TETRAHEDRON
LETTERS
Pergamon
Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 5465–5468
Efficient, selective deprotection of aromatic acetates catalyzed
ꢀ
by Amberlyst-15 or iodine
Biswanath Das,* Joydeep Banerjee, R. Ramu, Rammohan Pal, N. Ravindranath and C. Ramesh
Organic Chemistry Division-I, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India
Received 28 March 2003; revised 12 May 2003; accepted 22 May 2003
Abstract—Aromatic acetates were selectively deprotected in the presence of aliphatic acetates to the corresponding phenols in
excellent yields using Amberlyst-15 or iodine as catalysts in methanol at room temperature. The first catalyst can be recovered.
©
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Phenolic hydroxy groups are present in several bioac-
tive naturally occurring compounds, hence protection
and subsequent deprotection of this group is necessary
for multistep transformations and syntheses of these
We have recently discovered a simple process for facile
cleavage of aromatic acetates over a wide range of
functional groups in the presence of Amberlyst-15 or
iodine as catalysts in methanol. Several aromatic
acetates were selectively deprotected to the correspond-
ing phenols (Table 1) using these catalysts at room
temperature. The yields of the regenerated phenols were
typically excellent. Alkyl acetates were unaffected by
both catalysts under the present experimental condi-
tions. Ethers, esters and lactones also remained unaf-
fected. Amberlyst-15 showed similar activity towards
the deprotection of aromatic acetates containing elec-
tron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups but
iodine showed weak or no activity towards deprotec-
tion of aromatic acetates possessing electron-withdraw-
ing groups (except when in the presence of another
1
compounds. A routinely used method for the protec-
tion of the phenolic hydroxy group involves conversion
to the corresponding acetate which can be cleaved1
under acidic or basic conditions or by hydrogenolysis.
However, these deprotection methods may affect differ-
ent sensitive functional groups and selectivity is poor. A
limited number of methods exist for the selective depro-
tection of aromatic acetates in the presence of aliphatic
2
a
acetates (these include the use of specific micelles,
2
b
2c
2d
Zn–MeOH, cyclodextrin, metalloenzymes, metal
complexes, antibodies and NH OAc ). Although
2
e
2f
2g
4
these methods have certain applicabilities most have
associated drawbacks such as operational complexity,
harsh reaction conditions, use of costly and difficult to
obtain reagents, long reaction times and low yields. The
recovery of catalysts is also a problem. Recently natural
–
OAc group). Thus, p-nitrophenyl acetate (entry g) was
easily converted into p-nitrophenol (time 3.0 h, yield
7%) using Amberlyst-15 but was unaffected in the
8
presence of iodine. Amberlyst-15 also showed high
chemoselectivity for the cleavage of phenyl acetates
without affecting electron-withdrawing groups such as
an aldehyde, ketone, benzoate, N-acetyl and tosylate.
To demonstrate the selectivity, some intermolecular
experiments were also carried out. Thus, when a mix-
ture of p-methylphenyl acetate and phenylethyl acetate
in methanol (entry u) was treated with Amberlyst-15
and iodine separately, the first compound underwent
deprotection in each case to p-methylphenol, but the
second compound remained unchanged. However,
when the reaction was carried out with a mixture of
phenyl acetate and p-formylphenyl acetate (entry v) in
the presence of these two catalysts separately, both
compounds were deprotected with Amberlyst-15 but
only the first compound with iodine.
3
kaoline clay has been applied, however, the clay was
collected from a specific geographical region. Thus,
there is a need for suitable methods for selective depro-
tection of aromatic acetates which make use of readily
available catalysts and which work efficiently under
mild reaction conditions.
Keywords: aromatic acetates; deprotection; Amberlyst-15; iodine;
chemoselectivity.
ꢀ
Part 29 in the series, ‘Studies on Novel Synthetic Methodologies’.
*
0
040-4039/03/$ - see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01298-X