C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In summary, the presence of large concentrations of inert solutes
has only a modest effect on enzyme activitysless than an order of
magnitude reduction in kcat. Apparently, the catalytic process hardly
reacts to the large reduction in the concentration of water in the
model system. The enzyme probably retains its specific hydration
state, and consequently it is difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons
for the small reduction in kcat. It is noteworthy that the decline in
kcat is linear with increasing additive concentration. Comparison to
solvent polarity data and the nucleophilic reaction of the substrate
with TRIS indicate that this appears to be a medium effect on
enzyme chemistry and further attention should be paid to environ-
mental effects upon enzyme catalysis in vivo.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the NRSCC for financial
Figure 2. Variation of enzyme kinetic parameters with solute concentration
at 25 °C and pH 7.7. The solid lines are linear fits to kcat
support of this work.
.
Supporting Information Available: Eadie-Hofstee plots for
trypsin-catalyzed pNPOAc hydrolysis in the presence of NBAA. Plots
of pseudo-first-order rate constant against TRIS concentration for buffer-
catalyzed pNPOAc hydrolysis at different PEG concentrations (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Fersht, A. Enzyme Structure and Mechanism, 2nd ed.; Freeman: New
York, 1985. (b) Klibanov, A. M. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 97-101.
(c) Mesiano, A. J.; Beckman, E. J.; Russel, A. J. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99,
623-633.
(2) This corresponds to a water concentration in the region of 30-40 M. (a)
Cayley, S.; Lewis, B. A.; Guttman, H. J.; Record, M. T., Jr. J. Mol. Biol.
1991, 222, 281-300. (b) Neihardt, F. C.; Umbarger, H. E. Chemical
Composition of Escherischia coli. In Escherischia coli and Salmonella
typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology; American Society for
Microbiology: Washington, DC, 1987.
(3) Ellis, R. J. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26, 596-604.
(4) Ball, P. H2O: A Biography of Water; Phoenix: London, 2000.
(5) Verkman, A. S. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 27-33.
(6) Morar, A. S.; Wang, X.; Pielak G. J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 281-285.
(b) Rivas, G.; Fernandez, J. A.; Minton, A. P. Biochemistry 1999, 38,
9379-9388.
(7) Dzingeleski, G. D.; Wolfenden, R. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 9143-9147.
(8) Bell, G.; Janssen, A. E. M.; Halling, P. J. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1997,
20, 471-477.
(9) Mares-Guia, M.; Figueirdo, A. F. S. Biochemistry 1972, 11, 2091-2098.
(10) It should be noted that trypsin is an extracellular enzyme that operates in
similarly concentrated media.
(11) Analogous catalysis of the Kemp elimination has been observed: Holl-
felder, F.; Kirby, A. J.; Tawfik, D. S. Nature 1996, 383, 60-63.
(12) Matsushima, A.; Kodera, Y.; Hiroto, M.; Nishimura, H.; Inada, Y. J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzymol. 1996, 2, 1-17.
(13) Initial rates were obtained by linear regression of the first 2000 s of
absorbance/time data converted to p-nitrophenolate concentration using
the extinction coefficient of p-nitrophenol at the wavelength of maximum
absorption of the anion measured independently of the kinetic run in the
same buffer solution. Sample solutions containing the indicated solute
concentration and 7 µM trypsin, 40 mM TRIS buffer (pH 7.7), and 13
mM Ca2+ were preheated to 25 °C; to generate each data point 20, 30,
50, or 70 µL of p-nitrophenyl acetate stock solution in MeCN was then
injected.
Figure 3. Dependence of ET(30) and water activity17 on solute concentra-
tion at 25 °C.
It is inconceivable that PEG and NBAA have a common
noncompetitive binding site on the enzyme and unlikely that binding
of PEG and NBAA by trypsin at different sites remote from the
catalytic center accounts for the observed kinetics. A crowding-
induced change in enzyme conformation has previously been
proposed to account for lowering of enzyme activity,18 but unlike
PEG, NBAA is not a crowding agent. The observed kinetics must
therefore be attributable to an environmental effect on the enzyme,
the substrate, or both.
It is possible that the effect of the solute is limited to a
perturbation of the pKa of one or more catalytically important groups
on the enzyme. However, a study of the background nucleophilic
attack of TRIS on the substrate in the absence of enzyme19 revealed
an analogous linear variation of the (second-order) rate constant
with PEG concentration (not shown). Since isotopic substitution
experiments have shown that the solution phase nucleophilic and
chymotrypsin-catalyzed hydrolysis of pNPOAc proceed via ef-
fectively the same mechanism,20 we propose that in this system
the effect of the additive on solvent polarity is the dominant factor.
It appears therefore that the same effect of solvent polarity is
observed in both the enzyme-catalyzed and the solution-phase
reactions. This is reasonable since the active site of trypsin is
relatively exposed to solvent.21 The results presented here point to
a correlation between kcat and ET(30); however, there is insufficient
data to propose a direct link. We have observed similar trends in
a Diels-Alder reaction and an A1 acetal hydrolysis.22
(14) Hofstee, B. H. J. Nature 1959, 184, 1296-1298.
(15) Fersht, A. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science; Freeman: New
York, 1998.
(16) This probe is sensitive to both the polarity of the solvent system and its
hydrogen-bond donating character. Reichardt, C. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94,
2319-2358.
(17) Water activity was measured in an AquaLab Series 3 vapor pressure
osmometer. Curve fit is based on a modified Flory-Huggins equation.
(18) Lonhienne, T. G. A.; Winzor, D. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 9616-9622.
(19) The rate of the background TRIS-catalyzed reaction is small relative to
that of the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis.
(20) Hess, R. A.; Hengge, A. C.; Cleland, W. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 2703-2709.
(21) Nakasako, M. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289, 547-564.
(22) Asaad, N.; Engberts, J. B. F. N.; den Otter, M. J. Manuscript in preparation.
JA034298F
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 23, 2003 6875