rate determining step in the cleavage studies described below.
Binding of Th(1)4+ (15 mM) to diethyl phosphate (10 mM), pH
6.90, 0.10 M Hepes buffer at 22 °C, is complete within the 90
s it takes to record the 31P NMR spectrum. In comparison,
cleavage of RNA analog 3 by 15 mM Th(1)4+ in 0.10 M Hepes
at 22 °C has a half-life of 4.5 min.
phosphate diesters. In conclusion, we show here that it is
feasible to prepare a Th(IV) complex of a neutral macrocycle
which is highly resistant to dissociation in neutral aqueous
solutions and is active in the cleavage of phosphate diesters and
RNA. We demonstrate that the catalytic power of a tetravalent
cation can be harnessed in a macrocyclic complex.
We are grateful to the American Chemical Society Petroleum
Research Fund (34358-AC) and the National Science Founda-
tion (CHE-9986332) for support of this work.
Th(1)4+ promotes transesterification of the phosphate diester
3 to form the cyclic phosphate diester and 4-nitrophenylate as
determined by use of 31P NMR and UV–VIS spectroscopy.∑ At
pH 7.30, 37 °C with 1.00 mM complex and 0.100 mM 3, the
reaction exhibited good first-order kinetics in 3 for greater than
four half-lives. Transesterification of 3 is first-order in Th(1)4+
complex in the concentration range 0.60–2.00 mM with a
second-order rate constant of 0.65 M21 s21. Addition of 10%
EDTA (based on complex concentration) to reaction solutions
did not reduce the pseudo-first-order rate constant, suggesting
that the reaction is not catalyzed by a small amount of free
Th(IV) ion. Transesterification of 3 by Th(1)4+ is essentially
independent of pH in the pH range 5.0–7.9. Phosphate diester
cleavage by metal ion complexes is typically pH dependent
owing to the formation of metal hydroxide complexes.6,8–11
That cleavage of 3 by Th(1)3+ is not pH dependent suggests that
the speciation of the Th(IV) complex does not change in this pH
range. Pseudo-first-order rate constants for Th(1)4+ and analo-
gous Ln(III) complexes are listed in Table 1. Th(1)4+ is 40-times
more active than La(1)3+, the most active lanthanide complex in
the series. In addition, Th(1)4+ promotes cleavage of adenylic
acid oligomers more rapidly than does La(1)3+ under similar
conditions.
Notes and references
‡ Equimolar amounts of TCMC and Th(NO3)4 were heated to reflux in dry
methanol for 1.5 h. The methanol was removed and the complex was
isolated as a white solid in 43% yield following precipitation twice from a
methanol–diethyl ether mixture. Anal. Calc. for C20H42N12O17Th [Th(1)-
(Et2O)](NO3)4: C, 25.16; H, 4.43; N, 17.60. Found: C, 25.02; H, 4.38; N,
17.27. FAB MS: m/z 818 [Th(1)(NO3)3+]. The 13C NMR spectrum of
Th(1)4+ in D2O showed resonances at 52.5, 57.3, and 177.3 ppm assigned
to carbons of the ethylene moiety, methylene and carbonyl carbons,
respectively.
§ Only one major diastereomeric form of the complex is observed by 1H or
13C NMR spectroscopy. In contrast, Eu(1)3+ has two diastereomers present
in solution and solid state (see refs. 13 and 14).
¶ In the solid state, [La(1)(CF3SO3)(EtOH)](CF3SO3)2 is a ten-coordinate
complex with an unusual 1,5,4 geometry while [Eu(1)(H2O)](CF3SO3)3 is
a nine-coordinate complex with a monocapped distorted square antiprism
geometry.13
∑ The kinetics of transesterification of 3 were monitored by use of UV–VIS
spectroscopy. At pH values > 6.0, the production of 4-nitrophenylate was
monitored at 412 nm. At pH values < 6.0, the decrease in the absorbance of
3 at 300 nm was monitored.
How does Th(1)4+ promote RNA cleavage and why is the
complex more efficient than analogous Ln(1)3+ complexes?
Given that the ionic radii of Th(IV) and Eu(III) are nearly
identical, it is likely that Th(1)4+ is nine-coordinate with a single
site for the binding substrate, analogous to Eu(1)3+.13 Thus,
Th(1)4+ activates the phosphate diester to cleavage most
probably through interaction at a single coordination site. The
greater reactivity of the Th(IV) complex compared to its
lanthanide(III) analogs is attributed to the greater Lewis acidity
of the Th(IV) center as suggested by its strong interaction with
1 J. Sumaoka, Y. Azuma and M. Komiyama, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4,
205.
2 R. A. Moss and K. G. Ragunathan, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1871.
3 R. A. Moss and H. Morales-Rojas, Org. Lett., 1999, 11, 1791.
4 R. Ott and R. Krämer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1957.
5 T. Ihara, H. Shimura, K. Ohmori, H. Tsuji, J. Takeuchi and M. Takagi,
Chem. Lett., 1996, 687.
6 R. A. Moss, J. Zhang and K. Bracken, Chem. Commun, 1997, 1639.
7 K. Bracken, R. A. Moss and K. G. Ragunathan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 9323.
Table 1 Pseudo-first-order rate constants for cleavage of RNA and
phosphate diester 3 by thorium(IV) and lanthanide(III) complexes of 1 at
37 °C
8 B. N. Trawick, A. T. Daniher and J. K. Bashkin, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98,
939.
9 R. Haner and J. Hall, Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev., 1997, 7,
423.
10 J. R. Morrow, in Metal Ions in Biological Systems, ed. H. Sigel and A.
Sigel, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1996, vol. 33, pp. 561–592.
11 M. Komiyama, N. Takeda and H. Shigekawa, Chem. Commun., 1999,
1443.
12 D. A. Voss, Jr., Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo,
2000.
13 (a) S. Amin, J. R. Morrow, C. H. Lake and M. R. Churchill, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1994, 33, 773; (b) S. Amin, D. A. Voss, Jr., W. DeW.
Horrocks, Jr., C. H. Lake, M. R. Churchill and J. R. Morrow, Inorg.
Chem., 1995, 34, 3294.
14 S. Aime, A. Barge, J. I. Bruce, M. Botta, J. A. K. Howard, J. M.
Moloney, D. Parker, A. S. de Souza and M. Woods, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 5762.
Complex
Substratea,b,c
kobs/1024 s21
Th(1)4+
Th(1)4+
La(1)3+
La(1)3+
Eu(1)3+
Eu(1)3+
3
A10
3
A12–A18
3
A12–A18
7.5a
9.2
0.16
1.6
NRd
NRd
a For substrate 3 conditions were pH 7.3, 1.00 mM complex, 0.100 mM 3,
10 mM Hepes buffer, 100 mM NaNO3. b For A10 conditions were pH 7.4,
0.200 mM complex, 5 mM Hepes buffer, 0.013 mM A10 (adenosine
concentration). c For A12–A18 conditions were pH 7.6, 0.200 mM complex,
5 mM Hepes buffer, 0.08 mM A12–A18 (adenosine concentration).13 d No
cleavage observed under the conditions given above.13
15 A. Fratiello, R. E. Lee and R. E. Schuster, Inorg. Chem., 1970, 9,
391.
2510
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2509–2510
Typeset and printed by Black Bear Press Limited, Cambridge, England