3364
J. A. O’Meara et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 3362–3366
known RT sequences3 and has been implicated in tem-
plate primer utilization (3) the 4-position of the anilide
phenyl ring points directly toward a channel which is
lined by Pro236 and leads to solvent; (4) the inhibitor
binds in a ‘kinked’ conformation which involves a rota-
tion about the S–CH2–CO–N dihedral angle from 180°
in the fully extended free-state conformation to almost
0° in the bound state. This brings the two substituted
phenyl rings into close proximity and results in the
amide N–H pointing toward the sulfur.
amide conformation, was converted to the tertiary
amide 15. By 1H NMR in DMSO at room temperature,
15 exists as a 9:1 mixture of s-cis/s-trans amide rotamers.
Gratifyingly, a 22-fold improvement in potency was
observed relative to 14. However, tertiary amide 15
was 14-fold less potent compared to its reference thio-
tetrazole derivative 11 against K103N/Y181C and 96-
fold less potent versus the WT enzyme. It is interesting
to note that for the first time a compound was observed
to be more potent against the double mutant K103N/
Y181C than against WT reverse transcriptase. An
X-ray crystal structure was obtained for 16 bound to
the NNRTI binding pocket (data not shown) and in-
deed, it was found to bind as predicted with only minor
shifts in binding mode relative to that of the thio-tetra-
zole inhibitors. In order to further evaluate the potential
of the tertiary amide series, structure–activity relation-
ship studies were initiated.
Interestingly, however, no discernable interaction was
apparent for the thio-tetrazole motif which was vital
for potency. These data suggested that the tetrazole por-
tion of these inhibitors could simply be acting as a scaf-
fold which orients the pharmacophores into the proper
geometry for binding. Based on the above, we hypothe-
sized that alternate, potentially more stable scaffolds
could be designed.
Initially, the tertiary amide N-substituent was examined.
It was rapidly discovered that a small primary aliphatic
group was required. The N-ethyl analog 16 (Table 3)
was optimal with IC50‘s of 340 and 207 nM versus WT
and K103/Y181C. This was roughly 2-fold better than
N-methyl compound 15. The N-allyl derivative 17 was
equipotent to the N-ethyl compound 16 versus the dou-
ble mutant, however, it was less potent against wild-type
enzyme. The secondary aliphatic substituent N-cyclo-
propyl in 18 was not well tolerated, especially versus
the wild-type RT. Trifluoroethyl analog 19 represents
an attempt to subtly alter the electronic characteristics
of 16, while maintaining a similar steric volume. The
compound demonstrated a decreased affinity, losing
3.5-fold affinity against both enzymes.
Detailed examination of the bound conformation dem-
onstrated the obvious cis orientation of the tetrazole
appendages and that the N-2-chlorophenyl substituent
rests essentially perpendicular to the plane of the tetra-
zole. We therefore anticipated that we could mimic this
bound conformation with a variety of appropriately
substituted tertiary amides, carbamates or thiocarba-
mates. The structural rationale for this idea is as follows:
Tertiary amides such as 15 (Table 3) exist in either the
s-cis or s-trans conformation. The s-cis conformation
is preferred because of an unfavorable 1,5-steric interac-
tion between the N-methyl substituent and the protons
a to the carbonyl in the s-trans orientation. Further-
more, as in the bound conformation of the tetrazole
derivatives, the aromatic ring is forced to be perpendic-
ular to the plane of the amide in order to minimize a
similar destabilizing steric interaction between the aro-
matic o-substituents and the protons a to the tertiary
amide carbonyl.
We next focused on the influence of altering the nature
of the functional group of the alternate scaffold. The
general synthetic route utilized to obtain the desired
compounds was straightforward and is depicted in
Scheme 1.6 Chlorination of commercially available 4-
tert-butyl aniline (20) was accomplished in acetonitrile
using N-chlorosuccinimide. The 2-chloro aniline was
then treated with acetyl chloride and the resulting amide
was reduced using borane–dimethylsulfide complex to
give the secondary aniline 21 in good yield. Compound
21 was treated with 3-carbomethoxypropionyl chloride
to provide the amide intermediate. Alternatively, 21
was treated with phosgene to access the carbamoyl chlo-
ride which was in turn treated with the sodium salts of
methyl glycolate, methyl thioglycolate or with glycine
methyl ester hydrochloride to give the carbamate, thioc-
arbamate, and urea intermediates. Treatment of these
intermediates with lithium hydroxide generated the cor-
responding acids. Finally, amide formation with aniline
22 in pyridine using phosphorus trichloride followed by
treatment with sodium hydroxide in DMSO provided
the desired inhibitors 23, 24, 25, and 26.
The scaffold hopping5 hypothesis was evaluated when
secondary amide 14, a very weak inhibitor of K103N/
Y181C which exists almost exclusively in the s-trans
Table 3. SAR of tertiary amides
O
O
R
Cl
N
HN
Cl
OH
O
O
Compound
R
IC50 (nM)
t1/2 HLM
(min)
WT
K103N/Y181C
14
15
16
17
18
19
H
Me
6060
673
4620
328
207
237
506
718
ND
54
6
The amide 23 (Table 4) was prepared as a reference for
this study and it is noteworthy that the small change in
the biphenyl substitution from phenoxy-acetic acid
(compound 19) to the shorter acetic acid in compound
23 translated to 2.5-fold decrease in wild-type potency.
Et
340
520
Allyl
c-Pr
CH2CF3
9
1922
1117
15
ND