C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
SN2 methyl-transfer in ACS/COdH can proceed through a Ni0
intermediate. Importantly, these studies provide a chemical reactiv-
ity-based rationale for the ordered binding of Me, then CO, during
ACS catalysis. In vitro experiments and structure-based arguments
have proven contentious with regard to the order of binding during
catalysis. We are currently investigating the kinetics of this reaction
to obtain a more detailed understanding of the mechanism.
Acknowledgment. The authors acknowledge the National
Institutes of Health (Grant GM059191) for funding and Steve Bai
for interpretation of 2D 31P NMR spectra.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, spectral
characterization, and full crystallographic data for (triphos)Ni(PPh3)
and [(triphos)NiMe]OTf. This material is available free of charge via
Figure 2. Thermal ellipsoid depiction of the cation of [(triphos)NiMe]-
OTf. H atoms and OTf- removed for clarity. Ellipsoids are shown at 30%
probability. Metrical parameters are provided in SI.
References
(1) (a) Ragsdale, S. W. Crit. ReV. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1991, 26, 261. (b)
The Bioinorganic Chemistry of Nickel; Lancaster, J. R., Ed.; VCH
Publishers: New York, 1988, Chapter 13-14. (c) Ragsdale, S. W. Crit.
ReV. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 39, 165.
1
formation of [Co]. The H NMR spectrum shows similar spectral
features to the reaction with protio MeCo, with the exception of
the lack of the Ni-Me signal at δ ) 0.34. The deuterium NMR
spectrum shows that quantitative transfer of the methyl group is
effected, with a single Ni2+-CD3 species produced, δ ) 0.2.
Independent synthesis of [(triphos)NiMe]OTf was achieved via
oxidative addition of MeOTf to a stoichiometric mixture of triphos
and Ni(COD)2 in toluene at -78 °C.15 The OTf salt was crystallized
by slow diffusion of Et2O into a saturated toluene solution at room
temperature (Figure 2). The spectroscopic data of [(triphos)NiMe]-
[OTf] are nearly identical to those of the product of methyl transfer
from MeCo to (triphos)Ni(PPh3). A solution of [(triphos)NiMe]-
[OTf] in CD3CN exhibits 31P NMR signals at δ ) 46.5 (d, 2P) and
98.0 (t, 1P) (JPP: 23 Hz). The Ni-Me signal is observed at δ )
0.04 with an identical coupling pattern. The very similar spectro-
scopic properties of [(triphos)NiMe][OTf] and the transmethylation
product, [(triphos)NiMe][Co], corroborate that methyl transfer has
been achieved (Scheme 1).
(2) (a) Doukov, T. I.; Iverson, T.; Seravalli, J.; Ragsdale, S. W.; Drennan, C.
L. Science 2002, 298, 567. (b) Darnault, C.; Volbeda, A.; Kim, E. J.;
Legrand, P.; Vernede, X.; Lindahl, P. A.; Fontecilla-Camps, J. C. Nat.
Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 271.
(3) Lindahl, P. A. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 9, 516.
(4) (a) Raybuck, S. A.; Bastian, N. R.; Zydowsky, L. D.; Kobayashi, K.; Floss,
H. G.; Orme-Johnson, W. H.; Walsh, C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
3171. (b) Lebertz, H.; Simon, H.; Courtney, L. F.; Benkovic, S. J.;
Zydowsky, L. D.; Lee, K.; Floss, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
3173. (c) Menon, S.; Ragsdale, S. W. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 5689. (d)
Menon, S.; Ragsdale, S. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 11513. (e) Tan, X.
S.; Sewell, C.; Lindahl, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6277.
(5) George, S. J.; Seravalli, J.; Ragsdale, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 13500.
(6) Seravalli, J.; Kumar, M.; Ragsdale, S. W. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 1807.
(7) Tan, X.; Surovtsev, I. V.; Lindahl, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
12331.
(8) The Organic Chemistry of Nickel: Vol. II, Organic Synthesis; Jolly, P.
