reaction without sacrificing the enantioselectivity. The
reactivity profiles of 3c-f were compared by the cyclization
of keto-aldehyde 4 (Table 2, entries 2-5).
Table 3. Enantioselective Benzoin Cyclizations of
Keto-Aldehydes 10-14a
Several trends became obvious: (1) Introduction of the
ortho-substituents led to a decreased ee:12 Although o,o′-
difluoro precatalyst 3c could suppress the side reaction
completely, the ee was slightly lower (entry 2). In the case
of the o-fluoro precatalyst 3d, a sizable amount of the aldol
byproducts was produced (entry 3). (2) Meta-disubstituted
precatalysts gave favorable results in suppressing the aldol
reaction without loss of the ee: m,m′-Difluoro precatalyst
3e gave the product in high yield as well as high ee (entry
4). The m,m′-bis(trifluoromethyl) precatalyst 3f gave the best
result, providing optimal yield and ee (entry 5).
Having found a promising triazolium salt 3f, the scope
and limitation were compared with that of 3a with attention
to the reactivity, enantioselectivity, and the extent of compet-
ing aldol reaction (Table 3). In every case listed, the
cyclization yields were higher with modified precatalyst 3f
in comparison to the original Rovis precatalyst 3a. The
enantioselectivities were generally better with 3f, except in
one case. Entry 1 shows the reaction of keto-aldehyde 10
having a methyl group: Cyclization occurred smoothly with
3f in an excellent selectivity, while aldol-type side reactions
were serious when 3a was used. Entry 2 shows the reaction
of highly enolizable keto-aldehyde 11 to give 3-hydroxy-
isoflavanone 16.13 The yield was extremely low in the case
of 3a (13%), whereas 3f gave a much better yield with an
excellent selectivity (61% yield, 90% ee), although side
products were also observed (27%). Biaryl keto-aldehydes1
12 and 13 showed the same trend (entries 3 and 4). The
optimized conditions by using 3f led to the high-yield
formation of (S)-R-ketols with excellent selectivities.14
Furthermore, cyclization of aryl keto-aliphatic aldehyde 14
was possible only with 3f to give R-ketol 19 in high yield,
albeit with moderate selectivity (entry 5).
a Unless otherwise indicated, all reactions were performed with 3f or 3a
(15 mol %) and Et3N (10 mol %) in toluene at room temperature.
Enantiomeric excesses were assessed by HPLC analysis on CHIRALPAK
AD-H or CHIRALCEL OD-H. b The absolute configurations were con-
firmed by X-ray analysis of the corresponding (S)-camphanyl derivatives.
c The corresponding byproducts were also obtained (entry 1: 43%; entry
2: 82%; entry 3: 18%; entry 4: 37%). d The corresponding benzofuran
and aldol were also obtained in 27% combined yield. e Performed with 3a
(10 mol %) and DBU (20 mol %) in THF. f Performed with 3a (20 mol %)
and DBU (20 mol %) in THF. g Performed with 3f (20 mol %) and Et3N
(20 mol %) in toluene.
At this stage, we embarked on the synthesis of (+)-
sappanone B (1). As the cyclization substrate, keto-aldehyde
2 was prepared from the commercially available aldehyde
20 in five steps (Scheme 2). After acetylation of the phenol
in 20, the aldehyde was protected as a 1,3-dioxane acetal,
and deacetylation gave phenol 21 in 95% yield.15 Although
a detour, this temporary acetylation was essential, since the
direct acetalization of 20 failed under a variety of conditions.
Alkylation of phenol 21 with N-methoxy-N-methylchloro-
acetamide16 proceeded in quantitative yield of Weinreb amide
22. Treatment of amide 22 with a benzyl Grignard reagent,17
followed by hydrolysis of the acetal gave keto-aldehyde 2
in 87% yield (2 steps).
Scheme 2. Preparation of Keto-Aldehyde 2
(12) The corresponding reaction by using the triazolium salt with the
ortho-mono-methylated N-phenyl group [15 mol %, Et3N (10 mol %),
toluene, room temperature] provided R-ketol 5 in poorer selectivity (44%,
62% ee).
(13) (a) Minhaj, N.; Tasneem, K.; Khan, Z.; Zaman, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1977, 18, 1145-1148. (b) Kim, C.-M.; Ebizuka, Y.; Sankawa, U.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 2879-2881. (c) Vila, J.; Balderrama, L.;
Bravo, J. L.; Almanza, G.; Codina, C.; Bastida, J.; Connolly, J. Phytochem-
istry 1998, 49, 2525-2528. (d) Gutierrez-Lugo, M.-T.; Woldemichael, G.
M.; Singh, M. P.; Suarez, P. A.; Maiese, W. M.; Montenegro, G.;
Timmermann, B. N. Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19, 173-179.
(14) The origin of the reversal of stereoinduction between biaryl keto-
aldehyde and others is under investigation.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 14, 2007
2715