Nitration of Phenolic Compounds
COMMUNICATIONS
Experimental Section
Acknowledgements
We thank the State Key Project of Basic Research (Project 973)
No. G2000048007), Shanghai Municipal Committee of Science
General Remarks
(
and Technology, and the National Natural Science Foundation
of China for financial support (20025206, 203900502, and
Mp×s were obtained with a Yanagimoto micro melting point
apparatus and are uncorrected. H NMR spectra were record-
1
2
0272069).
ed on a Bruker AM-300 spectrometer for solutions in CDCl3
with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard; J values are
in Hz. All of the solid compounds reported in this paper gave
satisfactory C,H,N microanalyses with a Carlo-Erba 1106
analyzer. Mass spectra were recorded with an HP-5989 instru-
References and Notes
ment and HRMS was measured by a Finnigan MA mass
spectrometer. Organic solvents were dried by standard meth-
ods when necessary. Commercially obtained reagents were
used without further purification. All reactions were moni-
tored by TLC with Huanghai GF254silica gel coated plates.
The orientation of nitration was determined by NMR analysis.
Flash column chromatography was carried out using 200 ± 300
mesh silica gel.
[1] a) G. A. Olah, R. Malhotra, S. C. Narang, Nitration:
Methods and Mechanism, (Ed.: H. Feuer), VCH Publish-
ers, New York, 1989; b) C. K. Ingold, Structure and
nd
Mechanism in Organic Chemistry, 2 edn., Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1969; c) G. A.
Olah, S. J. Kuhn, in Friedel±Crafts and Related Reactions,
(
Ed.: G. A. Olah) Wiley-Interscience, New York, Vol. 2,
964.
2] J. T. Stewart, C. A. Janicki, Anal. Profiles Drug Subst.
987, 16, 119 ± 144.
3] L. Lunar, D. Sicilia, S. Rubio, D. Perez-Bendito, U.
Nickel, Water Res. 2000, 34, 1791 ± 1802.
1
[
[
[
1
General Procedure for the Nitration of Phenolic
Compounds
4] M. N. Desai, Indian J. Appl. Chem. 1970, 33, 277 ± 282.
KSF (500 mg) was put into aglass vessel and then the vessel was
flame-dried under reduced pressure. A solution of resorcinol
[5] a) G. A. Olah, S. C. Narang, J. A. Olah, K. Lammertsma,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 4487 ± 4494; b) M. J.
Thompson, P. J. Zeeger, Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 8787 ±
8790; c) S. C. Bisarya, S. K. Joshi, A. G. Holkar, Synth.
Commun. 1993, 8, 1125 ± 1137; d) J. A. R. Rodrigues,
A. P. De Oliveira Filho, P. J. S. Moran, R. Custodio,
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6733 ± 6738.
(
110 mg, 1.0 mmol) and bismuth nitrate (39 mg, 0.1 mmol ) in
THF (or other solvent, 5 mL) was added into the dried glass
vessel. Nitric acid (65%, 0.10 mL, 1.4mmol) was slowly added
dropwise and the mixture was stirred for 16 hours at room
temperature. After filtration, the catalyst was recovered and
the reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane
[
6] B. Gigante, A. O. Prazeres, M. J. Marcelo-Curto, A.
Cornelis, P. Laszlo, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3445 ± 3447.
7] a) H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, M. A. Zolfigol, Synth.
Commun. 1997, 19, 3301 ± 3311; b) N. Iranpoor, H.
Firouzabadi, M. A. Zolfigol, Synth. Commun. 1998, 15,
(
CH Cl ). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure
2 2
and the residue was purified by a silica gel column chromato-
graph (eluent: petroleum ether/EtOAc, 10/l) to give the
product as a yellow solid; yield: 108 mg (70%).
[
2
773 ± 2781.
[
8] A. V. Joshi, M. Baidoosi, S. Mukhopadhyay, Y. Sasson,
Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 95 ± 97.
[
9] a) H. Suzuki, T. Takeuchi, T. Mori, J. Org. Chem. 1996,
Recovery of the Employed Catalysts and the Reusing
Procedure
6
1, 5944 ± 5947; b) J. M. Riego, Z. Sedin, J. M. Zaldivar,
N. C. Marziano, C. Tortato, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
13 ± 516.
The catalyst can be easily recovered from the reaction mixture
just by filtration and reused for many times after it had been
activated by heating in an oven at 1208C. The recovered
catalyst was employed in the same manner as that described
above. After filtration, the catalyst was recovered and the
reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane
5
[
10] F. M. Herman et. al. The Encyclopedia of Polymer
Science and Engineering, Vol. II, pp. 601 ± 635, Wiley-
InterScience, New York, l988.
11] Z. Lysenko, L. C. Rand, (Sanford), U. S. Patent 4,982,001.
12] R. J. Schmitt, D. S. Ross, J. R. Hardee, J. F. Wolfe, J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 5568 ± 5569.
[
[
(
CH Cl ). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure
2 2
and the residue was purified by a silica gel column chromato-
graph (eluent: petroleum ether/EtOAc, 10/l) to give the
product as a yellow solid; yield: 110 mg (71%).
[
13] S. Susanta, F. B. Frederick, K. B. Bimal, Tetrahedron Lett.
2
000, 41, 8017 ± 8020; for more examples using mont-
morillonite KSF as the catalyst in organic synthesis,
please see: a) B. Labiad, D. Villemin, Synthesis 1989,
143 ± 144; b) W. G. Dauben, J. M. Cogen, V. Behar,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3241 ± 3244; c) J. S. Yadav,
B. V. S. Reddy, G. M. Kumar, Ch. V. S. R. Murthy, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2001, 42, 89 ± 91; d) H. M. S. Kumar, B. V. S.
Reddy, P. K. Mohanty, J. S. Yadav, Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 3619 ± 3622; e) H. M. S. Kumar, B. V. S. Reddy,
4
-Nitro-resorcinol (1): A yellow solid; yield: 170 mg (73%);
mp 117 ± 1198C, IR (KCl): n 1532, 1397 (NO ), 3354,
2
À1
1
1
(
8
255 cm (OH); H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz, TMS): d 6.47
3
1H, dd, J 9.2 Hz, 3.4Hz, Ar), 6.52 (1H, d, J 3.4Hz, Ar ),
.05 (1H, d, J 9.2 Hz, Ar), 10.97 (1H, s, ArOH); MS (EI): m/
z 155 (M , 47.40), 125 (M ± 30, 100), 97 (M ± 58, 94.90), 77
(
(
M ± 78, 6.77) 51 (M ± 104, 65.02); anal. calcd. for C H NO
6 5 4
%): C 46.46, H 3.25, N 9.03; found: C 46.48, H 3.44, N 9.02.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1197 ± 1202
asc.wiley-vch.de
¹ 2003 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1201