3
182 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 10, 2002
Fife et al.
-
in the reaction, which is not typical of the nucleophilic
reactions of weakly basic amines.28 The effect of the
leaving group is large in the nucleophilic reactions of the
and OH catalyzed hydrolysis reactions are compared at
the same pH, then the enhancement in kobsd due to
general base catalysis will increase by a factor of 10 for
each decrease in pH of one unit at pH values above the
1
7,29
corresponding 2-aminomethylbenzoate esters (âlg ∼ 1.0)
and those of o-aminophenylacetate esters.30
a
pK of the general base. The enhancement of the observed
rate constant can therefore become quite large (10 -fold
5
in the case of III at pH 4). This is because of the decrease
-
in concentration of the fully ionized nucleophile (OH )
with decreasing pH.
Gen er a l Ba se Ca ta lysis. The reactions of II-IV
provide an excellent opportunity to assess the relative
advantages and disadvantages of general base mecha-
nisms in enzymatic reactions. General base catalysis
gives relatively small rate enhancements, but a precise
The amine nitrogen of II-IV is held rigidly quite close
to the carbonyl group carbon; AMl semiempirical calcula-
tions indicate with III and IV that the nonbonded
distances are 2.99 and 3.08 Å, respectively. Unlike other
8
steric alignment is not required. A nucleophilic mecha-
nism, on the other hand, can give large rate constants
at pH values near neutrality and is subject to further
apparent intramolecular general base catalyzed reac-
17,30
general acid-base catalysis.
At pH 7, phenyl 2-amino-
tions,1
0-15
there are no steric impediments to nucleophilic
methylbenzoate releases phenol 20 000-fold faster than
III. However, the steric fit is highly important in the
nucleophilic reactions. A steric situation comparable to
the formation of a five- or six-membered ring transition
state is very likely required in enzymatic nucleophilic
attack except the necessity of a four-membered ring
transition state. The energy of the hypothetical tetra-
hedral intermediate (VI) from the density functional or
ab initio calculations, is much higher than that of the
isomeric reactant (∆ ) +50.4 kcal/mol).31 The C-N-C
bond angle is 88.82° in VI.
33
reactions. Consequently, if a variety of structurally
dissimilar substrates are acted upon by a hydrolytic
enzyme, then a mechanism without rigid steric con-
straints would be advantageous. It is now clear that a
further point in favor of the general base mechanism is
the lack of dependence of the rate constants on the
leaving group (âlg = 0). As a consequence, a large group
of different substrates can be utilized without loss of
catalytic efficiency.
The difference in pH dependence for nucleophilic and
general base catalyzed reactions can lead to a significant
advantage of the general base mechanism at pH values
near or below neutrality. When the steric fit of an
intramolecular nucleophile to the carbonyl is very good,
the nucleophilic attack will be facile. The tetrahedral
intermediate should then be present at high concentra-
tion. Breakdown of the intermediate to products can be
rate determining and pH dependent; the cyclization of
Thus, the calculations indicate that nucleophilic attack
in II-IV would be energetically unfavorable and there-
fore unlikely; the transition state for nucleophilic attack
would necessarily lie much closer to the tetrahedral
intermediate than to reactants. In this case, the calcula-
tions support and help explain the conclusions derived
from the experimental data.
The rate enhancement provided by mechanism V can
be calculated by comparison with the rate constant for
the water reaction of the 4-substituted derivative or that
of the unsubstituted benzoate ester. In those reactions,
a water molecule very likely acts as a general base,
partially abstracting a proton from another water mol-
ecule as it attacks at the carbonyl. In bimolecular general
base catalyzed hydrolysis reactions, the Bronsted â
values usually range from 0.2 to 0.5.32 A small â implies
only moderate proton transfer from the water molecule
in the transition state. Thus, the moderate calculated
rate enhancement for intramolecular general base ca-
talysis in the hydrolysis of III (<100-fold) reflects the
facility of the comparison reaction and a small â coef-
ficient. A small â is consistent with a small rate enhance-
ment due to the basic group. Note, however, that if the
calculated kobsd values for the intramolecular general base
2
-aminomethylbenzoate esters proceeds with apparent
-
17,29
OH catalysis.
involving attack of an incipient hydroxide ion will be pH
independent at pH values greater than the pK of the
In contrast, a general base reaction
a
base catalyst. Consequently, at low pH values, a general
base mechanism can in fact give the largest rate. With
the present series of compounds, IV reacts faster than
trifluoroethyl 2-aminomethylbenzoate at pH < 5. The
mechanism for the latter ester cannot change to general
base catalysis at pH < 5 because of amine protonation
and the favorable nucleophilic attack that traps the
functional group free base in a tetrahedral intermediate
(eq 2).
(
28) J encks, W. P.; Gilchrist, M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
2
2
622. Blackburn, G. M.; J encks, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
638.
(
29) Fife, T. H.; DeMark, B. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
6
978.
(
(
30) Fife, T. H.; Duddy, N. W. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 74.
31) The ∆ values of the internal energies were similar employing
(33) In the deacylation of the p-nitrophenoxycarbonyl serine-195 acyl
R-chymotrypsin, the leaving group is p-nitrophenol. Histidine-57 acts
as a nucleophile, but the reaction is quite hindered, which is probably
the result of poor steric fit: Hutchins, J . E. C.; Fife, T. H. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1972, 94, 8848.
density functional pBP.DN* or 6-31G* ab initio calculations.
32) (a) J encks, W. P.; Carriuolo, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83,
743. (b) Fife, T. H.; McMahon, D. M. J . Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 3699.
(
1