W.; Wilke, G.; Academic Press: New York, 1974; Chapter 6. For
representative examples of CO insertion into Ni2+-alkyl bonds, see: (a)
Stoppioni, P.; Dapporto, P.; Sacconi, L. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 718. (b)
Carmona, E.; Gutie´rrez-Puebla, E.; Monge, A.; Mar´ın, J. M.; Paneque,
M.; Poveda, M. L. Organometallics 1989, 8, 967. (c) Schultz, C. S.;
DeSimone, J. M.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9172. For
examples of acyl-transfer to thiolates from Ni2+-acyls, see: (a) Stavropou-
los, P.; Muetterties, M. C.; Carrie, M.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 8485. (b) Tucci, G.; Holm, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 6489.
Next, we sought to test the hypothesis that CO ligation to Ni0
reduces the nucleophilicity, impeding the transmethylation reaction.
In the context of ACS catalysis, this implies an ordered binding of
Me+ followed by CO. The Ared-CO based mechanism necessarily
requires initial binding of CO.5 Darnault et al. have proposed a
(9) (a) Ram, M. S.; Riordan, C. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2365. (b)
Ram, M. S.; Riordan, C. G.; Yap, G. P. A.; Liable-Sands, L.; Rheingold,
A. L.; Marchaj, A.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1648.
(10) Abbreviations: dmgBF2 ) (difluoroboryl)dimethylglyoximato; tmc )
1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane; OTf- ) trifluo-
mechanism that proceeds through a tetrahedral Ni0 -CO inter-
P
mediate.2b An alternative mechanism requires that a coordinatively
unsaturated Ni0P attacks methylcob(III)alamin prior to CO binding.3
To evaluate these proposals, (triphos)NiCO16 was reacted with
MeCo in CD3CN/C6D6. After 24 h at room temperature, there was
no evidence for formation of [(triphos)NiMe]+. Approximately 10%
of (triphos)NiCO had decomposed, along with concomitant forma-
tion of [Co] (see Supporting Information for details). In stark
contrast, (triphos)Ni(PPh3) was methylated quantitatively in ∼1 h
under similar conditions. These striking differences in reactivity
provide chemical precedent in support of the hypothesis that Me
binds before CO in ACS catalysis.
romethanesulfonate; triphos
phosphine.
) bis(2-diphenylphosphinoethyl)phenyl-
(11) (a) Lai, C.-H.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Darensbourg, M. Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2390. (b) Golden, M. L.; Rampesad, M. V.; Reibenspies,
J. H.; Darensbourg, M. Y. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1824.
(12) King, R. B.; Cloyd, J. C., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 1550.
(13) (a) Schrauzer, G. N.; Windgassen, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 3738.
(b) Schrauzer, G. N.; Windgassen, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
1999.
(14) (a) Sacconi, L.; Dapporto, P.; Stoppioni, P.; Innocenti, P.; Benelli, C. Inorg.
Chem. 1977, 16, 1669. (b) Bach, I.; Goddard, R.; Kopiske, C.; Seevogel,
K.; Porschke, K.-R. Organometallics 1999, 18, 10. (c) Hienicke, J.; He,
M.; Dal, A.; Klein, H.-F.; Hetche, O.; Keim, W.; Flo¨rke, U.; Haupt, H.-J.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 3, 431. (d) Liang, L.-C.; Chien, P.-S.; Lin,
J.-M.; Huang, M.-H.; Huang, Y.-L.; Liao, J.-H. Organometallics 2006,
25, 1399.
We have shown that MeCo can quantitatively methylate a Ni0
complex, (triphos)Ni(PPh3). Electrochemical experiments suggest
that this reaction does not take place via electron transfer. The
potential of the Ni+/0 couple of (triphos)Ni(PPh3) (-100 mV vs
NHE) is too positive to reduce MeCo (-1.1 V vs NHE). Therefore,
we propose that this transformation takes place via an SN2
mechanism. This small molecule model reaction suggests that the
(15) The complex [(triphos)NiMe][BPh4] has been reported. It was prepared
by reaction of [(triphos)NiCl][BPh4] with methyl Grignard reagents.
Mealli, C.; Peruzzini, M.; Stoppioni, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 192,
437. See also Henderson, R. A.; Oglieve, K. E. Chem. Commun. 1999,
2271.
(16) Hou, H.; Rheingold, A. L.; Kubiak, C. P. Organometallics 2005, 24, 231.
JA072063O
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 30, 2007 9287