2664
RSTAKYAN et al.
b. The reaction was performed similarly. The pro-
Scheme 2.
ducts were extracted with butanol, and 15 mL of
pyridine was added to capture the 4-(chloromethyl)
derivative. The resulting quaternary salt was filtered
off. After removal of butyl alcohol, the residue
crystallized. The crystals were filtered off and washed
with petroleum ether to yield methane-4,4'-diylbis-
(3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole) 3 (5.8 g, 33%).
After removal of petroleum ether, 3.2 g (17%) of
oxydimethane-4,4'-diylbis(3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1H-
pyrazole 4 (viscous liquid, nD20 1.5485) was isolated.
IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 1100 (CH2OCH2), 1540 (ring).
1Н NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6), δ, ppm (J, Hz): 2.21 s
(6Н, 3-CH3), 2.30 s (6H, 5-CH3), 4.26 s (4H, О(CH2)2),
7.28–7.47 m (10H, 2C6H5).
Cl
CH2O
HCl
N
+
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ph
7 (20%)
Ph
Ph
Ph
6
8 (25%)
(chloromethyl)-1H-pyrazole 7 and methanediylbispyra-
zole 8 (Scheme 2).
Since all the above reactions proceeded via
carbocation A formation, the stabilizing effect of
substituents [2] as well as the substrate nucleophilicity
affected the reaction route.
Nucleophilicity of 1,3,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrazole was
somewhat higher compared with that of 3,5-dimethyl-
1-phenyl- (1) and 3(5)-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole
(6); therefore, bispyrazolylmethane formation was the
predominant reaction pathway.
Hydroxymethylation of 3(5)-methyl-1-phenyl-
1Н-pyrazole 6 was carried out similarly. 4-Chloro-
methyl-3(5)-methyl-1-phenyl-4-chloromethyl-1Н-
pyrazole (7). Yield 4.1 g (20%), bp 130–135°С
(1 mmHg), n2D0 1.5835. IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 1530
(ring). 1Н NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6), δ, ppm (J, Hz):
2.20 s (3Н, 3-CH3), 2.32 s (3H, 5-CH3), 4.28 s (2H,
CH2Cl), 7.19 s (1H, H3), 7.30 s (1H, H5), 7.40 m (5H,
C6H5). Found, %: С 63.49; Н 5.85; Cl 17.4; N 13.2.
С11Н11ClN2. Calculated, %: С 63.92; Н 5.32; Cl 17.19;
N 13.59.
To conclude, increasing the number of methyl
substituents in the pyrazole ring prevented chloro-
methylation reaction, and the presence of phenyl
substituents had the opposite effect.
Hydroxymethylation of 3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-
1H-pyrazole (1). a. A mixture of 17.1 g (0.1 mol) of
3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole 1, 3 g of para-
formaldehyde, and 50 mL of conc. HCl was refluxed
during 1.5 h. The reaction mixture was neutralized
with NaOH solution. The reaction products were
extracted with butanol. The extract was dried over
MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was distilled in
vacuum to give 3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-4-chloro-
methyl-1H-pyrazole 5 in yield of 2.2 g (10%), bp 140°С
(1 mmHg), n2D0 1.5844. IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 1540
(ring). 1Н NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6), δ, ppm (J, Hz):
2.21 s (3Н, 3-CH3), 2.36 s (3H, 5-CH3), 4.61 s (2H,
CH2Cl), 7.42 m (5H, C6H5). Found, %: С 65.81; Н
5.44; Cl 16.35; N 12.24. С12Н13ClN2. Calculated, %: С
65.30; Н 5.89; Cl 16.09; N 12.69.
Bis[3(5)-methyl-1-phenylpyrazol-4-yl]methane
(8). Yield 4.0 g (25%), bp 245–250°С (1 mmHg),
viscous liquid, nD20 1.5428. IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 1580
(ring). 1Н NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6), δ, ppm (J, Hz):
1.98 s (6Н, 3-CH3), 2.0 s (6H, 5-CH3), 3.31 s (2H,
CH2), 7.21 s (1H, H3), 7.31 s (1H, H5), 7.45 m (10H,
2C6H5). Found, %: С 76.99; Н 6.48; N 17.31.
С21Н20N4. Calculated, %: С 76.82; Н 6.09; N 17.07.
IR spectra were obtained with a Nexus Thermo
Nicolet spectrometer. 1Н NMR spectra were registered
using a Varian Mercury instrument (300 MHz).
REFERENCES
On top of that, methane-4,4'-diylbis(3,5-dimethyl-
1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole) 3 was isolated with 60% yield
(10.6 g), bp 260°С (1 mmHg), mp 118°C (water–
1. Grandberg, I.I., Vasina, L.G., and Kost, A.N., Zh.
Obshch. Khim., 1960, vol. 30, no. 10, p. 3324.
1
acetone). IR spectrum, ν, cm–1: 1550 (ring). Н NMR
2. Bratenko, M.K., Chernyuk, I.N., and Vovk, M.B., Russ.
J. Org. Khim., 1997, vol. 33, no. 9, p. 1368.
spectrum (DMSO-d6), δ, ppm (J, Hz): 2.1 s (6Н, 3-
CH3), 2.23 s (6H, 5-CH3), 3.52 s (2H, CH2), 7.27–7.46
m (10H, C6H5). Found, %: С 77.21; Н 6.96; N 15.38.
С23Н24N4. Calculated, %: С 77.52; Н 6.74; N 15.73.
3. Attaryan, H.S., Gevorkyan, A.A., Antanosyan, S.K., and
Matsoyan, S.G., Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2007, vol. 77,
no. 6, p. 1139. DOI: 10.1134/S1070363207060345.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 85 No. 11 2015