Competing Reactions of Secondary
Alcohols with Sodium Hypochlorite
Promoted by Phase-Transfer Catalysis
SCHEME 1
Zack R. Bright, Cedric R. Luyeye,
Angela Ste. Marie Morton, Marina Sedenko,
Robert G. Landolt,* Matthew J. Bronzi,
Katherine M. Bohovic, M. W. Alex Gonser,
Theodore E. Lapainis, and William H. Hendrickson
Department of Chemistry, Texas Wesleyan University,
Fort Worth, Texas 76105, and Department of Chemistry,
University of Dallas, Irving, Texas 75060
Received June 3, 2004
pochlorite, with research indicating free radical pathways
2
to be operable and dichlorine monoxide (Cl O) suggested
5
as a reactive intermediate. With PTC under biphasic
conditions, bromo- and iodoaromatics undergo substitu-
tion reactions with aqueous hypochlorite, yielding chlo-
rinated aromatics.6
Tertiary alcohols, when treated with aqueous hy-
pochlorite under phase transfer catalytic conditions, are
subject to radical chain decomposition of intermediate
7
alkyl hypochlorites. Products are formed by â-scission
of an intermediate alkoxy radical, leading to a ketone and
chloroalkane, as shown in Scheme 1. Similar to most
phase transfer reactions with hypochlorite, tertiary
alcohol reactions are facilitated by the aqueous phase
being maintained at pH 8-9. Radical pathways are
inhibited by oxygen.
Significantly, hitherto unrecognized â-scission and
other free radical reactions may compete under condi-
tions routinely utilized for two-phase oxidations of sec-
ondary alcohols with aqueous hypochlorite. The degree
to which these processes successfully compete will reduce
the efficiency of alcohol to ketone syntheses, and the
competing processes themselves provide insight into the
role of solvents, pH, PTC, and structural features. The
present paper identifies a series of substrates subject to
this competition and identifies control parameters that
may be employed to impact yields from competing
pathways.8
With aqueous hypochlorite and a phase transfer catalyst,
secondary alcohols undergo hitherto unreported free radical
reactions that compete with and effectively limit traditional
ketone syntheses. Product mixture profiles are determined
by reactant ratios, organic cosolvent, and availability of
oxygen to the system. Under argon, over half of substrate
alcohols, PhCH(OH)R, are converted to benzaldehyde and
free radical products through â-scission of intermediate alkyl
hypochlorites. Secondary alcohols with R containing three
or more carbons also may undergo δ chlorination.
Aqueous sodium hypochlorite has been cited widely as
an effective oxidant in the transformation of secondary
alcohols to ketones as well as for a range of other
1
reactions. Under basic conditions, the utilization of a
phase transfer catalyst (PTC) such as tetra-n-butylam-
monium hydrogen sulfate (TBAHS) facilitates secondary
alcohol to ketone transformation in two phase systems,
with ethyl acetate exhibiting better results than dichlo-
At ambient temperatures, using dichloromethane,
TBAHS, and aqueous hypochlorite at pH ∼9, secondary
alcohols PhCH(OH)R (1) produced substantial benzalde-
hyde (2) as well as the expected ketones (3, Table 1).
Benzaldehyde yields reflect lower limits of substrates
undergoing â-scission, since under the same conditions
the aldehyde is subject to conversion to benzoic acid.
2
romethane as the organic phase. Kinetic studies, con-
3
ducted in air, of substituted 1-phenylethanols as well
4
as benzyl alcohols have shown that such oxidations are
facilitated by electron withdrawing substituents and
point toward an ionic reaction mechanism.
Phase transfer catalysts also are known to enable two-
phase chlorinations of hydrocarbons by aqueous hy-
(
5) (a) Fonouni, H. E.; Krishnan, S.; Kuhn, D. G.; Hamilton, G. A.
*
Address correspondence to this author at Texas Wesleyan Uni-
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7672-7676. (b) Dneprovskii, A. S.;
Eliseenkov, E. V. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 30 (2), 235-240.
(6) (a) O’Connor, K. J.; Burrows, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1344-
1346. (b) Arnold, J. T.; Bayraktaroglu, T. O.; Brown, R. G.; Heiermann,
C. R.; Magnus, W. W.; Ohman, A. B.; Landolt, R. G. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 391-393. (c) Bayraktaroglu, T. O.; Gooding, M. A.; Khatib,
S. F.; Lee, H.; Kourouma, M.; Landolt, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
1264-1265.
versity.
(
1) Skarzewski, J.; Siedlecka, R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1992, 24,
6
23-647.
(
2) (a) Lee, G. A.; Freedman, H. H. Isr. J. Chem. 1985, 26, 229-
2
7
34. (b) Mirafzal, G. A.; Lozeva, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
263-7266.
(
3) Sakai, A.; Hendrickson, D.G.; Hendrickson, W. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 2759-2763.
4) Bradley, L. M.; Lesica, J. M.; Albertson, K. B. React. Kinet. Catal.
Lett. 1997, 62, 3-7.
(7) Dailey, J. I.; Hays, R. S.; Lee, H.; Mitchell, R. M.; Ries, J. J.;
Landolt, R. G.; Hussmann; H. H.; Lockridge, J. B.; Hendrickson, W.
H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2568-2571.
(
10.1021/jo0490651 CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
684
J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 684-687
Published on Web 12/18/2004