Scope of the Suzuki-Miyaura Aminoethylation Reaction
moreover can be executed in a one-pot fashion. However,
it has some limitations as well. The procedure works well
with aryl and alkenyl iodides, but the corresponding bromides
generally require 1.5 equiv of the organoborane reagent. In
addition, the aminoethylating reagent prepared in situ by
hydroboration of the corresponding vinyl carbamate is
air-sensitive and cannot be conveniently isolated and stored.
While highly desirable within the context of a total synthesis,
this in situ strategy is perhaps not ideal for reaction optimization
on novel substrates and is not readily applicable to diversity-
oriented synthesis or efforts in parallel synthesis.
The development of a new Suzuki-Miyaura approach that
makes use of the more stable organotrifluoroborates would be
a good complement to the strategy pioneered and developed
by Overman. The nature of these boron reagents also makes
them an attractive alternative to the classical boronic acids or
boronate esters. The organotrifluoroborates are crystalline
compounds that are indefinitely stable to moisture and air.8 Their
monomeric form, coupled with their lower tendency to pro-
todeboronate as compared to boronic acids,9 permits the use of
stoichiometric amounts of these nucleophiles. We recently
reported an efficient and convenient synthesis of an important
class of tertiary phenethylamines through the Suzuki-Miyaura
cross-coupling reaction using â-aminoethyltrifluoroborates.10 To
expand the scope of this procedure, it appeared desirable to be
able to prepare phenethylamines containing the equivalent of a
primary amine. Herein, we disclose the results obtained from
the preparation of several potassium â-aminoethyltrifluorobo-
rates and their coupling with a wide variety of aryl halides and
triflates.
can be envisioned because many vinylcarbamates containing
various protecting groups are available.12
With these compounds in hand, Suzuki cross-coupling
reactions with a variety of aryl electrophiles were attempted.
The first halide partner studied was the electron-poor 4-bro-
mobenzonitrile 2a. On the basis of the optimized conditions
reported for the cross-coupling of the 9-vinylcarbazole-derived
potassium aminoethyltrifluoroborate and aryl bromides,10 we
first conducted the reaction in the presence of PdCl2(dppf)‚CH2-
Cl2 (5 mol %) using Cs2CO3 as a base and a mixture of toluene/
H2O as the solvent system. Under these conditions, a hetero-
geneous mixture was formed that, over time, eventually gave
rise to two homogeneous phases. These conditions allowed the
formation of the cross-coupled product 3a in a yield of 75%.
This promising result led us to test the generality of the method
by attempting the reaction on various electron-poor aryl
bromides containing diverse functional groups. The results
obtained are summarized in Table 1.
All electron-poor aryl electrophiles gave rise to the corre-
sponding cross-coupled products in good to excellent yields.
The use of the aryl bromides, iodides, or triflates (entry 7) did
not affect the efficiency of the reaction. As expected, the
coupling reaction tolerates a wide variety of functional groups
such as nitrile, halide, aldehyde, ketone, and ester and also
permits the use of nitro-containing derivatives. This last result
underscores an advantage of organotrifluoroborates over clas-
sical organoboron reagents such as alkyl 9-BBNs, where some
reduction of the nitro group can be observed during the cross-
coupling process.13 Reaction of the Cbz-protected organotri-
fluoroborate with electron-poor aryl electrophiles was proven
efficient even when only a slight excess of the organoboron
substrate is used (entry 7). The reaction also scaled up efficiently
to 3.5 mmol of potassium â-aminoethyltrifluoroborate, providing
nearly identical yields.
Results and Discussion
The current study began with the preparation of potassium
â-aminoethyltrifluoroborates using an adaptation of Overman’s
procedure.6,7 Thus, the desired N-vinyl carbamates6 were
hydroborated using the Snieckus hydroborating reagent (i-PP2-
BH),11 and the resulting organoborane intermediates were treated
with an aqueous solution of KHF2 (eq 1). The potassium
â-aminoethyltrifluoroborates produced in this way were isolated
in good yields and can be stored on the benchtop indefinitely
without any detectable degradation.
We next expanded the scope of this method using the Cbz-
protected trifluoroborate with various electron-rich aryl bro-
mides. Initial experiments (Table 2, entries 1 and 2) showed
that the conditions previously developed failed to give the
desired coupled compounds in satisfactory yields. These results
prompted us to choose another protocol. On the basis of a
successful procedure utilizing the Buchwald ligands,10,14 the
combination of 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 and 10 mol % of RuPhos
(Figure 2) was chosen as the catalytic system, and this offered
greatly improved yields for the coupling of 1-bromo-2,4-
dimethoxybenzene 4a (entry 1). These reactions generally
proceeded more efficiently if they were conducted at 95 °C.
Several electron-rich aryl electrophiles were coupled in good
yields using this procedure, and even the use of sterically
hindered electrophiles such as 2-bromomesitylene 4h did not
affect the efficiency of the reaction. However, when an aryl
bromide containing an amino group was used, only a moderate
yield (46%) was obtained (entry 7). Under the standard
conditions utilized, the reaction was incomplete, and several
byproducts were formed as well.
After optimization, the reaction could reliably be used to
prepare at least 5 g of the organotrifluoroborate without
compromising the yield of the reaction. The preparation of a
broader variety of these potassium â-aminoethyltrifluoroborates
To investigate the method further, the array of electrophiles
was expanded to heteroaromatic bromides (Table 3).
(8) For reviews of organotrifluoroborate salts, see: (a) Molander, G. A.;
Figueroa, R. Aldrichimica Acta 2005, 38, 49-56. (b) Darses, S.; Geneˆt,
J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 4313-4327. (c) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275-286. (d) Stefani, H. A.; Cella, R.; Vieira,
A. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3623-3658.
(9) Molander, G. A.; Biolatto, B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4302-4314.
(10) Molander, G. A.; Vargas, F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 203-206.
(11) Definition: i-PP2BH ) di(isopropylprenyl)borane. Kalini, A. V.;
Scherer, S.; Snieckus, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3399-
3404.
(12) (a) Carpino, L. A.; Tsao, J.-H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1978,
358-359. (b) Hart, R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1957, 66, 229-242.
(13) Oh-e, T.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Synlett 1990, 4, 221-223.
(14) (a) Milne, J. E.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
13028-13209. (b) Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685-4696.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 22, 2007 8423