Chemistry Letters Vol.35, No.1 (2006)
29
ported VOx species whereas the presence of SbOx positively af-
fects the catalyst stability through the facilitation of the redox
cycle.12,13 Moreover, it is noted that the Mg-containing catalysts
studied exhibit much stable catalytic behavior compared to the
VSb/Al (Figure 1). When we checked the content of carbon
formation on each catalyst after 12 h on stream, we observed that
Mg-modified catalysts reveal less carbon formation (4.4–
6.0 wt %) as compared with VSb/Al (13.1 wt %), indicating
that modification of alumina support with magnesia leads to
the stable activity, at least partly, due to strong resistance against
carbon formation.
As illustrated in NH3-TPD profiles (Figure 2), the VSb/
MgnAl catalysts contain smaller amounts of surface acid
sites compared with the un-modified VSb/Al catalyst. Thus,
the higher Mg-content leads to the lower acidity. Therefore,
the better stability of the MgO-containing catalysts is ascribed
to their reduced surface acidities.
VSb/Mg0.5Al
Mg0.5Al
VSb/Mg0.3Al
Mg0.3Al
VSb/Mg0.1Al
Mg0.1Al
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2θ / degree
Figure 3. XRD patterns of MgnAl supports and VSb/MgnAl
catalysts: ( ) MgAl6O10; ( ) MgAl2O4; ( ) MgO; ( )
25
V
1:1Sb0:9O4; ( ) V0:95Sb0:95O4.
(a)
In summary, this work demonstrates that a favorable balance
20
between the decreased acidity of the V–Sb oxide catalyst sup-
ported on MgO-modified alumina and an amount of V–Sb oxide
species is needed for the stable and active catalytic performance
in the CO2-EBDH. As a result, modification of alumina support
with an appropriate amount of magnesia (Mg/Al ¼ 0:1) leads to
the stable activity of the VSb/Mg0:1Al catalyst for the reaction.
(b)
15
(c)
10
(d)
5
The financial support of the Ministry of Science and
Technology of Korea (MOST) is gratefully acknowledged.
VPV thanks the MOST for the visiting scientist fellowship.
We also thank Dr. S. H. Jhung for helpful discussions.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
o
Temperature / C
References
1
Figure 2. NH3-TPD profiles of (a) VSb/Al and VSb/MgnAl
catalysts: (b) n ¼ 0:1, (c) n ¼ 0:3, and (d) n ¼ 0:5.
J.-S. Chang, V. P. Vislovskiy, M.-S. Park, D.-Y. Hong, J. S.
Yoo, S.-E. Park, Green Chem. 2003, 5, 587.
2
3
N. Mimura, M. Saito, Catal. Today 2000, 55, 173.
Y. Sakurai, T. Suzaki, K. Nakagawa, N. Ikenaga, H. Aota, T.
Suzuki, J. Catal. 2002, 209, 16.
M. Sugino, H. Shimada, T. Turuda, H. Miura, N. Ikenaga, T.
Suzuki, Appl. Catal., A 1995, 121, 125.
According to XRD patterns (Figure 3), both Mg0:1Al sup-
port and VSb/Mg0:1Al catalyst do not contain a free crystalline
MgO phase. Instead they showed a fully incorporated into
spinel-like binary oxide phase, MgAl6O10. However, a crystal-
line MgO is distinctively observed in the Mg0:3Al and Mg0:5Al
whose major phase is MgAl2O4. Trace of free MgO particles
is also detectable when the V–Sb oxide is loaded on these sup-
port materials. However, taking into account no detectable phase
of vanadium oxide in XRD, a catalytically active V-component
appears to be well dispersed on the support materials. It was
found that XRD peaks of VSbO4–like phases, which are well de-
tectable in the VSb/Al12,13 and VSb/Mg0:1Al catalysts, are very
weak in the VSb/Mg0:3Al and, moreover, they fully disappear in
the VSb/Mg0:5Al catalyst. This result implies the stronger inter-
action between acidic V–Sb oxide and MgnAl support materials
while using a large content of basic MgO in catalyst preparation.
The increased acid–base interaction might lead to the formation
of magnesium vanadate(s) with the lower specific surface area,
which is probably two-dimensional and un-detectable phase in
XRD. It is reasonably assumed that a decrease in an amount of
active V-species exposed at the catalyst surface diminishes the
EB-conversions compared with those over VSb/Al and VSb/
Mg0:1Al samples.
4
5
6
7
´
T. Badstube, H. Papp, R. Dziembaj, P. Kustrowski, Appl.
Catal., A 2000, 204, 153.
N. Mimura, I. Takahara, M. Saito, Y. Sasaki, K. Murata, Catal.
Lett. 2002, 78, 125.
G. Carja, R. Nakamura, T. Aida, H. Niiyama, J. Catal. 2003,
218, 104.
S. Wang, Z. H. Zhu, Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 1126.
Y. Ohishi, T. Kawabata, T. Shishido, K. Takaki, Q. Zhang, Y.
Wang, K. Takehira, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 230, 49.
8
9
10 J.-S. Chang, S.-E. Park, M. S. Park, Chem. Lett. 1997, 1123.
11 S. Sato, M. Ohhara, T. Sodesawa, F. Nozaki, Appl. Catal.
1988, 37, 207.
12 V. P. Vislovskiy, J.-S. Chang, M.-S. Park, S.-E. Park, Catal.
Commun. 2002, 3, 227.
13 M.-S. Park, V. P. Vislovskiy, J.-S. Chang, Y.-G. Shul, J. S.
Yoo, S.-E. Park, Catal. Today 2003, 87, 205.
14 M. Machli, E. Heracleous, A. A. Lemonidou, Appl. Catal., A
2002, 236, 23.
15 O. R. Evans, A. T. Bell, T. D. Tilley, J. Catal. 2004, 226, 292.