Angewandte
Chemie
Wenthold, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 7332; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 7170.
[4] H. A. Lardin, J. J. Nash, P. G. Wenthold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 12612.
[11] T. Sato, H. Niino, A. Yabe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11936.
[12] Similar to the triplet state of tetrafluoro-m-didehydrobenzene,[8]
both DFT methods yield a Cs-symmetric structure for the lowest
quartet state of 4, deviating slightly from planarity. At the BLYP
level, the 4A’’ state of 4 is adiabatically 24.9 kcalmolÀ1 higher in
energy than the 2A1 ground state.
[5] For recent reviews, see: a) W. Sander, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32,
669; b) H. H. Wenk, M. Winkler, W. Sander, Angew. Chem. 2003,
115, 518; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 502; c) M. Winkler,
H. H. Wenk, W. Sander in Reactive Intermediate Chemistry
(Eds.: R. A. Moss, M. S. Platz, M. Jones, Jr.), Wiley, New York,
2004.
[6] Representative studies related to the structure and properties of
meta-didehydrobenzene: a) R. Marquardt, W. Sander, E. Kraka,
Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 82 5;Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996,
35, 746; b) E. Kraka, D. Cremer, G. Bucher, H. Wandel, W.
Sander, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 313; c) P. G. Wenthold,
R. R. Squires, W. C. Lineberger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
5279; d) E. Kraka, J. Anglada, A. Hjerpe, M. Filatov, D. Cremer,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 348, 115; e) M. Winkler, W. Sander, J.
Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 10422; f) W. Sander, M. Exner, M.
Winkler, A. Balster, A. Hjerpe, E. Kraka, D. Cremer, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13072; g) M. Winkler, B. Cakir, W. Sander,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6135.
[7] Generally, fluorine atoms tend to avoid acetylenic positions and
often prevent ring-opening reactions of aromatic intermediates.
Similarly, difluorovinylidene has been studied in detail in
cryogenic matrices, whereas the parent vinylidene readily
rearranges to acetylene: a) J. Breidung, H. Bürger, C. Kötting,
R. Kopitzky, W. Sander, M. Senzlober, W. Thiel, H. Willner,
Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2072; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 1983; b) W. Sander, C. Kötting, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5,
24.
[8] a) H. H. Wenk, W. Sander, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1837; b) H. H.
Wenk, W. Sander, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3927, and references
therein. For a computational study, see: c) C. E. Smith, T. D.
Crawford, D. Cremer, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 174309.
[9] The formation of several low-molecular-weight products has
been observed in many FVP experiments with fluorinated
systems. See, for example: a) H. F. Bettinger, H. Peng, J. Phys.
Chem. B 2005, 109, 23218; b) R. Butler, A. Snelson, J. Fluorine
Chem. 1980, 15, 345.
[13] a) DFT calculations were carried out with Gaussian 03: Gaus-
sian03, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria,
M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., T. Vreven,
K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi,
V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A.
Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R.
Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O.
Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian,
J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts,
R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli,
J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P.
Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D.
Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K.
Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul,
S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P.
Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A.
Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe,
P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez,
and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004. b) Ab
initio computations were carried out with Molpro 2000.1: H.-J.
Werner, P. J. Knowles, Molpro 2000.1, Birmingham, 1999.
[14] a) A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098; b) C. Lee, W. Yang,
R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785; c) A. D. Becke, J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
[15] CCSD(T) calculations employed the partially spin-restricted
open-shell coupled cluster (RHF-RCCSD(T)) program: a) P. J.
Knowles, C. Hampel, H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99,
5219; b) P. J. Knowles, C. Hampel, H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys.
2000, 112, 3106.
[16] Distances of two of the radical centers have been frozen and all
other coordinates optimized at the DFT level within the
constraint to C2v symmetry. Subsequently, CCSD(T) calculations
have been carried out on the geometries obtained from these
calculations.
[10] The higher reactivity of phenyl radicals compared to benzynes is
well established. See, for example: a) M. J. Schottelius, P. Chen,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4896; b) C. F. Logan, P. Chen, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2113; c) P. Chen, Angew. Chem. 1996,
108, 1584; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1478; d) J. H.
Hoffner, M. J. Schottelius, D. Feichtinger, P. Chen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 376.
[17] For 1, which already has a rather bicyclic structure,[3] fluorination
leads to a stabilization of the 2B2 state which becomes the ground
state of trifluoro-1,2,3-tridehydrobenzene, without changing the
structure of either state significantly. On the basis of steric
effects alone, the opposite tendency would be expected. Thus,
electronic effects are likely to play an important role here as
well.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4888 –4893ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim