688
A. Carita, A. C. B. Burtoloso / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 686–688
2. For recent synthesis of icetexane diterpenoids, see: (a) Sengupta, S.; Drew, M. G.
B.; Achari, B.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Banerjee, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7694–
7700; (b) Padwa, A.; Boonsombat, J.; Rashatasakhon, P.; Willis, J. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 3725–3727; (c) Simmons, E. M.; Sarpong, R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2883–2886; (d)
Majetich, G.; Li, Y.; Zou, G. Heterocycles 2007, 73, 217–225; (e) Majetich, G.; Yu,
J.; Li, Y. Heterocycles 2007, 73, 227–235; (f) Srikrishna, A.; Beeraiah, B.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2587–2597; (g) Simmons, E. M.; Yen, J. R.;
Sarpong, R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2705–2708; (h) Majetich, G.; Yu, J. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 89–91; (i) Majetich, G.; Zou, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 81–83; (j) Majetich, G.;
Zou, G.; Grove, J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 85–87; (k) Padwa, A.; Chughtai, M. J.;
Boonsombat, J.; Rashatasakhon, P. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4758; (l) Martinez-
Solorio, D.; Jennings, M. P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 189–192; (m) Majetich, G.; Grove,
J. L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2904–2907.
the same Marson-type cyclization conditions directly on aldehyde
15 and achieve the synthesis of a brussonol analogue in a tandem
fashion. To verify that, TMS-protected aldehyde 15 was prepared in
two steps from epoxide 9, using our epoxide-opening approach,
and submitted to the presence of SnCl4 or BF3ÁEt2O. To our delight,
in the presence of these Lewis acids, TMS-protected aldehyde 15
was directly converted in 90–95% yield into brussonol analogue
16 in a possible series of cascade events: (i) removal of TMS; (ii)
cyclization to its ketal; (iii) formation of the oxonium ion; and
(iv) Marson-type Friedel–Crafts cyclization to 16 (Scheme 3).
As a conclusion, after a thorough investigation, the epoxide ring-
opening strategy (key step of the present strategy) was accom-
plished, furnishing 13 in 45–55% yields. With the present strategy,
cyclized product 16 was easily prepared in a short sequence of reac-
tions, employingtheconditions(Marson-typecyclization)described
by Solorio and Jennings. The use of other epoxides and metallated
aromatic rings, and the application of this epoxide ring-opening
strategy in the synthesis of other icetexane diterpenes are now being
investigated and will be reported in due course.
3. During the same time we were working on this project, a similar approach was
investigated with no success.2l
4. (a) Manning, P. T.; Misko, T. P. U. S. patent 2005025620, 2005.; (b) Howard, W.
L.; Lorette, N. B. Org. Synth. 1962, 42, 34–35.
5. Corey, E. J.; Chaykovsky, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1353.
6. Weijers, C. A. G. M.; Meeuwse, P.; Herpers, R. L. J. M.; Franssen, M. C. R.;
Sudhoelter, E. J. R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6639–6646.
7. Caldwell, J. J.; Craig, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2631–2634.
8. Nishizawa, M.; Iwamoto, Y.; Takao, H.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 1685–1687.
9. Experimental procedure for the synthesis of adduct 13: To a solution of 1,2-
dimethoxybenzene (1.1 mL, 9.0 mmol) in 30 mL of dry tetrahydrofuran (THF), at
0 °C, was added 6.7 mL (9.0 mmol) of a 1.35 M solution of BuLi in hexanes. After
stirring the solution for 2.5 h at room temperature, 1.4 mL (9.0 mmol) of
tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) was added at once and the solution
heated to reflux. Next, 456.0 mg (3.0 mmol) of epoxide 9 in 3.0 mL of dry THF
was added and the solution stirred for 1 h under these conditions. The reaction
was then cooled to room temperature and 30 mL of saturated NH4Cl aqueous
solution was added to quench the reaction, followed by extraction with EtOAc
(3 Â 20 mL). Next, the organic phase was dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and
evaporated to furnish a crude yellow oil. Column chromatography purification
(1:4/EtOAc–hexanes) provided a mixture of tertiary alcohol 13 and remaining
1,2-dimethoxybenzene. Removal of 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (50 °C at 0.1 mmHg
or doing a second purification in 3:2/CH2Cl2–hexanes, furnished 478.0 mg (55%)
of pure alcohol 13. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d = 1.00–1.80 (3 m, 9H), 2.05 (m,
1H), 2.54 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (m, 1H), 2.91 (s, 1H, OH), 3.27 (d, J = 13.5 Hz,
1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 4.90–5.20 (m, 2H), 5.70–6.00 (m, 1H), 6.65–7.05
(m, 3H); 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): d = 21.8, 25.3, 27.4, 34.1, 36.8, 41.6, 45.5,
55.7, 60.3, 73.5, 110.8, 115.4, 123.8, 124.4, 131.8, 138.7, 147.1, 152.7; IR (neat,
cmÀ1): 3494, 2930, 2854, 1637, 1583, 1477, 1269, 1083, 750, 609; MS-ESI: 313.4
(M+Na), 273.4, 231.4; MS-APCI: 273.1 (M+1ÀH2O), 231.1.
Acknowledgments
We thank FAPESP (Research Supporting Foundation of the State
of São Paulo) for financial support and CNPq for the fellowship to A.
Carita. We also thank Professor Daniel Cardoso and Professor Ro-
berto Berlinck (IQSC, USP) for the mass spectrometer analysis.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (NMR (1H NMR and 13C NMR) and MS spectra
for compounds 9, 11, 13, 15 and 16) associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. Simmons, E. M.; Sarpong, R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 1195–1217.