di-[12]aneN ligands (5–9). The obtained results revealed that
5 J. Weston, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2151.
3
6
7
R. Wolfenden and M. J. Snider, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 938.
J. J. Zhang, Y. Shao, L. Wei, Y. Li, X. Sheng, F. Liu and G. Y. Lu, Sci.
China, Ser. B: Chem., 2009, 52, 402.
N-methylation of the [12]aneN backbone greatly reduced the
3
cooperative behavior among the mononuclear Zn(II) complexes,
a common phenomenon in a reduced dielectric alcohol medium.
Such cooperative action would result in the synergetic effect and
significant catalytic activity. The activities of the dinuclear zinc(II)
8 C. Liu and L. Wang, Dalton Trans., 2009, 227.
F. Mancin and P. Tecilla, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 800.
9
10 R. S. Brown, Z.-L. Lu, C. T. Liu, W. Y. Tsang, D. R. Edwards and
A. A. Neverov, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2010, 23, 1.
11 D. E. Wilcox, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2435.
complexes for the di-[12]aneN ligands containing di-N-methyl
3
(
8) and tetra-N-methyl (9) substituents for cleaving HPNPP have
12 A. A. Neverov, Z.-L. Lu, C. I. Maxwell, M. F. Mohamed, C. J. White,
J. S. W. Tsang and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 16398.
been impaired by 91-fold and 63 000-fold, respectively. The
reduction of the activity in the cleavage of MPNPP follows a
similar trend. The kinetic results indicate that the steric effects
derived directly from the coordinating nitrogen donors greatly
reduced the binding activation process and accumulated expo-
nentially. Nevertheless, some zinc(II) complexes of N-methylated
mono- and di-[12]aneN ligands still provide significant catalytic
efficiency in methanol. Dinuclear complex Zn : 8 can accelerate
the cleavage of each phosphate by a factor of 10
tive to the background reactions at concentration of 1 mM and
self-buffered conditions. The synergetic effects between the two
13 Z.-L. Lu, C. T. Liu, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 11642.
14 S. E. Bunn, C. T. Liu, Z.-L. Lu, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 16238.
1
1
1
1
5 C. T. Liu, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 16711.
6 C. T. Liu, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 13870.
7 A. A. Neverov, C. T. Liu, S. E. Bunn, D. Edwards, C. J. White,
S. A. Melnychuk and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6639.
8 D. R. Edwards, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2009, 131, 368.
3
2
9
–10
folds rela-
19 M. F. Mohamed, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Inorg. Chem., 2009,
8, 11425.
4
[
12]aneN units of Zn -8 are 561 and 340 folds, respectively, for
3 2
2
0 W. Y. Tsang, D. R. Edwards, S. A. Melnychuk, C. T. Liu, C. Liu,
A. A. Neverov, N. H. Williams and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2009, 131, 4159.
the catalytic cleavage of the two phosphates. Results from this
work have provided the insight into the steric effects on reactions
catalyzed by artificial nucleases and further confirmed that a
combination of the cooperative effect between two metal ions
and a solvent effect can lead to significant catalytic activities for
the cleavage of phosphate diesters.
21 D. R. Edwards, W.-Y. Tsang, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 822.
22 J. S. W. Tsang, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 1559.
23 A. J. Kirby and M. Younas, J. Chem. Soc. B, 1970, 1165.
24 R. W. Alder, R. W. Mowlam, D. J. Vachon and G. R. Weisman, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 507.
2
2
5 J. Notni, H. Goerls and E. Anders, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 1444.
6 R. W. Alder, D. Colclough and R. W. Mowlam, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991,
Acknowledgements
3
2, 7755.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance from
the Program for New Century Excellent Talents at Universities
2
7 For the designation of pHin non-aqueous solvents we use the forms rec-
ommended by the IUPAC, Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature.
Definitive Rules 1997 3rd edn, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. 1998. If one cali-
brates the measuring electrode with aqueous buffers and then measures
the pH of an aqueous buffer solution, the term
(NCET-08-0054), the Ministry of Education of China; Nature
Science Foundation of China (20972019); the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities (2009SC-1), Beijing
Municipal Commission of Education, and the National Student
Innovation Training Program (SITP) for undergraduates.
w
w
pH is used; if the elec-
trode is calibrated in water and the ‘pH’ of the neat buffered methanol
solution then measured, the term
s
w
pH is used; and if the electrode is cali-
brated in the same solvent and the ‘pH’ reading is made, then the term
s
s
−16.77
pH is used. Since the autoprotolysis constant of methanol is 10
,
s
neutral
s
pH is 8.4
2
2
8 A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 3588.
9 J. Zan, H. Yan, Z.-f. Guo and Z.-L. Lu, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2010,
13, 1054.
Notes and references
1
Y. Aiba, J. Sumaoka and M. Komiyama, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40,
657.
5
30 Z.-F. Guo, H. Yan, Z.-F. Li and Z.-L. Lu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9,
6788.
31 M. F. Mohamed and R. S. Brown, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 8471.
32 M. F. Mohamed, I. Sanchez-Lombardo, A. A. Neverov and R. S. Brown,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 631.
2
3
4
H. Loennberg, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 1687.
B. Gyurcsik and A. Czene, Future Med. Chem., 2011, 3, 1935.
J. R. Morrow, T. L. Amyes and J. P. Richard, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41,
5
39.
7720 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 7714–7720
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012