Organic Letters
Letter
alkenylation has been reported,9 no substrate has been
demonstrated capable of concurrently initiating both γ-
C(sp3)−H alkylation and alkenylation via a palladium catalytic
system. Following our previous report on temperature-
switched arylation of C(sp3)−H and C(sp2)−H and catalytic
indole manipulation,10 herein we report an acid/base-
modulated selective alkylation and alkenylation of remote γ-
C(sp3)−H bond (Scheme 1c). Here, 7-azaindole was used as
the N,N′-bidentate DG under a palladium catalytic system.
Moreover, γ-C(sp3)−H alkylation was realized with the
assistance of benzoic acid, while γ-C(sp3)−H alkenylation
was realized with the assistance of the organic base 1,4-
diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) under otherwise the
same reaction conditions. A wide range of acrylates with
various alkyl chains and substituted benzene rings were tested
for these transformations, as well as α,β-unsaturated ketones or
acrylates with natural product units as the olefin coupling
partner. The synthetic utility of this protocol was further
investigated for structurally diverse alkanes from the alkylated
and alkenylated products. Experimental studies were per-
formed to further elucidate the underlying selective reaction
mechanism.
a,b
Scheme 2. Scope of for γ-C(sp3)−H Alkylation
We began our reaction investigations with N-neopentyl-1H-
pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine-1-carboxamide (1a) and methyl acryl-
ate (2a) under the Pd(OAc)2 catalytic system with Ag2CO3 as
an additive in the presence of acids or bases (see the
ature, various acids and bases as well as their amount were
tested. The results showed that 100 °C with 3 equiv. of
benzoic acid and 30 °C with 3 equiv. of triethylenediamine
(DABCO) were proved to be the most favorable conditions for
alkylation and alkenylation reactions, respectively.
With the optimal acid and base reaction conditions
established, we evaluated the substrate scope of C(sp3)−H
alkylation products (Scheme 2). The results showed that this
reaction could tolerate a wide range of acrylates with different
lengths of alkyl chains (2a−2d), cyclohexyl derivatives (2e,
2f), phenyl-substituted alkyl chains (2g−2k), and substituted
benzenes (2l−2t). The linear or cyclo-alkane coupled acrylates
produced similarly moderate yields of the alkylation products
(3b−3f). A clear trend was observed for 3g−3k: the longer the
alkyl chain between the phenyl group and the oxygen atom, the
lower the yield of the alkylated product 3, ranging from 61 to
82%. The acrylates with the same substituents on the para-
position of benzenes (3m, 3o) showed higher conversion rates
than those with ortho- (3s, 3t) or meta-substituents (3q, 3r).
The electron-donating groups (3m, 3n) at the phenyl para-
position was preferred to the electron-withdrawing groups (3o,
3p). The relatively deficient behaviors of 3s and 3t with ortho-
methyl and chloro group might be due to their steric hindrance
against intermediate complex formation.
a
Conditions: 0.2 mmol of 1a, 0.5 mmol of 2a, 0.02 mmol of
Pd(OAc)2, 0.6 mmol of Ag2CO3, 0.6 mmol of acid, 1 mL of HFIP,
100 °C reaction temperature, and 36 h reaction time. Isolated yields.
b
produced relatively lower yields (4m−4o). However, acrylates
with a substituted benzene ring containing an electron-
withdrawing group failed to yield the product. Interestingly,
α,β-unsaturated ketones could also form corresponding
alkenylation products (4p−4r).
Given the appealing results so far, we applied the C(sp3)−H
alkenylation system to natural products (Scheme 3). Acrylates
with cholesterol (4s), fenchyl alcohol (4t), citronellol (4u),
isopulegol (4v), perillyl alcohol (4w), and L-menthol (4w)
were all well tolerated. These results demonstrate the
successful application of this catalytic protocol to perform
late-stage C(sp3)−H alkenylation of hydroxyl-containing
natural products.
The scope of C(sp3)−H alkenylation was also investigated
(Scheme 3). Acrylates with different alkyl chains successfully
reacted with 1a to give alkenylation products in moderate to
good isolated yields (4a−4e). The results showed that the
longer chain length led to less yields of products (4b−4e), and
the transformation rate on the branched alkyl substrates (4c,
4e) was slightly lower than the corresponding unbranched
alkylsubstrates (4b, 4d). The cyclohexyl and adamantyl group
further reduced the reaction productivity (4f and 4g). The
phenyl alkyl substituents also successfully produced moderate
to good isolated yields of products (4h−4l), whereas the
substituted benzenes with an electron-donating group
The manipulation of aliphatic chains is a major pursuit in
organic chemistry. To showcase the synthetic utility of the
C(sp3)−H alkylation and alkenylation reactions, scale-up (2.0
mmol) reactions of 1a and 2a were conducted. Products 3a
and 4a were selectively obtained with 55 and 62% yields,
respectively, confirming the catalytic system efficiency
(Scheme 4a). Moreover, the DG deprotection of 3a and 4a
was accompanied by hydrolysis to obtain free acid. In the
presence of an acid group, the benzoyl protection of the free
amine was conducted for easy purification and analysis. Hence,
the removal of DG from 3a led to amine hexanoate derivative
6, with 63% yield, whereas the newly formed amine after 4a
3467
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3466−3471