GModel
CATTOD-8847; No. of Pages6
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
M.G. Musolino et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Table 1
(
(
TPR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy
TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and
Main characteristics of B(OH)3 supported palladium catalyst.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is also included.
Catalyst
Pd loading (wt%)
BET surface
area (m /g)
Mean particle
size (nm)a
2
2
. Experimental
Nominal
5
XRF
3.8
Pd/B(OH)3
2.2
7.5
2.1. Catalyst preparation
a
Mean particles size from TEM.
5
% Pd/B(OH)3 was prepared by incipient wetness impregna-
tion of the commercial support B(OH) (Aldrich, purity 99.99%,
SBET = 1.9 m /g) with an acetone solution of palladium (II) acetyl-
3
2.3. Catalytic tests
2
acetonate, Pd(acac) , (Aldrich, purity 99%). After impregnation, the
sample was dried under vacuum at 353 K for 1 day and then reduced
for two hours, at the same temperature, under flowing hydrogen.
2
Liquid phase hydrogenation of both aliphatic and aromatic car-
bonyls and hydrogenolysis of aromatic alcohols were carried out
at 0.1 MPa partial hydrogen pressure in a 100 ml five-necked batch
reactor fitted with a reflux condenser. The reaction temperature
was maintained at a constant value (323 K) by circulation of sil-
icone oil in an external jacket connected with a thermostat. The
temperature of the reaction mixture was monitored by placing a
thermocouple inside the vessel. The catalyst (∼300 mg), previously
activated under H2 at 353 K for 2 h, was added to 25 ml of ethanol
(Fluka, 99.8% analytical grade) or cyclohexane (Sigma–Aldrich, 99%
analytical grade), and reduced in “situ” at 323 K for 1 h under H2
flow. Then, a solution of the organic compound (carbonyl or aro-
matic alcohol) in ethanol or cyclohexane (0.6 M, 15 ml), containing
tetradecane as internal standard, was added through one arm of the
flask. The reaction mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirrer head
coupled with a gas stirrer at a rate of 500 rpm. A TPR measurement,
carried out after reduction of the catalyst at 353 K, demonstrated
that palladium was completely reduced.
Preliminary runs, performed with different amounts of catalyst
and stirring rate, indicate that, under the experimental conditions
adopted, the reaction was carried out in absence of external and
internal mass-transfer limitations.
The progress of the reaction was followed by analyzing a suffi-
cient number of samples, withdrawn periodically from the reaction
mixture. Products analysis was performed with a gas chromato-
graph (HP model 5890), equipped with a wide-bore capillary
column (CP-WAX 52 CB, 50 m, i.d. = 0.53 mm) and a flame ionization
detector. Quantitative analysis was carried out by calculating the
areas of the chromatographic peaks with an electronic integrator
2.2. Catalyst characterization
BET surface area was determined by N2 adsorption desorp-
tion isotherms at the liquid nitrogen temperature by using a
Micromeritics Chemisorb 2750 instrument. The composition of the
flow gas was N :He = 30:70. Samples were outgassed under flowing
2
nitrogen for 1 h at 473 K, before measurements.
Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) was employed to
evaluate the reduction profile of the catalyst. 50 mg of the dried
sample were placed in a quartz tube reactor and heated from 298
to 700 K with a constant heating rate of 10 K/min and exposed to
3
a flow of 5 vol.% H /Ar mixture (20 cm /min). H consumption was
2
2
monitored by using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). A molec-
ular sieve cold trap (maintained at 193 K) and a tube filled with KOH,
placed before the TCD, were used to block water and CO , respec-
2
tively. The calibration of signals was made by injecting in the carrier
a known amount of H2.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired, at room
temperature, on a Philips X-Pert diffractometer, by using the Ni -
filtered Cu-K␣ radiation (ꢀ = 0.15418 nm). Data were collected in
◦
◦
◦
the 2ꢁ range 10 –80 with a scanning rate of 0.5 /min. Diffraction
peaks were compared with those of standard compounds reported
in the JPCDS Data File.
Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) pictures
of the reduced sample were collected on a High Resolution FESEM
instrument (LEO 1525) equipped with a Gemini Field Emission
Column. The catalyst particles size and the relative morphology
were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), using
a JEOL 2000 FX instrument operating at 200 kV and directly inter-
faced with a computer for real-time image processing. Particles size
distribution was obtained by counting several hundred particles
visible on the micrographs of the sample. The average value of the
(
HP model 3396).
2
.4. Analytical determination of boric acid in ethanol solution
In order to verify the complete dissolution of boric acid in
ethanol, 300 mg of catalyst were poured in 40 ml of C H5OH and
2
maintained at 323 K for 30 min. Then, after filtration of the solid,
2
.5 g of sorbitol, dissolved in water, were added and the proton
concentration ensuing from the reaction:
-
B
CHOH
CHOH
HC
HC
O
O
O
O
CH
CH
+
B(OH)3
+
2
+
H
+
3 H O
2
was determined by means of a conductometric titration, using a
standard solution 0.1 M of NaOH [15].
metal particles size was calculated by the following equation:
ꢀ
nidi
d¯ =
ꢀ
ni
3. Results and discussion
where n is the number of particles of diameter d .
i
i
3.1. Catalyst characterization
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed
using a Physical Electronics GMBH PHI 5800-01 spectrometer,
equipped with a monochromatic Al K␣ X-ray source. Binding ener-
gies (BE) values were referred to the carbon C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.
and XPS.
Please cite this article in press as: M.G. Musolino, et al., Unravelling the effect of Lewis acid properties of the support on the performance of