Table 1. Oxidation of Cinnamaldehyde with NHCs
a
a
entry
conditions
CO2
N2
aira
1
2
dry, K2CO3 (2 equiv), DMSO
dry, K2CO3 (2 equiv), DMF
dry, t-BuOK ((2 equiv), DMF
dry, DBU (20 mol %), THFb
as shown in reaction scheme
0.1 M/3 days
8%
4%
3%
À
À
4%
8%
3
45%
20%
23%
27%
40%
1%
À
4
10%
14%
17%
14%
2%
11%e
5%
13%
57%
64%
32%
0%
À
5
6
7
0.5 M/3 days
8
without NHC precatalyst
triazolium cat. 4c (5 mol %)
thiazolium cat. 5d (5 mol %)
dry, MeOH (2 equiv)
9
15%f
2%
10
11
12
13
2%
64%
À
À
À
Figure 1. 1H NMR comparison in different atmospheres.
trans-azobenzene (1.0 equiv)
MeOH (2 equiv), azobenzene
21%
0%g
52%
0%h
À
a See Supporting Information for detailed conditions. Conversion to
cinnamic acid 2 was calculated from 1H NMR of crude mixtures.
b Purged with a slow stream of gas for 30 min. Hydrocinnamic acid
was the major product regardless of reaction atmopsheres. c 1,4-Di-
methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ium iodide (4, CAS No. 120317-69-3) was
hydrocinnamic acid via the known internal redox reaction
(entry 9).13 The increased formation of hydrocinnamic
acid under CO2 is likely due to the formation of carbonic
acid that serves as the proton source for β-protonation.
Thiamine, a thiazolium salt, did not give significant
amounts of any product (entry 10). Control experiments
and careful analysis of the reaction mixtures and products
excluded a Cannizzarro-type reaction14 as the origin of the
cinnamic acid.
The use of air as an oxidant in NHC-catalyzed oxida-
tions of electron-deficient aldehydes to acids and esters has
been previously reported by Yoshida using a slightly
different imidazolium catalyst.8 Their mechanistic propo-
sal invokes the formation of an acyl azolium, which under-
goes esterification or hydrolysis. This mechanism is con-
sistent with numerous reports of NHC-catalyzed oxidative
esterification of aldehydes with oxidants including azo-
benzene,15 diphenoquinone,16 and MnO2.17 To test if our
observations followed this proposal, we conducted the
reactionunder air in the presenceof MeOH; tooursurprise
only the acid, rather than the expected ester, was detected
(entry 11). In contrast, the use of trans-azobenzene as the
oxidant afforded cinnamic acid in the presence of water
(entry 12) and methyl cinnamate in the presence of MeOH
used. d Thiamine HCl (5, CAS No. 67-03-8) and 3 equiv of K2CO3 were
3
employed. e 84% yield of hydrocinnamic acid. f 30% yield of hydro-
cinnamic acid. g 4% yield of methyl cinnamate. h 44% yield of methyl
cinnamate.
the oxidation of either cinnamaldehyde or para-fluoro-
benzaldehyde (entry 4 and Supporting Information).9,10
After extensive optimization, we found that reproducible
formation of cinnamic acid could be achieved under
slightly modified Zhang conditions: with 5 mol % IMesCl
(3) and 2 equiv of K2CO3 in DMF (entries 5À8). Rigor-
ously dried reaction conditions gave lower yields or irre-
producible production of cinnamic acid, which was over-
come by the addition of a small amount of water (1
equiv).8,11 To be consistent with Zhang’s experiments, we
also attempted the reactions for 3 days, which gave slightly
higher conversions under all conditions (entry 6). Higher
concentration did not provide improved results due to
competing dimerization and other side reactions (entry 7).
A more extensive list of reaction conditions attempted can
be found in the Supporting Information. Unpurified
NMR spectra from the reaction mixtures under various
atmospheres show clean formation of the acid under air,
trace conversion under CO2, and the formation of bypro-
ducts under N2 or vacuum.12
(13) (a) Sohn, S. S.; Bode, J. W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3873–3876.
(b) Sohn, S. S.; Bode, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6021–6024.
(c) Reynolds, N. T.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 9518–9519.
(14) (a) Cannizzaro, S. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1853, 88, 129–130.
(b) Sreenivasulu, M.; Kumar, K. A.; Reddy, K. S.; Kumar, K. S.;
Kumar, P. R.; Chandrasekhar, K. B.; Pal, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011,
52, 727–732.
(15) (a) Inoue, H.; Higashiura, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1980, 549–550. (b) Noonan, C.; Baragwanath, L.; Connon, S. J. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4003–4006. (c) Rose, C. A.; Zeitler, K. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 4552–4555.
(16) (a) Guin, J.; De Sarkar, S.; Grimme, S.; Studer, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8727–8730. (b) De Sarkar, S.; Grimme, S.;
Studer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1190–1191.
(17) Maki, B. E.; Chan, A.; Phillips, E. M.; Scheidt, K. A. Tetra-
hedron 2009, 65, 3102–3109.
Our studies confirmed that IMesCl (3) was essential for
formation of the carboxylic acid product; only trace
amounts of cinnamic acid were observed in its absence
(entry 8). Triazolium precatalysts favored the formation of
(11) (a) Lim, M.; Yoon, C. M.; An, G.; Rhee, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 3835–3839. (b) An, G.; Ahn, H.; De Castro, K. A.; Rhee, H.
Synthesis 2010, 477–485.
(12) Atmosphere exchange for the reactions shown in Figure 1 was
performed by freezeÀpumpÀthaw, and reactions were conducted in a
sealed tube.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2011
2423