1
460
H. Li et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 47 (2012) 1459–1466
catalytic materials, their performances in photocatalytic degrada-
tion of gaseous toluene and the detailed reaction mechanism were
then comparatively studied by in situ FTIR spectroscopy. Positive
illuminated by an XQ-500W xenon lamp. The distance between the
lamp and sample was about 15 cm. The light intensity at the sample
holder was about 40.5 mW cm . Two pellets were prepared in
À2
effect of Ag species on the photocatalytic properties of Ag/
a
-Fe
2
O
3
parallel.
composite material was expected.
Thereactioncellwaspurgedbydryairfor1 h.After1 h,thefluxof
dry air was set at 20 mL/min. Spectra of the clean catalyst surface
were collected after this process and utilized as the background.
2
. Experimental
Subsequently, toluene species was fed at the flow rate of 2
mL/h for
2
.1. Preparation of catalysts
ca. 30 min using a syringe pump to a mixing tee where it was
vaporized and mixed with the dry air. The reactant mixture then
flowed through the reaction cell and allowed to equilibrate at room
temperature (293 K). We determined whether the reactant concen-
trationwasstabilizedbycollectingitsinfraredspectrumevery5 min
until a stable peak line on the infrared spectrum was obtained. Once
the reactant concentration was stabilized, the inlet and outlet ports
were shut off and the lamps were turned on. The infrared spectra
were continuously collected during the reaction. The infrared
All the materials were analytical grade regents and used
without further purification.
Hollow ‘‘spindle-like’’ -Fe
mal route. FeCl O (18 mmol) was added into distilled water
Á6H
60 mL) to form a clear solution. Then 4.32 g urea (CH O) and
mL ethylene glycol, a protective agent were added into the
a
2 3
O was obtained via a hydrother-
3
2
(
9
4 2
N
solution. Subsequently under magnetic stirring for 30 min at room
temperature, the resultant solution was put into a Teflon-lined
stainless steel autoclave of 100 mL in capacity, which was sealed
and maintained at 180 8C for 12 h. After cooling to room
temperature naturally, the obtained precipitate was collected by
filtration, and then washed with absolute ethanol and distilled
water in sequence for several times. The final product was dried in
a vacuum box at 80 8C for 12 h.
À1
spectra were collected with a resolution of 1 cm and 20 scans in
À1
the region of 4000–1000 cm
.
The reactant concentration was measured by gas chromatog-
raphy (Aligent 7890A, USA). During the reaction process, samples
of approximately 1
mL at the outlet every 0.5 h, were collected and
the change in concentration of toluene was analyzed by a gas
chromatography equipped with FID (HP-5 capillary column
0
.3335 g of as-prepared hollow spindle-shaped
a
-Fe
2
O
3
was
(30 m  320
m
m  0.25 m)) and TCD (Porapak Q). When the peak
added into distilled water (20 mL) to form a solution under
ultrasonic stirring for 10 min at room temperature. 0.45 g CTAB
was added into the above solution, then after magnetic stirring for
intensity of toluene did not obviously change, the xenon lamp was
turned off and the cell was purified with the nitrogen.
3
0 min and ultrasonic stirring for 30 min, the solution was added
3. Results and discussion
into 25% NH O (3 mL) and 0.105 g AgNO under magnetic
3
ÁH
2
3
stirring for 20 min at room temperature. Then the precipitation
was collected by centrifugation, and washed with absolute ethanol
and distilled water in sequence for several times. After evapora-
tion, the catalyst was then dried at 100 8C for 12 h and calcined at
3.1. XRD analysis
The X-ray diffraction patterns of
samples are shown in Fig. 1. Seven major characteristic peaks can
be indexed as the rhombohedral structure (JCPDS 84-0311) [20],
2 3 2 3
a-Fe O and Ag/a-Fe O
5
50 8C in air for 2 h followed by slow cooling under air atmosphere.
which indicates the
2 3
a-Fe O phase with high purity and
2.2. Characterizations
crystallinity (Fig. 1). No peaks from other phases are found,
suggesting that the as-synthesized sample is pure highly. The
The phase structures of the
a-Fe O
2 3
based samples prepared
characteristic peaks at 2u of 24.188, 33.158, 35.758, 40.938, 49.438,
were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, RIGAKU, Dmax22000)
with Cu K radiation ( = 0.15418 nm) over the 2 range of 20–808.
The morphology of the samples was investigated by scanning
electronic microscopy (SEM) with a JSM-6700 LV electron micro-
54.028, 57.568, 62.518, 64.058, 71.948 and 75.488 are corresponding
to (0 1 2), (1 0 4), (1 1 0), (1 1 3), (0 2 4), (1 1 6), (0 1 8), (2 1 4),
(3 0 0), (0 1 1 0) and (2 2 0) crystallographic nucleation planes of
hematite phase, respectively. In addition, the peak of (1 0 4) planes
a
l
u
scope operating at 5.0 kV and transmission electron microscope
2 3
at 2u = 33.158 indicated a fine preferential growth of the a-Fe O
sample in the (1 0 4) direction. Two peaks of (1 1 1) and (2 0 0)
planes corresponding to Ag species (JCPD No. 00-004-0783) could
2
(TEM, FEITecnaiG 20).Thecompositionswereexaminedbyenergy-
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in the SEM. The amount of Ag
dopant was determined by inductive coupling IPS-AEC (Optima
2
000 DV, Perkin Elmer, USA). Light absorption property was
examined using a UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer
JASCO, UV-550). The separation and transfer behaviors of the
(
photogenerated charge carriers in the samples were investigated
using a lock-in-based surface photovoltage (SPV) measurement
system, which consists of a monochromator (model Omni-
and a lock-in amplifier (model SR830-DSP) with an optical chopper
model SR540) running at a frequency of 20 Hz. All of the SPV
l 3005)
(
measurements were performed at room temperature. The XPS data
were recorded using an ESCALAB250 electron spectrometer using
+
achromatic Al K
a
radiation (1486.6 eV) with Ar sputtering to
remove the surface layer of the sample.
2.3. Photocatalytic performance of the
2 3 2 3
a-Fe O and Ag/a-Fe O
sample by GC and in situ FTIR
In situ FT-IR spectra were collected with a Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectrophotometer (BRUKER VERTEX 70 Optics) and a self-
made in situIRquartz photoreactioncell[19]. The photocatalyst was
Fig. 1. The X-ray diffraction patterns of
2 3 2 3
a-Fe O and Ag/a-Fe O samples.