Z.-L. You, Q.-Z. Jiao, S.-Y. Niu, J.-Y. Chi
half of the molecule, with the other half generated by the
¯
inversion (1) symmetry. Each asymmetric unit is a dinuclear
copper(II) complex moiety, within which the Cu atoms are
connected by three bridging groups: one phenolate O atom,
one µ1,1-N3 ligand, and one acetate ligand. The two asym-
metric units are further linked through another two µ1,1-N3
ligands, forming a tetranuclear copper(II) complex. Each
of the symmetry related two outermost Cu atoms is five-
coordinated by one Schiff base ligand, one bridging azide
ligand, and one bridging acetate ligand, forming a square
pyramidal coordination. The basal plane of the square pyr-
amidal coordination for the outermost Cu atom is defined
by the two N atoms and one phenolate O atom of L and
one O atom of the bridging acetate ligand. The apical posi-
tion is occupied by one terminal N atom of the bridging
azide ligand. Each of the symmetry related two central Cu
atoms is five-coordinated by one phenolate O atom, one
acetate ligand, and three bridging azide ligands, forming a
square pyramidal coordination. The basal plane of the
square pyramidal coordination for the central Cu atom is
defined by the three terminal N atoms from the three bridg-
ing azide ligands and one O atom of the bridging acetate
ligand. The apical position is occupied by the phenolate O
atom of L. Each azide ligand in the asymmetric unit bridges
adjacent copper(II) ions through basal-apical linkage mode,
while the azide ligands located between the symmetry units
bridges the central copper(II) ions only through the basal
linkage mode. The apical Cu-N and Cu-O bond lengths are
much longer than usual. The other bond lengths and angles
are within normal values. The Cu···Cu distances are found
Figure 4 The crystal packing of 2, viewed along the a axis.
cedure, only with different copper(II) salts, viz. copper(II)
nitrate for 1 and copper(II) acetate for 2. The different
anions of the copper(II) salts used in the preparation of
the complexes can severely influence the structures of the
final products.
˚
˚
to be 3.066(2) A for Cu1 and Cu2 and 3.072(2) A for Cu2
and Cu2A, respectively. In the crystal structure, molecules
are stacked along the b axis, with no short intermolecular
contacts (Figure 4).
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (20571037).
I.r. spectra
Complexes 1 and 2 show strong absorption bands at 2054
and 2072 cmϪ1, respectively, consistent with the presence of
azide ligands in the structures. The lower frequency of the
stretching vibration for the azide ligands in 1 than that in
2 may be attributed to the highly asymmetrical nature of
the azide bridges in 1 [22]. The bands corresponding to the
azomethine (CϭN) groups in the complexes appear at 1612
and 1617 cmϪ1 for 1 and 2, respectively [23]. Complex 2
exhibits the typical acetate vibrations νasym(CO2) at
1531 cmϪ1 and νsym(CO2) at 1443 cmϪ1. While for 1, there
are no vibrations for the nitrate groups, indicating that they
were not participate in the coordination.
References
[1] H. Abourahma, B. Moulton, V. Kravtsov, M. J. Zaworotko, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9990.
[2] S. R. Batten, R. Robson, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1558; An-
gew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1460.
[3] S. Konar, P. S. Mukherjee, E. Zangrando, F. Lloret, N. R.
Chaudhuri, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1631; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 1561.
[4] Z.-L. You, H.-L. Zhu, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 632, 140.
[5] P. S. Mukherjee, T. K. Maji, G. Mostafa, W. Hibbs, N. R.
Chaudhuri, New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 760.
[6] P. S. Mukherjee, S. Dalai, G. Mostafa, T.-H. Lu, E. Rentschler,
N. R. Chaudhuri, New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 1203.
Conclusions
[7] Y. Xie, Q. Liu, H. Jiang, C. Du, X. Xu, M. Yu, Y. Zhu, New
J. Chem. 2002, 26, 176.
It is evident from the above discussion that we have success-
fully synthesized two novel azide-bridged copper(II) com-
plexes, [CuL(µ1,1-N3)]n (1) and [Cu4L2(CH3COO)2(µ1,1-N3)4]
(2), with different coordination modes using the same NNO
donor Schiff base ligand under the same synthetic pro-
[8] M. Monfort, I. Resino, M. S. El Fallah, J. Ribas, X. Solans,
M. Font-Bardia, H. Stoeckli-Evans, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 280.
[9] F. Meyer, H. Pritzkow, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2001, 4, 305.
[10] M.-L. Tong, S. Kitagawa, H.-C. Changa, M. Ohbaa, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 2004, 418.
2484
2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 2481Ϫ2485