1044
D. Basavaiah et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17 (2006) 1041–1044
Table 4. Recyclable ability of catalyst I in the asymmetric reduction of
phenacyl bromide 4a
Chemistry as a ‘Center for Advanced Studies in Chemistry’
and providing some instrumental facilities. K.V.R. and
B.S.R. thank CSIR (New Delhi), for their research
fellowships.
Number of runs
Enantiomeric purity (%)a 5a
1
2
3
4
91
89
88
88
References
a Determined by HPLC analysis using the chiral column, Chiralcel-OD-H.
1. Basavaiah, D.; Venkateswara Rao, K.; Sekhara Reddy, B.
2. Basavaiah, D.; Chandrashekar, V.; Das, U.; Jayapal Reddy,
G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 3955–3962.
3. Basavaiah, D.; Jayapal Reddy, G.; Venkateswara Rao, K.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1881–1888.
4. Basavaiah, D.; Jayapal Reddy, G.; Chandrashekar, V.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 47–52.
5. Basavaiah, D.; Jayapal Reddy, G.; Chandrashekar, V.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1125–1128.
6. Basavaiah, D.; Jayapal Reddy, G.; Chandrashekar, V.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 685–689.
7. (2S)-2-Anilinomethylpyrrolidine was prepared following the
literature procedure. (Iriuchijima, S. Synthesis 1978, 684–
685).
In order to examine (rule out) the possible auto-catalytic
potential of the alkoxyborane, generated in the reaction
medium, in inducing the chirality in the asymmetric reduc-
tion of phenacyl bromide, we have conducted the reduction
of phenacyl bromide with BH3ÆSMe2 (1 equiv and also with
2 equiv) under the influence of (S)-2-bromo-1-phenyletha-
nol (1 equiv, 84% ee) (for 30 and 15 min, respectively). In
both cases, we obtained (S)-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol in
42% enantiomeric purity (i.e., enantiomeric purity of the
alcohol obtained by the reduction is ꢀ0%). These experi-
ments clearly indicate that there is no auto-catalysis, and
(S)-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol (as boron species) has no
role in the chiral induction process. Thus, these experi-
ments clearly demonstrate the recyclable potential of the
diamine as the chiral catalytic source in the asymmetric
reduction processes.
8. Asami, M.; Sato, S.; Watanabe, H. Chem. Lett. 2000, 990–
991.
9. Sato, S.; Watanabe, H.; Asami, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 4329–4340.
10. Asymmetric reduction of phenacyl bromide 4a: Synthesis of
(S)-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol 5a: Representative procedure:
To a stirred solution of (2S)-2-anilinomethylpyrrolidine 2
(0.02 mM, 0.4 mL, 0.05 M solution in toluene) in toluene
(4 mL) was added BH3ÆSMe2 (1 mM, 1 mL, 1 M solution in
toluene) at room temperature and the reaction mixture heated
under reflux for 15 min. A solution of phenacyl bromide 4a
(1 mM, 199 mg), in toluene (2 mL), was then added slowly,
dropwise and heated under reflux for a further 15 min. The
reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and
quenched with MeOH. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure and the residue thus obtained was purified
by column chromatography (silica gel, 5% ethyl acetate in
hexanes) to provide the desired (S)-2-bromo-1-phenylethanol
5a in 82% (165 mg) yield as a colourless oil.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a simple, convenient and
practical methodology for the borane-mediated asymmetric
reduction of prochiral ketones employing (2S)-2-anilino-
methylpyrrolidine 2 as an efficient in situ recyclable chiral
catalytic source in refluxing toluene, thus providing the sec-
ondary alcohols with high enantiomeric purities. Although
our methodology did not provide 100% enantioselectivities,
this study has shown the hidden potential of chiral diamines
in directing the enantioselective processes in the borane-
mediated asymmetric reduction of prochiral ketones at high
temperature, and also emphasizes the need for the design
of appropriate chiral diamines for achieving 100% enantio-
selectivities. Work towards the design of different chiral
diamines in achieving complete enantioselectivities is
currently underway in our laboratory.
11. Imuta, M.; Kawai, K. I.; Ziffer, H. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
3352–3355.
12. Hiratake, J.; Inagaki, M.; Nishioka, T.; Oda, J. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 6130–6133.
13. Prasad, K. R. K.; Joshi, N. N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996,
7, 3147–3152.
14. Nakamura, K.; Matsuda, T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8957–
8964.
Acknowledgements
15. Homann, M. J.; Vail, R. B.; Previte, E.; Tamarez, M.;
Morgan, B.; Dodds, D. R.; Zaks, A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
789–797.
16. Cruz, A.; Geniz, E.; Contreras, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998, 9, 3991–3996.
We thank CSIR (New Delhi), for funding this project.
We thank the UGC (New Delhi), for recognizing our
University of Hyderabad as ‘University with Potential for
Excellence (UPE)’ and also recognizing the School of