30
K.G. Reddy et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 180 (2013) 26–30
rendering it suitable for electroanalysis by enzyme inhibition method.
The proposed detection method is simple, cost effective, eco-friendly
and can be safely used for the determination of methyl parathion in
environmental samples.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to the University Grants Commission,
New Delhi Government of India for providing the financial assistance
through major research project F. no. 39 744/2010 (SR).
References
[1] S.R. Rodrigues, C. Caldeira, B.B. Castro, F. Goncalves, B. Nunes, S.C. Antunes, Pesticide
Biochemistry and Physiology 99 (2011) 181–188.
[2] S. Lacorte, C. Molina, D. Barcelo, Analytica Chimica Acta 28 (1993) 71–84.
[3] Y. Pico, A.J. Louter, J.J. Vreuls, U.A. Brinkman, The Analyst 119 (1994) 2025–2031.
[4] E. Ballesteros, M.J. Parrado, Journal of Chromatography A 1029 (2004) 267–273.
[5] S. Lacorte, D. Barcelo, Journal of Chromatography A 725 (1996) 85–92.
[6] D. Barcelo, M.C. Hennion, Trace Determination of Pesticides and their Degradation
Products in Water, second ed. Elsevier Science B.V., Netherlands, 1997.
[7] V. Pichon, M.C. Hennion, Journal of Chromatography A 665 (1994) 269–281.
[8] M.A. Sirvent, A. Merkoci, S. Alegret, Analytica Chimica Acta 442 (2001) 35–44.
[9] M.P. Marco, D. Barcelo, Measurement Science and Technology 7 (1996) 1547–1562.
[10] K. Anitha, S. Venkata Mohan, S. Jayarama Reddy, Biosensors and Bioelectronics
20 (2004) 848–856.
Fig. 10. The effect of incubation time at various inhibitor concentrations on the ac-
tivity of mobilized Candida Rugosa Lipase enzyme in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.0
for methyl parathion: (a) 10 ppb, (b) 20 ppb, (c) 30 ppb, (d) 40 ppb, (e) 50 ppb,
(f) 60 ppb, and (g) 70 ppb.
[11] F. Kartal, A. Kilinc, S. Timur, International Journal of Environmental and Analytical
Chemistry 87 (2007) 715–722.
[12] W. Wei, R. Wang, L. Nie, S. Yao, Instrumentation Science and Technology 25 (1997)
157–167.
[13] Y. Ling, B. Unnikrishnan, S.M. Chen, International Journal of Electrochemical
Science 6 (2011) 3902–3912.
[14] J. Mathiyarasu, J. Joseph, K.L.N. Phani, V. Yegnaraman, Indian Journal of Chemical
Technology 11 (2004) 797–803.
[15] S. Reddy, B.E. Kumara Swamy, B.N. Chandrashekar, S. Chitravathi, H. Jayadevappa,
Analytical & Bioanalytical Electrochemistry 4 (2012) 186–196.
[16] M.F.S. Teixeira, M.F. Bergamini, C.M.P. Marques, N. Bocchi, Talanta 63 (2004)
1083–1088.
[17] S. Reddy, B.E. Kumara Swamy, U. Chandra, B.S. Sherigara, H. Jayadevappa, Interna-
tional Journal of Electrochemical Science 5 (2010) 10–17.
Table 3
The various parameters determined for methyl parathion.
Sl. no
Parameters
Methyl parathion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Incubation time (min)
Response time
Linear range (ppb)
Correlation coefficient
Standard deviation
Detection limit (DL) (ppb)
Quantification limit (QL) (ppb)
25 min
05 min
10–70
0.948
12.1607
26.32
87.72
[18] S. Reddy, B.E.K. Swamy, S. Aruna, M. Kumar, R. Shashanka, H. Jayadevappa, Chemical
Sensors 2 (2012) 1–7.
[19] G. Ozyilmaz, Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 56 (2009) 231–236.
[20] O. Gilbert, B.E. Kumara Swamy, U. Chandra, B.S. Sherigara, Journal of Electroana-
lytical Chemistry 636 (2009) 80–85.
[21] S. Reddy, B.E.K. Swamy, H. Jayadevappa, Electrochimica Acta 61 (2012) 78–86.
[22] A. Hildebrandt, J. Ribas, R. Bragos, J.L. Marty, M. Tresnchez, S. Lacorte, Talanta
75 (2008) 1208–1213.
[23] R.N. Hegde, B.E. Kumara Swamy, N.P. Shetti, S.T. Nandibewoor, Journal of Electro-
analytical Chemistry 635 (2009) 51–57.
[24] G. Madhavi, J. Damodar, S.K. Mohan, S.J. Reddy, Bulletin of Electrochemistry
10 (1998) 209–213.
4. Conclusions
The present study described the preparation of lipase based mobi-
lized electrochemical sensor within the electrochemical cell to deter-
mine the concentration of organophosphorus pesticides. This method
is based on the study of inhibition percentage of lipase enzyme activity.
Electroanalytical investigation of methyl parathion is achieved down to
10 ppb (correlation coefficient=0.948 and slope=1.3862) at pH 7.0.
The plot obtained with concentration of methyl parathion vs inhibition
percentage yields a straight line almost passing through the origin
[25] G. Madhavi, J. Damodar, S.K. Mohan, S.J. Reddy, Bulletin of Electrochemistry
15 (1999) 535–538.