On the Mechanism of TiCl4-Mediated Phenolic Formylation
with Ar and cooled with an ice bath. Then, TiCl4 (800 μL,
7.30 mmol in anhydrous CH2Cl2) was added dropwise. The reac-
tion mixture was left to react for 1 h. Since the reaction occurs even
without adding a base, the proton extraction in anhydrous CH2Cl2
is performed by one molecule of 3,5-dimethoxyphenol acting as a
base to form complex 3 in the present experimental set up. After-
wards, a solution of different equivalents of TEMPO in anhydrous
CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added by syringe to the solution and the mix-
ture left to react for a further 45 min. The reaction was quenched
by the addition of a saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (10 mL)
neously, this research has provided theoretical and experi-
mental evidence of diradical and triradical intermediates
that lead to new and interesting active reagents for general
use. It is found that the valence tautomerism is essential
to understand the different nature of the active species for
possible nucleophilic or radical processes in all the pro-
posed mechanisms. In this sense, the implication of these
kinds of diradical complexes in this and related reactions is
expected to be of fundamental significance in organic and
bioorganic chemistry. In particular, the formation of prod- and the mixture was left to stand for 2 h. The organic layer was
ucts such as lignines[17] or reactivity of phenolic deriva-
separated and washed with 0.1 n HCl solution (3ϫ 50 mL) and
brine (3ϫ 50 mL). The organic layer was dried with Na2SO4, fil-
tives[18] may occur through diradical mechanisms similar to
tered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The
the ones reported in the present study.
crude reaction mixtures were analyzed by HPLC with 5% MeCN
for 2 min and from 5 to 95% MeCN in 10 min. Products 7 and 9
were obtained in different proportions according to the equivalents
Experimental Section
of TEMPO used, as shown in Table 1.
EPR Experiments
Table 1. Amounts of TEMPO used in this study and yields of 7
and 9 obtained under these conditions.
Experiment 1: Following the conventional procedure for the
formylation reaction, a solution of 3,5-dimethoxyphenol (231.0 mg,
1.50 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was stirred at 0 °C.
Then, TiCl4 (170 μL, 1.55 mmol) was added dropwise, then the
mixture was left for a period of 30 min. Afterwards, anhydrous
Et2O (170 μL, 1.62 mmol) [instead of dichloromethyl methyl ether]
was added and after 30 min, 400 μL of the mixture, which presum-
ably contains the blocked intermediate (compound 3 in Scheme 3),
was introduced into an EPR tube for characterization. The com-
plete procedure was carried out under Ar to avoid contamination
by O2. The mixture was prepared the day before and kept at –80 °C
in the EPR tube under Ar. The reference sample used as a blank in
the EPR experiment contained 3,5-dimethoxyphenol in anhydrous
CH2Cl2 in the same concentration as the experiment mixture
(0.15 m). The EPR spectra in solution at 4 K shows a clear |Δms| =
1 signal at ≈ 3350 G (g ≈ 2.000) without fine structure and the spin
forbidden half field |Δms| = 2 signal at ≈ 3350 G (g ≈ 4.392). The
observation of the half field signal at low temperature and the de-
crease in intensity of the observed signals with temperature suggest
that the diradicals formed in the solution have a triplet ground
state. However, these signals are almost undistinguishable from the
background signal above 100 K in this experiment. This fact
suggests that the pre-equilibria suggested by the theoretical model
described in Figure 1 (panel a) start to play a role since the signal
in experiment 2 is observable even at ambient temperature.
TEMPO ([g]/[mmol])
TEMPO [equiv.] 7 [%][a] 9 [%][a]
[b]
0.608/3.9
1.267/8.1
2.534/16.2
3.042/19.5
1.2
2.5
5.0
6.0
quant.
35
–
65
82
quant.
18
–
[b]
[a] Determined by integration of chromatographic areas. [b]Not de-
tected.
From 6 equiv. of TEMPO the reaction stops progressing and shows
the same chromatographic profile, only with product 9. No varia-
tion of the temperature in the reactions improved the ratio of the
desired products. Conversely, a lower yield was obtained due to
what we believe is the stability of the titanium complex with in-
creasing temperature.
A notable result was obtained when a solution of product 7
(500 mg, 3.25 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) purged with Ar
and cooled with an ice bath was mixed with one equivalent of
TEMPO in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) added by syringe to the solu-
tion. The mixture did not show any change or reaction for 45 min
since in the analysis only the initial reactants and no other product
could be seen. This negative result is a clear indication that only
the radical reaction proceeds in the presence of TiCl4 in front of
other possible chemical equilibria such as H·or H+ extraction by
TEMPO on phenols.
Experiment 2: A solution of 3,5-dimethoxyphenol (500.0 mg,
3.25 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and under an argon at-
mosphere was stirred at 0 °C. Then, TiCl4 (800 μL, 7.30 mmol) was
added by syringe and the mixture was left for a period of 30 min.
The mixture was introduced into an EPR tube for characterization
also under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was prepared and
analyzed at the same time. The EPR spectra in solution shows a
clear |Δms| = 1 signal even at 300 K at ≈ 3350 G. To justify the EPR
signal observed in this experiment we propose what we believe is
the most plausible explanation, an intermediate coordination con-
sisting of two phenols bonded with TiCl4 in an open shell singlet
or triplet state. In the case of experiment 1, the competing pre-
equilibria between TiCl4 with phenol and/or ether molecules (neu-
tral, anions and diradical tautomers described in Figure 1) is
responsible for the rapid decay of the intensity of the EPR signal
above 50 K.
Products 7 and 9 were isolated by flash chromatography and char-
acterized as follows:
2-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenoxy)-3,5-dimethoxyphenol (7): White solid.
TLC: Rf = 0.77 (AcOEt). HPLC-MS: (X-Terra MS C18, H2O/
MeCN from 95:5 to 0:100 over 11 min) tR = 7.3 min, m/z = 307.1
[M + H]+. HRMS (ESI): calcd for (C16H19O6) 307.1182; found
1
307.1175 [M + H]+. H NMR (400 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 6.04 (s,
1 H, Ar-H), 6.03 (s, 2 H, Ar-H), 6.01 (s, 1 H, Ar-H), 5.93 (s, 1 H,
Ar-H), 3.66 (s, 3 H), 3.52 (s, 3 H), 3.51 (s, 6 H) ppm. UV/Vis
(methanol): λmax = 243.6 nm.
2-(3,5-Dimethoxyphenoxy)-3,5-dimethoxy-4-[(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-
pipe-ridin-1-yl)oxy]phenol (9): Brown oil. TLC: Rf = 0.71 (AcOEt).
HPLC-MS: (X-Terra MS C18, H2O/MeCN from 95:5 to 0:100 over
11 min) tR = 9.1 min, m/z = 478.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI): calcd
for (C25H37NO8) 478.2442; found 478.2439 [M + H]+. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ = 6.17 (s, 1 H, Ar-H), 6.08 (s, 1 H, Ar-
TEMPO Experiments:
A solution of 3,5-dimethoxyphenol
(500 mg, 3.25 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was purged
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2111–2118
© 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
2115