X. Su et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 9 (2006) 986–988
987
Cl
X
O
S
O
NH2
H2O
+
N
N
NH4SCN
H
H
Cl
Cl
Reflux
N
HN
O
NH
O
HN
NH
O
2
2
C
S
C
S
Cl
Cl
HN NH2
NaOH
acetone-ZDA
NH
S
(acac)H/acetone=2:1
S
Zn
O O
Zn
O O
45oC
O
Zn
H2N
O
O
O
O
b
a
Scheme 1.
Fig. 1. (a) The molecule of PZDA; (b) the coordination compounds with
long ligands.
centrosymmetric space groups, and showed no SHG effect
[9,10]. It seemed to us that the screw shape of the mole-
cule can not guarantee the formation of NCS, and it
may be necessary to consider the ratio of the length to
the width in the ‘‘screw’’. In our case, the compounds
in Refs. [8,9] may be a little too long, and the ratio is a
little too high. Therefore we have recently synthesized
some new L Æ Zn(acac)2 with a shorter L. This paper
describes the synthesis,crystal structure and NLO prop-
erty of one compound,namely (o-chlorophenylthiourea
zinc(II) diacetylacetonate.
The synthetic route is illustrated in Scheme 1. The ligand
o-chlorophenylthiourea was synthesized by an operation
described in Ref. [11]. The acetone zinc (II) diacetylaceto-
nate (acetone–ZDA) was prepared according to the litera-
ture [12]. The coordination compound was prepared by
reaction of (2-chloro-phenyl)-thiourea with acetone solu-
tion of equimolar acetone–ZDA at 45 ꢁC for about 5 h.
The product was purified by recrystallization from a mix-
ture of acetone and acetylacetone (2:1 volume ratio). The
ligand and the coordination compound were characterized
by IR and EA.1
Single crystals of the coordination compound were
grown from an acetone–acetylacetone (1:1) solution by
solvent evaporation in air and the structure was deter-
mined by X-ray single crystal structure analysis.2 The
ORTEP drawing of the compound with numbered atoms
Fig. 2. ORTEP view of the molecular structure of coordination com-
pound. Selected Bond lengths (A) and Angels (ꢁ): Zn(1)-O(1) 2.011(11),
´
˚
Zn(1)-O(2) 2.054(9), Zn(1)-O(3) 2.063(10), Zn(1)-O(4) 2.011(9), Zn(1)-S(1)
2.380(4), C(7)-N(2) 1.274(19), C(7)-N(1) 1.329(18), C(7)-S(1) 1.704(13),
C(9)-O(1) 1.219(19), C(11)-O(2) 1.243(17), C(14)-O(3) 1.238(16), C(16)-
O(4), 1.295(17), C(6)-Cl(1) 1.696(17), C(5)-N(1) 1.43(2); O(4)-Zn(1)-O(1)
144.0(5), O(4)-Zn(1)-O(2) 83.4(4), O(1)-Zn(1)-O(2) 87.7(5), O(4)-Zn(1)-
O(3) 88.9(4), O(1)-Zn(1)-O(3) 85.7(4), O(2)-Zn(1)-O(3) 156.9(5), O(4)-
Zn(1)-S(1) 109.3(3), O(1)-Zn(1)-S(1) 106.6(4), O(2)-Zn(1)-S(1) 100.7(4),
O(3)-Zn(1)-S(1) 102.4(3).
1
Ligand: Yield 72%. IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 3415.2, 3187.6, 3270.5,
3066.4, 1618.8, 1579.5, 1501.1, 1453.2, 1481.4, 1233.4, 1057.4, 804.5, 614.2.
Anal. (%), Found: C: 44.90, H: 3.92, N: 15.22, S: 17.01; (Calcd.: C: 45.04,
H: 3.78, N: 15.01, S: 17.18). Coordination compound: Yield 59%. IR data
(KBr, cmÀ1): 3392.0, 3165.2, 3265.2, 3032.2, 2954.6, 2916.0, 1633.9,
1591.7, 1521.5, 1494.0, 1454.9, 1264.8, 1186.5, 1015.7, 800.5, 761.1.
Anal.(%), Found: C: 45.44, H: 4.58, N: 6.20, S: 7.22; (Calcd.: C: 45.26, H:
4.70, N: 6.22, S: 7.12).
is shown in Fig. 2. The zinc atom is coordinated to four
oxygen atoms of two (acac) groups and one sulfur atom
of ligand to form a square–pyramid configuration. The
whole molecule can be seen as a screw, in which two
(acac) groups form the ‘‘head’’ and the ligand forms the
‘‘tail’’. The ratio of the tail length to the head width is
nearly 1:1. Four ZnAO bond lengths are not equal but
2
Crystal data for compound: C17H20ClN2O4SZn, M = 449.23, mono-
˚
˚
˚
clinic, space group Pc, a = 7.534(3) A, b = 14.314(5) A, c = 9.316(3) A,
3
3
˚
b = 95.113(6)ꢁ, V = 1000.6(6) A , T = 292(2) K, Z = 2, Dc = 1.491 g/cm ,
l = 1.489 mmÀ1, F(000) = 462, k = 0.71073 A. Of 2301 reflections mea-
˚
sured, 1625 were unique (Rint = 0.0181) and were used in all calculations.
The final R1[I > 2r(I)] = 0.0701, wR2 = 0.1814 (all data). The CCDC #:
605779.
˚
have a disparity of about 0.05 A at maximum. The