-AVWAL and Fl-QEAVD were
initially chosen to test transfer. Fl-AVWAL has apolar side
chains. The Cy3R‚Fl-AVWAL complex should be more stable
than the Cy2R 2‚Fl-AVWAL complex in water because of the
additional aromatic surfaces of Cy3R. Fl-QEAVD contains
negatively charged side chains. The additional arginine moieties
of Cy3R should make additional salt bridges with the negatively
charged side chains. Thus, the Cy3R‚Fl-QEAVD complex
should be more stable than the Cy2R 2‚Fl-QEAVD complex in
apolar solvents or environments. Buffered water, DMSO, and
MeCN were chosen to represent the environments outside the
cells, at the cell surface, and within the lipid membrane,
respectively. MeCN was chosen instead of CHCl3, which was
used in earlier studies, to increase the solubility of some of the
highly charged guests. The interaction strength for charged or
polar groups diminishes from water to DMSO to MeCN. Thus,
we predicted that apolar guests would be bound the strongest
in buffered water and charged guests would be bound the
strongest in MeCN. A comparison is also made between the
new HRs and Cy2R 1.
We discovered that Cy3R can form substantially more
favorable complexes than Cy2R 2. Cy3R efficiently transports
both Fl-peptides into cells, whereas Cy2R 2, surprisingly, does
not. We initially thought that the properties of Cy2R 2 and Cy2R
1 would be similar because Cy2R 2 is a modified version of
Cy2R 1. Cy2R 2’s pocket is slightly larger and contains an
additional piperidinyl ring (Figure 1). Also contrary to our
expectations, we found that more stable complexes exist for
some of the charged and polar guests in DMSO than in MeCN.
The results of these experiments suggest that the open and closed
conformations are important features of Cy3R and Cy2R 2.
Having two wheels, Cy3R can exist in an open conformation
for one wheel and a closed conformation for the other (an open-
closed conformation). These dominant conformations are most
likely responsible for the unexpected binding energy and,
consequently, responsible for the different transporting abilities
of Cy3R and Cy2R 2. We found that for HRs that form a very
stable complex with a guest in DMSO, which has a similar
polarity as the cell surface, significantly enhanced amounts of
guest peptide enters into cells in the presence of the HR.
Complex formation depends on the intrinsic attraction
between an HR and a guest and the concentration of the
components. To more fully explore the necessity of complex
formation for delivery, a host-[3]rotaxane (Cy3R, Figure 1) and
Cy2R 2 were created. The HRs contain a larger, more rigid
cyclophane pocket than for Cy2R 134 to potentially produce
more stable complexes. Cy3R contains a second wheel. We
envisioned that the additional aromatic rings of the second wheel
would stabilize guests in an aqueous environment, and that the
additional arginine moieties would more efficiently cover polar
or charged groups of a guest as it passes through the membrane.
The arginines could also enhance the effective molarity of the
host-rotaxane at the cell surface through their attraction to the
phosphates on the cell surfaces. These HRs should form
complexes with substantially different stabilities, and these
differences should be reflected in the amount of material brought
into cells if transport occurs.
(21) Causton, A. S.; Sherman, J. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 23-
27.
(22) Peluso, S.; Dumy, P.; Eggleston, I. M.; Garrouste, P.; Mutter, M.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7231-7236.
(23) Schneider, J. P.; Kelly, J. W. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2169-2187.
(24) Tuchscherer, G.; Domer, B.; Sila, U.; Kamber, B.; Mutter, M.
Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 3559-3575.
(25) Mutter, M.; Tuchscherer, G. G.; Miller, C.; Altmann, K. H.; Carey,
R.; Wyss, D.; Ladhardt, A.; Rivier, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
1463-1470.
(26) Collin, J. P.; Heitz, V.; Bonnet, S.; Sauvage, J. P. Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 8, 1063-1074.
(27) Sauvage, J. P. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1507-1510.
(28) Schalley, C. A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004, 17, 967-972.
(29) Dietrich-Buchecker, C.; Jimenez-Molero, M. C.; Sartor, V.; Sauvage,
J. P. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 1383-1393.
Results
Design of the Host-Rotaxanes and Experimental Methods.
Of proteins, host-rotaxanes most closely mimic antibodies.
Antibodies can contain small binding domains and use a few
to all of six hypervariable peptide loops (complementary
determining regions) to bind a ligand.39-41 We envisioned the
pocket of the host-rotaxane being a mimic of the shallow groove
and a functionalized dibenzyl-24-crown-8 ring mimicking a
hypervariable loop. Fluorescein was chosen as the initial guest
since its association with a host can be monitored by fluores-
cence quenching assays, and cellular delivery can be monitored
(30) Clemente-Leon, M.; Marchioni, F.; Silvi, S.; Credi, A. Synth. Met.
2003, 139, 773-777.
(31) Armaroli, N.; Balzani, V.; Collin, J. P.; Gavina, P.; Sauvage, J. P.;
Ventura, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4397-4408.
(32) Balzani, B.; Gomex-Lopez, M.; Stoddart, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998,
31, 405-414.
(33) Molecular Catenanes, Rotaxanes and Knots: A Journey through
the World of Molecular Topology; Sauvage, J.-P., Dietrich-Buchecker, C.
O., Eds., Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1999.
(34) Dvornikovs, V.; House, B. E.; Kaetzel, M.; Dedman, J. R.; Smithrud,
D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8290-8301.
(35) Smukste, I.; House, B. E.; Smithrud, D. B. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 2559-2571.
(36) Bao, X.; Isaacsohn, I.; Drew, A. F.; Smithrud, D. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 12229-12238.
(37) Wang, X.; Bao, X.; McFarland-Mancini, M.; Isaacsohn, I.; Drew,
A. F.; Smithrud, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. In press.
(38) Avdeef, A. Absorption and Drug DeVelopment: Solubility, Perme-
ability, and Charge State; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, 2003: Chapter
5.
(39) Padlan, E. A. Antibody-Antigen Complexes; R.G. Landes Com-
pany: Austin, TX, 1994.
(40) Getzoff, E. D.; Geysen, H. M.; Rodda, S. J.; Alexander, H.; Tainer,
J. A.; Lerner, R. A. Science 1987, 235, 1191-1196.
(41) Geysen, H. M.; Barteling, S. J.; Meloen, R. H. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82, 178-182.
3990 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 11, 2007