A R T I C L E S
Mantion et al.
Scheme 1. Oligovaline Peptidesa
solution was allowed to warm up to room temperature, upon which
the solution was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed by rotary
evaporation, and the residue was dissolved in 200 mL of chloroform.
The organic solution was washed three times with 100 mL of a mixture
of saturated hydrogen carbonate solution and sodium chloride, once
with aqueous sodium chloride, three times with 100 mL of 10% citric
acid and aqueous sodium chloride, and twice with aqueous sodium
chloride. The organic phase was dried with sodium sulfate, concentrated
to dryness, and the residue was triturated with pentane to give a white
solid (3.4 g, 75%) after drying. IR (neat, cm-1) 3479, 3277, 3063, 2976,
1633, 1533, 1429, 1393, 1371, 1349, 1283, 1247, 1222, 1153, 1088,
1071, 1038, 1028, 1020, 1005, 987, 920, 908, 864, 846, 799, 774, 753,
740, 698, 667. Elemental analysis calculated: C 62.92, H 8.35, N 7.10,
O 21.63; measured: C 62.97, H 8.32, N 7.19. FAB-MS calculated
[M-H]+ ) 592, measured [M-H]+ ) 592. 13C NMR (δ in ppm vs
TMS, d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) 172.25, 171.84, 171.70, 171.51, 156.91,
137.96, 129.16, 128.56, 128.52, 128.45, 81.40, 80.56, 66.19, 61.11,
57.94, 52.58, 31.71, 31.12, 28.56, 28.43, 27.04, 20.11, 20.01, 18.99,
18.96. 1H NMR (δ in ppm vs TMS, d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) 8.23 (d, 0.9
H, H amide), 8.1 (d, 0.1 H, H amide), 7.92 (d, 0.1 H, H amide), 7.72
(d, 0.8 H, H amide), 7.33 (m, 6 H, H phenyl + H carbamate), 5.01 (s,
2 H, benzyl), 4.22 (t, 1 H, R Val-1), 4.12 (m, 1 H, R Val-2), 3.94 (m,
1 H, R Glu), 2.22 (m, 2 H, γ Glu), 1.92 (m, 3 H, â Val-1 + â Val 2
+ â Glu), 1.72 (m, 1 H, â Glu), 1.36 (m, 18 H, tert-butyl ester x 2),
0.83 (m, 12 H, γ Val-1 + γ Val-2)
a 1 is the parent compound used in our earlier studies.29,30 2 is the peptide
ligand used for construction of the MPFs and for magnetic dilution in the
EPR experiments in the current paper.
them prime candidates for the fabrication of chiral MOFs. Chiral
MOFs are, beyond the more fundamental search for new
topologies, highly attractive as asymmetric catalysts, for chiral
recognition, and applications requiring noncentrosymmetric
crystal structures like nonlinear optical devices.22-26
There are essentially three approaches for the preparation of
chiral MOFs: (i) the exploitation of molecules, where the chiral
resolution happens without further assistance,27 (ii) the use of
chiral co-ligands in addition to achiral connectors,23 or (iii) the
use of a chiral connector.25,28 The chiral connector approach is
currently most often used because of its flexibility.22-28
We have recently introduced a family of self-assembling
peptides based on oligovalines. These peptides gel a variety of
solvents, including the inorganic liquid tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS). Furthermore, they act as templates for complex titania
and silver/peptide nanostructures.29,30 The current paper shows
that replacing one valine unit with a glutamic acid, Scheme 1,
leads to peptides that can form peptide analogs of MOFs, which
we have termed metal peptide frameworks (MPFs). The peptides
form strong bonds with Cu2+ and Ca2+, and the resulting
crystalline materials precipitate from solution as long needle-
like micrometer-sized particles.
Z-L-Val-L-Val-L-Glu(OH)OH 2. Two grams of Z-L-Val-L-Val-
L-Glu(OtBu)OtBu were reacted with 25 mL of a 95% aqueous
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) solution for 30 min under argon. Then the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was treated
three times with 30 mL of chloroform. After evaporation of the
chloroform, the slightly yellow solid was triturated with diethyl ether,
filtered, and the whitish solid was dried overnight under vacuum,
leaving 1.29 g of white solid 2 (80%). IR (neat, cm-1) 3289, 3074,
2976, 1637, 1530, 1419, 1340, 1293, 1242, 1217, 1179, 1150, 1075,
1043, 1029, 995, 965, 934, 917, 859, 842, 798, 778, 756, 736, 697.
