complished by chloromethylenation13 and a subsequent
Fritsch-Buttenberg-Wiechell14 rearrangement to afford the
alkyne 14.15 The double bond was then cleaved chemose-
lectively by ozonolysis followed by a reductive workup16 to
provide a primary alcohol which was protected as a TBS
ether. The trisubstituted C12/C13 double bond was estab-
lished next. For this purpose, the terminal triple bond was
lithiated and treated with isopropyl chloroformate to provide
the alkynoate 15.
5-thiol (PT-SH) as the nucleophile and a subsequent Mo-
(VI)-catalyzed oxidation21 of the intermediate sulfide. Uti-
lizing the robust and reliable procedure reported by
Kocienski,22 the sulfone 7 was deprotonated with potassium
bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS) and treated with the crude
aldehyde 5 to afford the (12E,14E)-configured diene 4.23 The
R,â-unsaturated aldehyde 5 had been prepared from the R,â-
unsaturated ester 16 by a two-step redox sequence and was
used without further purification.24
Subsequent methylcupration of 15 in the presence of
superstoichiometric amounts of copper(I) bromide and me-
thylmagnesium bromide provided the E-configured R,â-
unsaturated ester 16.17-19 In accordance with a report by
Williams,19 we found that the presence of the sterically
demanding isopropyl ester and the bulky TBS protecting
group at C11 in combination with a slow warming process
prior to protic quench was essential for a very high E/Z
diastereoselectivity. The synthesis of the sulfone 7 and the
fragment coupling to provide the C8-C20 building block 4
is outlined in Scheme 3.
At this point, we had established an enantioselective
synthetic access to the C8-C20 building block 4 featuring
a longest linear sequence of 14 steps from the allyl vinyl
ether (Z,Z)-9 with an overall yield of 28%. To substantiate
the feasibility of our synthetic strategy toward CC (3), we
set out to prepare the γ-lactone in 17 from the protected diol
4 in the presence of the potentially sensitive diene moiety
(Scheme 3). Relying on a more conventional, stepwise line
of events, we first chemoselectively cleaved the primary TBS
ether in 4 to afford a primary alcohol which was oxidized
to the corresponding carboxylic acid by a two-step proce-
dure.12,25 Subsequent treatment of the acid with HF in
pyridine26 without an excess of pyridine deprotected the
secondary alcohol and induced lactonization to afford the
desired C8-C20 segment 17 of CC (3).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the C8-C20 Segment
In summary, we have demonstrated the utility of the
catalytic asymmetric Claisen rearrangement (CAC) in natural
product synthesis.27 The CAC provides scalable access to
the R-keto ester 6 as a single stereoisomer, thereby paving
the way for an efficient synthetic approach to the C8-C20
building block 4. Further work aimed at the completion of
the synthesis and, thereby, the elucidation of the relative and
absolute configuration of curvicollide C (3) is well underway
and will be reported in due course.
(15) The Ohira-Bestmann procedure failed to provide the desired alkyne
14; see: (a) Ohira, S. Synth. Commun. 1989, 19, 561-564. (b) Mu¨ller, S.;
Liepold, B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J. Synlett 1996, 521-522.
(16) Witkop, B.; Patrick, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3855-
3860.
(17) NOE studies on both double bond isomers support the assignment
of the double bond configuration. See the Supporting Information for details.
(18) (a) Corey, E. J.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969,
91, 1851-1852. (b) Siddall, J. B.; Biskup, M.; Fried, J. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1969, 91, 1853-1854. For a mechanistic study, see: (c) Nilsson, K.;
Andersson, T.; Ullenius, C.; Gerold, A.; Krause, N. Chem.sEur. J. 1998,
4, 2051-2058.
(19) Williams, D. R.; Fromhold, M. G.; Earley, J. D. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
2721-2724.
(20) Mitsunobu, O.; Yamada, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1967, 40, 2380-
2382.
(21) Schultz, H. S.; Freyermuth, H. B.; Buc, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1963,
28, 1140-1142.
The known alcohol 83 was converted into the sulfone 7
by a Mitsunobu reaction20 employing 1-phenyl-1H-tetrazole-
(22) (a) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett
1998, 26-28. (b) Blakemore, P. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002,
2563-2585.
3
(8) Brown, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4100-4102.
(9) Oikawa, Y.; Yoshioka, T.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982,
23, 885-888.
(10) Ko¨rner, M.; Schu¨rmann, M.; Preut, H.; Hiersemann, M. Acta
Crystallogr. 2007, E63, o3012.
(11) Corey, E. J.; Venkateswarlu, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6190-
6191.
(23) The JHH-based configurational analysis and NOE studies support
the assignment of the E-configuration to the newly generated C13/C14
double bond. See the Supporting Information for details.
(24) For MnO2-mediated oxidation, see: Gritter, R. J.; Wallace, T. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 1051-1056.
(25) Bal, B. S.; Childers, W. E.; Pinnick, H. W. Tetrahedron 1981, 37,
2091-2096.
(12) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4156.
(b) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-7287.
(13) Seyferth, D.; Grim, S. O.; Read, T. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83,
1617-1620.
(26) Nicolaou, K. C.; Seitz, S. P.; Pavia, M. R.; Petasis, N. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1979, 44, 4011-4013.
(27) For previous applications, see: (a) Pollex, A.; Hiersemann, M. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 5705-5708. (b) Wang, Q.; Millet, A.; Hiersemann, M. Synlett
2007, 1683-1686.
(14) Knorr, R. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 3795-3850.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 24, 2007
4981