Communications
erosion of the enantioselectivity was, however, observed
available cinchona alkaloid catalysts and a latent source of
HF.High enantioselectivities of up to 92% were obtained
under mild, neutral, and metal-free conditions.The method-
ology reported in this study adds to the repertoires of
asymmetric catalytic protonation, organocatalyzed reactions,
and of reactions that can be catalyzed by cinchona alkaloid
derivatives, in particular those building on the enantioselec-
tive activation of silicon-based nucleophiles by a cinchonium
fluoride ion.Further investigations of this innovative organo-
catalytic approach, including exploration of new chiral
tertiary amines, a detailed mechanism, and expanded sub-
strate scope, are underway.
when this ratio was increased to 4:1 (Table 2, entry 12).[10]
Interestingly, whereas benzoyl fluoride afforded tetralone 3a
in 78% ee, a serious diminution of the enantioselectivity was
evident with benzoic anhydride, which furnished tetralone 3a
with only 45% ee (Table 2, entries 6 and 13).The superiority
of benzoyl fluoride over benzoic anhydride in regard to chiral
induction illustrated that the nature of the counteranion in the
catalytic active species 1 f-HX (XÀ = FÀ, PhCOOÀ) is an
important parameter in this organocatalytic approach.
With this optimized catalytic process in hand (Table 2,
entry 11), the reaction scope was investigated using various
silyl enolates 2b–j (Table 3).We were pleased to find that silyl
enolates 2a–j afforded the corresponding tetralones 3a–j with
Experimental Section
Typical procedure for enantioselective protonation of silyl enolate
2a: A solution of 1 f (73 mg, 0.085 mmol) in DMF (0.5 mL), EtOH
(0.05 mL, 0.89 mmol), and benzoyl fluoride (110 mg, 0.89 mmol) were
Table 3: Reaction scope: Enantioselective organocatalytic protonation of
various silyl enol ether 2a–i by means of (DHQ)2AQN (1 f).[a]
added successively to
a solution of silyl enolate 2a (0.197 g,
0.85 mmol) in dry DMF (1.2 mL). The solution was stirred at room
temperature until all the starting material had completely disap-
peared (monitored by GC/MS).The solution was diluted with Et O
2
(10 mL), washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL), and the
aqueous solution was extracted with Et2O (3 10 mL).The combined
organic layers were washed with saturated brine (3 25 mL) and
dried (MgSO4).After evaporation of the solvent under vacuum, the
residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (Et2O/
cyclohexane 3:97) to afford the pure tetralone 3a, which was analyzed
by chiral HPLC.
Entry Silyl enolates 2
Yield[%] [b] ee [%][c] Configuration[d]
1
2
3
2a: n=2, R1 =Me, R2 =H 88
81
78
85
S
S
R
2b: n=2, R1 =Et, R2 =H 70
2c: n=2, R1 =Bn, R2 =H 84
2d: n=2, R1 =
4
91
74
nd[f]
Received: April 17, 2007
Revised: June 19, 2007
Published online: August 9, 2007
5
6
2e: n=2, R1 =Me,
R2 =OMe
98
81
nd
nd
2 f: n=2, R1 =Bn,
R2 =OMe
86
92
Keywords: alkaloids · enantioselectivity · hydrogen fluoride ·
7
8
9
2g: n=1, R1 =Me, R2 =H 78
2h: n=1, R1 =Et, R2 =H 76
2i: n=1, R1 =Bn, R2 =H 78
2j
71
74
64
S
S
nd
.
ketones · organocatalysis
10
98
30
S
[1] a) L.Duhamel, C. R. Acad. Sci. 1976, 282, 125; b) L.Duhamel,
J.C.Plaquevent, Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 2285; c) L.Duha-
mel, J.C.Plaquevent, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 7415.
[2] For reviews on enantioselective protonation, see a) L.Duhamel,
P.Duhamel, J.C.Plaquevent, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15,
3653; b) C.Fehr, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2726; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2566.
[3] For catalytic enantioselective protonation, see a) C.Fehr, I.
Stempf, J.Galindo, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 1093; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1044; b) C.Fehr, J.Galindo,
Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 1967; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1994, 33, 1888; c) A.Yanagisawa, T.Kikuchi, T.Watanabe, T.
Kuribayashi, H.Yamamoto, Synlett 1995, 372; d) E.Vedejs,
A.W.Kruger, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2792; e) Y.Ymashita, Y.
Emura, K.Odashima, K.Koga, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 209;
f) K.Mitsuhashi, R.Ito, T.Arai, A.Yanagisawa, Org. Lett. 2006,
95
58[e]
[a] Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was carried out in DMF(2 mL) at
room temperature for 12 h with silyl enol ether 2 (1 mmol), EtOH
(1.05 mmol), PhCOF (1.05 mmol), and 1 f (10 mol%). [b] Yieldof
isolatedproduct. [c] Determinedby HPLC, see the Supporting Informa-
tion. [d] Assigned by comparison with literature data. [e] Reaction
conducted at À108C. [f] nd=not determined.
satisfactory to good enantioselectivities of up to 92% ee
(Table 3, entries 1–6).While still acceptable, somewhat lower
enantioselectivities ranging from 64% to 74% ee were
obtained in the indanone series from silyl enolates 2g–i
(Table 3, entries 7–9).The more reactive silyl enolate 2j
afforded the corresponding cyclohexanone 3j with a rather
modest 30% ee, which, however, could be significantly
improved by conducting the reaction at À108C (Table 3,
entry 10).In all cases, ketones 3a–i were isolated in excellent
yields (70–98%).
8, 1721; g) K.Ishihara, M.Kaneeda, H.Yamamoto,
J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11179; h) K.Ishihara, S.Nakamura, M.
Kaneeda, H.Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12854;
i) M.Sugiura, T.Nakai, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2462; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2366; j) S.Nakamura, M.
Kaneeda, K.Ishihara, H.Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 8120; k) K.Ishihara, D.Nakashima, Y.Hiraiwa, H.
Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 24; l) A.Yanagisawa,
T.Touge, T.Arai, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 1570; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1546.
In summary, we have developed the first organocatalytic
enantioselective protonation of silyl enolates by using readily
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7090 –7093