FAB-MS: calculated [M-H]+ ) 480; measured [M-H]+ ) 480.
Elemental analysis calculated: C 57.61, H 6.94, N 8.76, O 26.69;
1
measured: C 56.91, H 6.90, N 8.60. H NMR (δ in ppm vs TMS,
d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) 12.35 (very broad, 2 H, acidic protons), 8.17 (d,
0.94 H, H amide), 8.03 (d, 0.17 H, H amide), 7.90 (d, 0.12 H, H amide),
7.72 (d, 0.9 H, H amide), 7.36 (m, 6 H, H carbamate + H phenyl),
5.01 (s, 2 H, H benzylic), 4.18 (m, 2 H, R Val-1 + R Val-2), 3.92 (m,
1 H, R Glu), 1.94 (m, 3 H, 1H â-Glu + â Val-1 + â Val-2), 1.76 (m,
1 H, 1 H â Glu), 0.82 (m, 14 H, 2 H γ Glu + 6 H γ Val-1 + 6 H γ
Val-2). 13C NMR (δ in ppm vs TMS, d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) 174.59,
173.91, 172.95, 171.82, 156.94, 137.95, 129.99, 129.39, 129.25, 66.20,
61.13, 58.13, 51.98, 31.63, 31.08, 30.80, 27.04, 20.08, 19.96, 19.03,
18.95.
Experimental
Materials. Amino acids were purchased from Bachem AG (Buben-
dorf, Switzerland), and all other chemicals were purchased from Fluka
(Buchs, Switzerland). All chemicals were used as received.
Ligand Synthesis. The synthesis of the precursor peptide ZVVOH
and of peptide 1 has been described elsewhere.29
Z-L-Val-L-Val-L-Glu(OtBu)OtBu. Isobutyl chloroformate (1.4 mL,
10.3 mmol) was added to a salt/ice cooled solution of Z-L-Val-L-Val-
OH (3.0 g, 8.6 mmol) and 4-methylmorpholine (1.7 mL, 14.6 mmol)
in 25 mL of acetonitrile under argon. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 2 min. Then, 3.0 g (10.3 mmol) of L-glutamic acid di-tert-butyl
ester hydrochloride and 1.7 mL (14.6 mmol) of 4-methylaminomor-
pholine were added. After 15 min, the cooling was removed and the
Complex Synthesis. The metal complexes were prepared by
dissolving peptide 2 in a 60/40 (v/v) ethanol/water mixture. The pH of
the solution was adjusted to pH 8 with diluted aqueous ammonia. In a
typical experiment, 56 µL of a 3 mM aqueous copper(II) or calcium
nitrate solution were added to the ligand solution at room temperature
under stirring. After copper or calcium salt addition, the pH was
readjusted to 8. The copper complex (MPF-9) immediately precipitated,
and the calcium complex (MPF-2) precipitated after 1 h at 80 °C. To
complete the reaction, the reaction mixture was further reacted for 48
h at 80 °C in a closed vessel. Then, the solids were centrifuged, washed
with ethanol, and dried under vacuum overnight. Various metal/peptide
ratios were used during the synthesis, but all precipitates had a 1:1
metal/peptide stoichiometry. Yields were above 99%. Elemental analysis
(MPF-2, C23H39CaN3O12) calculated: C 46.85, H 6.67, N 7.13, O 32.56,
Ca 6.80; measured: C 47.80, H 6.29, N 7.57. Elemental analysis
(MPF-9 corresponding to the dibasic form of 2 plus 1 Cu2+ plus 2
(22) Kesanli, B.; Lin, W.-B. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2003, 246, 305.
(23) Bradshaw, D.; Claridge, J. B.; Cussen, E. J.; Prior, T. J.; Rosseinsky, M.
J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 273.
(24) Zang, S.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Meng, Q. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 2972.
(25) Lin, W. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 2488.
(26) Sun, D.; Ke, Y.; Collins, D. J.; Lorigan, G. A.; Zhou, H.-C. Inorg. Chem.
2007, 46, 2725.
(27) Gao, E.-Q.; Yue, Y.-F.; Bai, S.-Q.; He, Z.; Yan, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 1419.
(28) Wu, C.-D.; Hu, A.; Zhang, L.; Lin, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8940.
(29) Mantion, A.; Taubert, A. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7, 208.
(30) Mantion, A.; Guex, G.; Foelske, A.; Mirolo, L.; Fromm, K. M.; Painsi,
M.; Taubert, A. Soft Matter, 2008, DOI: 10.1039)b712826f.
9
2518 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 8, 2008